Re: openoffice package requires libstdc++.so.6

2008-01-12 Thread Jason C. Wells
Garrett Cooper wrote: Did you install OpenOffice from a package? libstdc++.so.6 comes with gcc-3.4+ by default, so why isn't your system finding it...? I should mention that this is the first time I have installed openoffice. I cannot say that openoffice used to work. This is a fresh binar

Re: openoffice package requires libstdc++.so.6

2008-01-12 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: * Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports]: Jason C. Wells wrote: The prebuilt package openoffice-2.3.1 requires libstdc++.so.6. FreeBSD 6.3 has libstdc++.so.5. I have always rolled my own and am unfamiliar with packages. This particular

Re: openoffice package requires libstdc++.so.6

2008-01-12 Thread Thomas-Martin Seck
* Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports]: >> Jason C. Wells wrote: >>> The prebuilt package openoffice-2.3.1 requires libstdc++.so.6. >>> FreeBSD 6.3 has libstdc++.so.5. >>> I have always rolled my own and am unfamiliar with packages. This >>> particular package wo

Re: openoffice package requires libstdc++.so.6

2008-01-12 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Jan 12, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Install the package/port gcc42. I have said this to the list before. Surely any port that uses gcc4.2 or such like HAS to have it listed as RUN_DEPENDS or LIB_DEPENDS as well as BUILD_DEPENDS. And this needs to be fixed at th

Re: openoffice package requires libstdc++.so.6

2008-01-12 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Install the package/port gcc42. I have said this to the list before. Surely any port that uses gcc4.2 or such like HAS to have it listed as RUN_DEPENDS or LIB_DEPENDS as well as BUILD_DEPENDS. And this needs to be fixed at the ports/Mk level. How can the naive user be expected to know to ins