On 14 January 2012 11:42, Da Rock
wrote:
> On 01/14/12 05:53, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>
>> 13.01.2012 18:51, Da Rock пишет:
>>
>>
>>> Once submitted do the committers offer any advice on improvements?
>>
>> Yep, it happens from sometime.
>>
> Ok. I've submitted; but I have a problem viewing it on
On 01/14/12 05:53, Boris Samorodov wrote:
13.01.2012 18:51, Da Rock пишет:
Once submitted do the committers offer any advice on improvements?
Yep, it happens from sometime.
Ok. I've submitted; but I have a problem viewing it on the pr web page.
According to my mail system it has gone through
On 01/13/12 07:51, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/13/12 04:19, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 January 2012 12:26, Da Rock
wrote:
On 01/12/12 17:54, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/01/2012 06:44, Da Rock wrote:
I have a Makefile, pkg-desc, pkg-plist, pkg-message, distinfo. I also
have the files hosted and the MA
On 01/13/12 04:19, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 January 2012 12:26, Da Rock
wrote:
On 01/12/12 17:54, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/01/2012 06:44, Da Rock wrote:
I have a Makefile, pkg-desc, pkg-plist, pkg-message, distinfo. I also
have the files hosted and the MASTER_FILES set to include the linux
On 12 January 2012 12:26, Da Rock
wrote:
> On 01/12/12 17:54, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>> On 12/01/2012 06:44, Da Rock wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a Makefile, pkg-desc, pkg-plist, pkg-message, distinfo. I also
>>> have the files hosted and the MASTER_FILES set to include the linux
>>> sites (just where
On 01/12/12 17:54, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/01/2012 06:44, Da Rock wrote:
I have a Makefile, pkg-desc, pkg-plist, pkg-message, distinfo. I also
have the files hosted and the MASTER_FILES set to include the linux
sites (just where the files are located). I am looking for a backup site
to all t
On 12/01/2012 06:44, Da Rock wrote:
> I have a Makefile, pkg-desc, pkg-plist, pkg-message, distinfo. I also
> have the files hosted and the MASTER_FILES set to include the linux
> sites (just where the files are located). I am looking for a backup site
> to all that IF I can twist someones arm?
>
On 01/12/12 02:23, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 11/01/2012 16:10, Eitan Adler wrote:
post-extract:
.if defined(WITH_PAM)
PLIST_FILES+=lib/security/pam_ldap.so
.else
@if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/lib/security/pam_ldap.so ]; then \
On 11/01/2012 16:10, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> post-extract:
>>> >> .if defined(WITH_PAM)
>>> >> PLIST_FILES+=lib/security/pam_ldap.so
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> .else
>>> >> @if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/lib/security/pam_ldap.so ]; then \
>>> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/11/12 11:10 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Paul Schmehl
> wrote:
>> --On January 11, 2012 10:44:11 AM +1000 Da Rock
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> My last problem is with the define knobs. I have an .if defined(WITH_PAM)
>>>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On January 11, 2012 10:44:11 AM +1000 Da Rock
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> My last problem is with the define knobs. I have an .if defined(WITH_PAM)
>> .else ... .endif statement, but it keeps giving me trouble. I can't quite
>> figure what I've got
--On January 11, 2012 10:44:11 AM +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
My last problem is with the define knobs. I have an .if defined(WITH_PAM)
.else ... .endif statement, but it keeps giving me trouble. I can't quite
figure what I've got wrong. The statement looks like this:
post-extract:
.
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:45:13 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
> On 01/11/12 07:11, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:55:48 +1000 Da Rock
> > wrote:
> >> CATEGORIES=net linux
> >> MASTER_SITES=
> >> ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/archive.fedoraproject.org/fedora/linux/updates/testin
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:30:53 -0600 Paul Schmehl
wrote:
> --On January 10, 2012 10:11:15 PM +0100 Alexander Leidinger
> wrote:
> > I can't remember if we have the fedora archives in bsd.sites.mk (if
> > not, it would be worth to add it), and I'm too lazy ATM to search
> > for it. If we have the
On 01/11/12 07:11, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:55:48 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
Now my Makefile looks like this:
# New ports collection makefile for:linux-f10-nss_ldap
# Date created: 2012-01-04
# Whom: da porta
port
On 01/11/12 07:11, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:55:48 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
Now my Makefile looks like this:
# New ports collection makefile for:linux-f10-nss_ldap
# Date created: 2012-01-04
# Whom: da porta
port
--On January 10, 2012 10:11:15 PM +0100 Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:55:48 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
Now my Makefile looks like this:
# New ports collection makefile for:linux-f10-nss_ldap
# Date created: 2012-01-04
# Whom:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:55:48 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
> Now my Makefile looks like this:
>
> # New ports collection makefile for:linux-f10-nss_ldap
> # Date created: 2012-01-04
> # Whom: da porta
> port_maintai...@herveybayaustralia.com.au
--On January 10, 2012 10:52:32 AM +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
I'm having some trouble using knobs and "defined" in the Makefile. It
keeps complaining about the unexpected.
I've tried .if defined(WITH_PAM) and .ifdefined(WITH_PAM) and it
complains about an unexpected "(" in the first, and an unexpect
I'm having some trouble using knobs and "defined" in the Makefile. It
keeps complaining about the unexpected.
I've tried .if defined(WITH_PAM) and .ifdefined(WITH_PAM) and it
complains about an unexpected "(" in the first, and an unexpected word
in the second.
How do I conditionally handle t
On 01/10/12 08:28, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On January 9, 2012 3:55:48 PM +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
I just need to work out how to check the checksum against a linux
source.
I haven't found that yet.
My brief search was unsuccessful as well. Is it really possible that
the LInux community has ab
On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> My brief search was unsuccessful as well. Is it really possible that the
> LInux community has abandoned providing checksums for RPM packages? If so,
> that boggles the mind. Surely they don't believe their repositories are
> unassailable?
rp
On 09/01/2012 22:28, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On January 9, 2012 3:55:48 PM +1000 Da Rock
> wrote:
>>
>> I just need to work out how to check the checksum against a linux source.
>> I haven't found that yet.
>>
>
> My brief search was unsuccessful as well. Is it really possible that
> the LInux c
--On January 9, 2012 3:55:48 PM +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
I just need to work out how to check the checksum against a linux source.
I haven't found that yet.
My brief search was unsuccessful as well. Is it really possible that the
LInux community has abandoned providing checksums for RPM packag
On 9 Jan 2012 06:01, "Da Rock"
wrote:
>
> All arguments aside, I've finally made headway - I think... its really
frustrating for me because to me it seems a bit of a "blackbox" atm. I'm
still trying to untangle the threads.
>
> I fiddled and tweaked and finally got make to run. I then ran make
-DP
All arguments aside, I've finally made headway - I think... its really
frustrating for me because to me it seems a bit of a "blackbox" atm. I'm
still trying to untangle the threads.
I fiddled and tweaked and finally got make to run. I then ran make
-DPACKAGE_BUILD makesum and got a checksum (S
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:31:04 + Chris Rees wrote:
> On 6 January 2012 21:16, Alexander Leidinger
> wrote:
> > The linux ports are a little bit special. They are binary ports and
> > the GPL requires that we distribute the source too.
>
> Really? That's not how I read the GPL, nor its interpr
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 08:31:04PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 6 January 2012 21:16, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > The linux ports are a little bit special. They are binary ports and the
> > GPL requires that we distribute the source too.
>
> Really? That's not how I read the GPL, nor its inte
On 6 January 2012 21:16, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> The linux ports are a little bit special. They are binary ports and the
> GPL requires that we distribute the source too.
Really? That's not how I read the GPL, nor its interpretation:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesWrittenO
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
> Ok, clean slate. Lets start afresh :)
>
> First I need a way to test properly. Alex, you mention I need a ports
> tree on the machine, and then you say to create a directory somewhere
> and put Makefile in it and run make (as root). Does the
On 07.01.2012 14:01 (UTC+1), Da Rock wrote:
On 01/07/12 19:11, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
And finally checksums: I create a checksum for the port, the linux sites
have checksums, and I was advised in passing to check the checksums
match. The checksu
On 01/07/12 19:11, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
And finally checksums: I create a checksum for the port, the linux sites
have checksums, and I was advised in passing to check the checksums
match. The checksums are going to differ aren't they? Linux an
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> And finally checksums: I create a checksum for the port, the linux sites
> have checksums, and I was advised in passing to check the checksums
> match. The checksums are going to differ aren't they? Linux and BSD
> checksums wouldn't be the s
Ok, clean slate. Lets start afresh :)
First I need a way to test properly. Alex, you mention I need a ports
tree on the machine, and then you say to create a directory somewhere
and put Makefile in it and run make (as root). Does the directory need
to be in the ports tree then?
The rpm files
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:52:40 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
> In the porters handbook it mentions checksums and "make makesum" -
> does that mean I have to put it in the ports tree to try it?
You need to have the ports tree on the machine where you try it. Just
create a directory somewhere, copy the Makef
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:33:30 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
> On 01/05/12 21:18, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > See the comment in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. There are lots of
> > very informative comments in that file.
> I've read that before too, but I seem to be missing something
> fundamental about ports
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 17:24:50 +0100 Gary Jennejohn
wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:33:30 +1000
> Da Rock wrote:
> > All I want is 3 files from the usr/lib in the rpm (I think). What I
> > couldn't quite ascertain is what is done here in the
> > bsd.linux-rpm.mk: is it extracted and the files cop
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:19:55 -0700 Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:20:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> > On 01/05/12 12:11, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > >
> > >The best way to learn, I think, is to get yourself a mentor and
> > >jump in. That's how I'm doing it (and yeah, that means I'm not
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:42:17 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
> On 01/05/12 07:10, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to
> >> FreeBSD. I've been operating it manually very successfully
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:18:25 +0100 Gary Jennejohn
wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:52:40 +1000
> Da Rock wrote:
> > And I have a question or two about the rpm. Do I need to script
> > something to just extract the files needed, or is it already in the
> > mk files already somewhere?
> >
>
> I s
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:33:30 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/05/12 21:18, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
[snip lots of old stuff]
> There are native ports, and there are the linux base ports. For the
> native ports the maintainer hosts? But these linux ports are they hosted
> on the linux rpm sites? Or are
On 6 Jan 2012 14:37, "Da Rock"
wrote:
> If I have to find a host for it I can host it, but what opportunities for
a backup site exist in case of failure? Do I have to arrange that as the
maintainer, or is it mirrored by FreeBSD automatically? Ideally I suppose
both those scenarios would be in orde
On 06/01/2012 14:33, Da Rock wrote:
> There are native ports, and there are the linux base ports. For the
> native ports the maintainer hosts? But these linux ports are they hosted
> on the linux rpm sites? Or are they hosted by the maintainer? So I
> believe I cannot sort a few things out until I
On 01/05/12 21:18, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:52:40 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
On 01/04/12 23:27, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to
FreeBSD. I've been operating it manually
--On January 5, 2012 12:22:45 PM +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
Ok. I've been working through the handbook step by step, and I'm stuck at
checksums so I probably haven't yet reached that part yet. I'll check it
out now
To get the checksums, type make fetch to download the packages and then
make
On 4 Jan 2012 23:58, "Da Rock"
wrote:
>
> On 01/05/12 01:41, Chad Perrin wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock
>>> wrote:
I was advised to copy the essential parts from a similar port, so I've
>>>
On 5 Jan 2012 04:13, "Janketh Jay" wrote:
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi guys!
>
> On 01/04/2012 08:19 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:20:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> >> On 01/05/12 12:11, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The best way to learn, I t
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:52:40 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/04/12 23:27, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000
> > Da Rock wrote:
> >
> >> I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to
> >> FreeBSD. I've been operating it manually very successfully now i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rock,
On 01/04/2012 09:24 PM, Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/05/12 14:15, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Janketh Jay wrote:
>>> As much as I hate to toss Chris Rees "under the bus" on this, he's
>>> be EXTREMELY helpful to me when
On 01/05/12 14:15, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Janketh Jay wrote:
As much as I hate to toss Chris Rees "under the bus" on this, he's
be EXTREMELY helpful to me when creating ports that have small hiccups
like this. He's very knowledgeable. While he might be a bit too
On 01/05/12 14:13, Janketh Jay wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys!
On 01/04/2012 08:19 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:20:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/05/12 12:11, Chad Perrin wrote:
The best way to learn, I think, is to get yourself a mentor a
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Janketh Jay wrote:
> As much as I hate to toss Chris Rees "under the bus" on this, he's
> be EXTREMELY helpful to me when creating ports that have small hiccups
> like this. He's very knowledgeable. While he might be a bit too busy to
> be a "mentor", I'm sure h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys!
On 01/04/2012 08:19 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:20:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>> On 01/05/12 12:11, Chad Perrin wrote:
>>>
>>> The best way to learn, I think, is to get yourself a mentor and jump in.
>>> That's how I'
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:20:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/05/12 12:11, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> >The best way to learn, I think, is to get yourself a mentor and jump in.
> >That's how I'm doing it (and yeah, that means I'm not the right person to
> >mentor you).
>
> Thats what I'm looking fo
On 01/05/12 12:08, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:53:25AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/05/12 01:41, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
I was advised to copy the essential parts f
On 01/05/12 12:11, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:42:17AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/05/12 07:10, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
This should be you (if you're willing to maintain the port).
You keep dropping hints like this all the time Alex :)
Honestly, though, I'm not sure whats
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:42:17AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/05/12 07:10, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >
> >This should be you (if you're willing to maintain the port).
>
> You keep dropping hints like this all the time Alex :)
>
> Honestly, though, I'm not sure whats involved or whether I'm c
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:53:25AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/05/12 01:41, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >>On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock
> >> wrote:
> >>>I was advised to copy the essential parts from a similar port, so I've
On 01/05/12 07:10, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to
FreeBSD. I've been operating it manually very successfully now in a
number of operations. This is, however, my first attempt at a
On 01/05/12 01:41, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
I was advised to copy the essential parts from a similar port, so I've
used archivers/linux-f10-ucl. This is my Makefile:
[snip]
Doesn't p
On 01/04/12 23:27, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to
FreeBSD. I've been operating it manually very successfully now in a
number of operations. This is, however, my first attempt at a port a
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
> I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to
> FreeBSD. I've been operating it manually very successfully now in a
> number of operations. This is, however, my first attempt at a port
> and I would like some guidance to s
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock
> wrote:
> >
> > I was advised to copy the essential parts from a similar port, so I've
> > used archivers/linux-f10-ucl. This is my Makefile:
[snip]
>
> Doesn't pass portlint.
>
> Ca
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to
> FreeBSD. I've been operating it manually very successfully now in a
> number of operations. This is, however, my first attempt at a port and I
> would like some guidance to
I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to
FreeBSD. I've been operating it manually very successfully now in a
number of operations. This is, however, my first attempt at a port and I
would like some guidance to see if I've done this right.
I was advised to copy the ess
65 matches
Mail list logo
