On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:08:19 + Mark Linimon
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:06:28PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > What's wrong with having it build on the pointyhat cluster for those
> > which build a package and to make it an option for those which build
> > the port?
>
> Surely
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:06:28PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> What's wrong with having it build on the pointyhat cluster for those
> which build a package and to make it an option for those which build
> the port?
Surely we want the pointyhat package to be the same as the default
package
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:22:26 -0800 Doug Barton
wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 08:06, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > What's wrong with having it build on the pointyhat cluster for those
> > which build a package and to make it an option for those which build
> > the port?
>
> I think some ports have spl
On Mon 13 Dec 2010 at 11:22:26 PST Doug Barton wrote:
I think some ports have split the docs into their own port, e.g.,
gimp. Is that a reasonable approach here? The fact that a lot of the
gnome stuff A) makes docs by default, B) with no option to turn it
off, which C) pulls in a ton of docbo
On 12/13/2010 08:06, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:12:39 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:31:25 +0100
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:23:51 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
wrote:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
Paweł Pękala wrote:
doc
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:12:39 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:31:25 +0100
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:23:51 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
> > > Paweł Pękala wrote:
> >
> > > > docbook2pdf is p
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:31:25 +0100
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:23:51 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
> > Paweł Pękala wrote:
>
> > > docbook2pdf is part of textproc/docbook-utils so now we have all
> > > dependencies correctly se
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:23:51 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
> Paweł Pękala wrote:
> > docbook2pdf is part of textproc/docbook-utils so now we have all
> > dependencies correctly set.
>
> Yes, but we don't want them ;)
*Some* people do not want them, so it sh
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
Paweł Pękala wrote:
> Dnia 2010-12-11, o godz. 21:26:24
> Alexander Leidinger napisał(a):
>
> >
> >Pawel/Martin, yes, I would like to use the --disable-manual part
> >(building the manual by default) to offer the possibility to not have
> >that much dependenci
Dnia 2010-12-11, o godz. 21:26:24
Alexander Leidinger napisał(a):
>
>Pawel/Martin, yes, I would like to use the --disable-manual part
>(building the manual by default) to offer the possibility to not have
>that much dependencies (build depends).
>
>Pawel, Claws-Mail 3.7.7 was not building the pdf
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:52:13 +0800 wen heping
wrote:
> 2010/12/11 Jerry :
> > There is a PR - Number: 152870 waiting to be committed. It fixes
>
> I will take it next week if no other committer take it.
miwi took it already (on the 8th). What surprises me is that the
auto-assigner didn't assig
2010/12/11 Jerry :
> There is a PR - Number: 152870 waiting to be committed. It fixes
I will take it next week if no other committer take it.
wen
> a nasty bug in how claws-mail reacts with external scripts. Is it
> possible for this port to be committed?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Jerry ✌
> freebsd-
There is a PR - Number: 152870 waiting to be committed. It fixes
a nasty bug in how claws-mail reacts with external scripts. Is it
possible for this port to be committed?
Thanks!
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Pleas
13 matches
Mail list logo
