On 12/13/2010 08:06, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:12:39 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu<ite...@freebsd.org>
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:31:25 +0100
Alexander Leidinger<alexan...@leidinger.net> wrote:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:23:51 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
<ite...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
Paweł Pękala<c...@o2.pl> wrote:
docbook2pdf is part of textproc/docbook-utils so now we have all
dependencies correctly set.
Yes, but we don't want them ;)
*Some* people do not want them, so it should be configurable (with
the default for at least the official package build cluster to be
enabled).
Can't we just fetch the file as DSITFILES from somewhere?
Do you want to invest time to build the port + manual, make the manual
available somewhere, and modify the port each time to fetch it?
What's wrong with having it build on the pointyhat cluster for those
which build a package and to make it an option for those which build
the port?
I think some ports have split the docs into their own port, e.g., gimp.
Is that a reasonable approach here? The fact that a lot of the gnome
stuff A) makes docs by default, B) with no option to turn it off, which
C) pulls in a ton of docbook and other deps; is not something I'm fond
of, and would prefer to not see repeated elsewhere. :)
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
