On 9-6-2012 9:42, Chris Rees wrote: > On 7 June 2012 15:28, Hiroto Kagotani <hiroto.kagot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi <lenzi.ser...@gmail.com>: >>> Well, now that libreoffice build is >>> solved, than what about insert >>> a line: >>> CONFLICTS_BUILD= boost* >>> near line 63 of Makefile??? >> >> libreoffice does not conflict with boost; >> just Makefile has a problem. >> >> Attached is the patch. > > The only functional difference here is removing the BDB includes from > CPPFLAGS; > > from bsd.port.mk > > .if defined(HAS_CONFIGURE) > @(cd ${CONFIGURE_WRKSRC} && \ > ${SET_LATE_CONFIGURE_ARGS} \ > if ! ${SETENV} CC="${CC}" CPP="${CPP}" CXX="${CXX}" \ > CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" CPPFLAGS="${CPPFLAGS}" CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS}" \ > > So CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS are already added to CONFIGURE_ARGS. > > I would suspect something more subtle is at work here.
If this fixes things, then some /real/ configure options are the culprit. This fix doesn't work like the author thinks it does, since CONFIGURE_ARGS is /not/ CONFIGURE_ENV. So this would effectively result in environment variables being passed as arguments to the configure script. You'd have to look at the configure script implementation to see what the consequences are of that. -- Mel _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"