- Original Message -
> 2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi :
> > Well, now that libreoffice build is
> > solved, than what about insert
> > a line:
> > CONFLICTS_BUILD= boost*
> > near line 63 of Makefile???
>
> libreoffice does not conflict with boost;
> just Makefile has a problem.
>
On 9-6-2012 9:42, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 7 June 2012 15:28, Hiroto Kagotani wrote:
>> 2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi :
>>> Well, now that libreoffice build is
>>> solved, than what about insert
>>> a line:
>>> CONFLICTS_BUILD=boost*
>>> near line 63 of Makefile???
>>
>> libreoffice does not
On 7 June 2012 15:28, Hiroto Kagotani wrote:
> 2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi :
>> Well, now that libreoffice build is
>> solved, than what about insert
>> a line:
>> CONFLICTS_BUILD= boost*
>> near line 63 of Makefile???
>
> libreoffice does not conflict with boost;
> just Makefile has a pr
2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi :
> Well, now that libreoffice build is
> solved, than what about insert
> a line:
> CONFLICTS_BUILD= boost*
> near line 63 of Makefile???
libreoffice does not conflict with boost;
just Makefile has a problem.
Attached is the patch.
--
Hiroto Kagotani
Make
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:38:36 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
>
>Olivier Smedts writes:
>
>> This way it loses dependency tracking (ie.
>> /var/db/pkg/boost-libs-*/+REQUIRED_BY).
>> Don't forget to "portmaster --check-depends" after the pkg_add.
>
> Am I the only one who thinks the make proc
Olivier Smedts writes:
> This way it loses dependency tracking (ie.
> /var/db/pkg/boost-libs-*/+REQUIRED_BY).
> Don't forget to "portmaster --check-depends" after the pkg_add.
Am I the only one who thinks the make process should not depend
on tools like portmaster?
Hi,
2012/6/7 Kevin Oberman :
> # portmaster -g boost-libs boost-jam
> # pkg_delete -f boost-libs-\* boost-jam-\*
> # cd /usr/ports/editor/libreoffice
> # make patch
> # cd work/libreoffice-core
> --- lotuswordpro/Module_lotuswordpro.mk.orig 2012-05-31
> 19:34:52.014043605 -0300
> +++ lotuswordp
For me, the
lotusworldpro fix is not needed, as
libreoffice build without any fix other than
the original patches...
I use only the PKGNG so when
I remove boost*, it removes the package but not the dependencies (in
the /var/db/pkg/local.sqlite)
so when I reinstall boost*, everything is OK
Sergi
>
> Yes, boost is used by many things, but a CONFLICTS line is appropriate
> as libreoffice will not build correctly if it is installed.
>
> In addition, we need instructions to temporarily remove boost-libs and
> boost-jam while libreoffice is building. It may then be re-installed,
> as boost is o
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Heino Tiedemann
wrote:
> Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
>
>> Well, now that libreoffice build is
>> solved, than what about insert
>> a line:
>> CONFLICTS_BUILD= boost*
>> near line 63 of Makefile???
>>
>> this will prevent libreoffice build with boost in the s
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Well, now that libreoffice build is
> solved, than what about insert
> a line:
> CONFLICTS_BUILD=boost*
> near line 63 of Makefile???
>
> this will prevent libreoffice build with boost in the system.
Does that mean, that libreoffice won't compile if boost* i
Well, now that libreoffice build is
solved, than what about insert
a line:
CONFLICTS_BUILD=boost*
near line 63 of Makefile???
this will prevent libreoffice build with boost in the system.
Sergio
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
12 matches
Mail list logo
