Dominic Fandrey píše v so 28. 03. 2009 v 19:23 +0100: > I'm working on a binary package upgrade tool that gets all required > information from the INDEX file downloadable from the package > repositories. This means you do not need a local copy of the ports > tree to use it. > > The only information required and missing is the LATEST_LINK. > Normally this is easily done by stripping the package name of > the version, but some ports define a proprietary LATEST_LINK > to avoid conflicts. This leads to the following problem, my > program has to do some guessing and in these cases it fails: > > # pkg_upgrade firefox3 > # > > # pkg_upgrade firefox > www/firefox;firefox-2.0.0.20_4,1 > www/firefox3;firefox-3.0.7,1 > # > > It either matches none or more than one port. I could build > some guessing logic, but the real solution would be to have > the LATEST_LINK name in the index file. Is there any chance > a LATEST_LINK column will be added if I file a PR?
Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the
port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX
file.
--
Pav Lucistnik <p...@oook.cz>
<p...@freebsd.org>
It's now using GIFs instead of JPEGs. This is similar to replacing
triangular wheels with round ones.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
