Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-04-03 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Dominic Fandrey píše v pá 03. 04. 2009 v 11:46 +0200: >> Pav Lucistnik wrote: >>> Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200: >>> > Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the > port being upgraded, then look up this value in sec

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-04-03 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Dominic Fandrey píše v pá 03. 04. 2009 v 11:46 +0200: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200: > > > >>> Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the > >>> port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX > >

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-04-03 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200: > >>> Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the >>> port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX >>> file. >>> >> I don't see how this is connected to my question.

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-04-01 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200: > > Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the > > port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX > > file. > > > > I don't see how this is connected to my question. > > I want people to

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-03-31 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Dominic Fandrey píše v so 28. 03. 2009 v 19:23 +0100: > >> I'm working on a binary package upgrade tool that gets all required >> information from the INDEX file downloadable from the package >> repositories. This means you do not need a local copy of the ports >> tree to us

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-03-30 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Dominic Fandrey píše v so 28. 03. 2009 v 19:23 +0100: > I'm working on a binary package upgrade tool that gets all required > information from the INDEX file downloadable from the package > repositories. This means you do not need a local copy of the ports > tree to use it. > > The only informati