On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:42:17 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > Bugzilla[1] lists three new and one open PR for mail/opendkim. Is the
> > port still maintained?
> 
> Yes, but some of the PRs are difficult to parse.
> 
> > The port does not build with security/openssl-devel. There is a patch:
> > 
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828466
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/opendkim/patches/37/
> > https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/plain/trunk/openssl_1.1.0_compat.patch?h=packages/opendkim
> > 
> > The patch requires autoreconf.
> 
> I generated a patch using that patch in
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223568

Thanks.

I've just found out that the patch breaks the build with libressl. :-(
Maybe the following lines are required:

.if ${SSL_DEFAULT:Mopenssl-devel}
USES+=  autoreconf
EXTRA_PATCHES=  ${FILESDIR}\extra-patch-configure.ac \
                ${FILESDIR}\extra-patch-opendkim_opendkim-crypto.c
.endif

> > Can you/anyone commit it?
> 
> A simple build-test looks OK (but fails if LUA is enabled),
> but I can't run-test it. Can you do it ?
>
> With LUA I've seen some strange thing on a simple build-test
> on a loaded box, must re-do it in poudriere.

Hmm, autoreconf obviously overwrites the LUA changes to configure. :-(

pre-configure:
        ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '/LIBLUA_LIBS/s/lua5\.[0-9]/lua-${LUA_VER}/' \
            -e '/PKG_CONFIG/s/lua5\.[0-9]/lua-${LUA_VER}/'               \

--
Herbert
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to