On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:09:52AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> [...]
> > > Are you maintainers really going to let your ports be the ones that
> > > hold us up?! You
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
> > Are you maintainers really going to let your ports be the ones that
> > hold us up?! You know who you are since you've already received email
> > about this, so
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers
> we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete
> X11BASE compliance.
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-exp-latest/index-mai
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:28:40PM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> >
> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-exp-latest/index-maintainer.html
> >
> > We're now down to fewer than 110 ports that need to be corrected to
> > deal with a non-standard X11BASE location (the rest are more genera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Thoumie wrote:
> Rong-En Fan wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers
>>> we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete
Rong-En Fan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers
>> we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete
>> X11BASE compliance.
>
> You are welcome. Most ports listed are easy to
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers
> we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete
> X11BASE compliance.
You are welcome. Most ports listed are easy to fix
1) properly define USE
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 06:23:44AM +0300, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The patch for vietnamese/xvnkb port was commited today by rafan
> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106020). Please check again if
> everything is okay with the port now.
> I'd like to have a look at 1 or tw
Hello,
The patch for vietnamese/xvnkb port was commited today by rafan
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106020). Please check again if
everything is okay with the port now.
I'd like to have a look at 1 or two ports in the list, hope that I can do
something with them.
Thank you to K
Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers
we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete
X11BASE compliance.
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-exp-latest/index-maintainer.html
We're now down to fewer than 110 ports that need to be correct
10 matches
Mail list logo
