Hi,
this is also related to LUA and has a proposed patch
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232953
Can some committer soul have a look? Thank you.
El 2017-11-09 21:09, Herbert J. Skuhra escribió:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 20:16:50 +0100,
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
> > > Can you/anyone
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 20:16:50 +0100,
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > > > Can you/anyone commit it?
> > >
> > > A simple build-test looks OK (but fails if LUA is enabled),
> > > but I can't run-test it. Can you do it ?
> > >
> > > With LUA I've seen some strange thing on a simple build-test
> >
Hi!
> > > Can you/anyone commit it?
> >
> > A simple build-test looks OK (but fails if LUA is enabled),
> > but I can't run-test it. Can you do it ?
> >
> > With LUA I've seen some strange thing on a simple build-test
> > on a loaded box, must re-do it in poudriere.
>
> Hmm, autoreconf obviously
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:42:17 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > Bugzilla[1] lists three new and one open PR for mail/opendkim. Is the
> > port still maintained?
>
> Yes, but some of the PRs are difficult to parse.
>
> > The port does not build with security/openssl-devel. There is a patch:
Hi!
> Bugzilla[1] lists three new and one open PR for mail/opendkim. Is the
> port still maintained?
Yes, but some of the PRs are difficult to parse.
> The port does not build with security/openssl-devel. There is a patch:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828466
> https://s
