On 10/09/2019 3:28 am, Paul Macdonald via freebsd-ports wrote:
Hi,
dovecot is not building on FreeBSD 12.0-REL if lua support is not
selected, but does build if it is.
===> Registering installation for dovecot-2.3.8
pkg-static: Unable to access file
/var/ports/basejail/usr/ports/mail/dovecot/
On 05/23/2019 10:03 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
Correct. There is no port tree. Packages are used exclusively
pkg(8) doesn't handle the MOVED file. Therefore, the pkg delete/pkg add
is the correct answer.
Whether it should is out of my control.
Larry Rosenman
mail/dovecot{,-pigeonhole} maintai
Correct. There is no port tree. Packages are used exclusively
> On May 23, 2019, at 01:16, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and
>> dovecot2 package has remained stagnant.
>
> You didn't
On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie wrote:
> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and
> dovecot2 package has remained stagnant.
You didn't replace your port tree when you upgraded to 12.0-RELEASE.
I think that portsnap fetch extract ensures your ports tree m
> On 22 May 2019, at 16:23, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> Doug Hardie wrote on 2019/05/23 00:41:
>
> [...]
>
>> Unless you notice this interesting anomaly, you can get easily burned like I
>> did. I would recommend that either the dovecot2 package be deleted, or at
>> least k
Doug Hardie wrote on 2019/05/23 00:41:
[...]
Unless you notice this interesting anomaly, you can get easily burned like I
did. I would recommend that either the dovecot2 package be deleted, or at
least kept current with the dovecot package.
There is no dovecot2 package in the official Free
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> "Julian H. Stacey" writes:
>
> > Thanks, how do I generate a self signed certficate ?
>
> /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/SSL.CertificateCreation.txt
> covers it, but you can probably get by with
> /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/QuickConfiguration.txt
Great thanks b
"Julian H. Stacey" writes:
> Thanks, how do I generate a self signed certficate ?
/usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/SSL.CertificateCreation.txt
covers it, but you can probably get by with
/usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/QuickConfiguration.txt
___
fre
Hi, Reference:
> From: Larry Rosenman
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:54:44 -0500
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 03/11/2019 10:46 am, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Hi ports@
> > Anyone else seen this or got ideas please:
> > cd /usr/local/etc/rc.d; ./dovecot start
> > Can't open file /e
On Mar 28 18 21:29, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 7 Mar, 2018, at 15:18, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
Thanks Adam, its very reassuring to know that you'll "dogfood" the
update prior to releasing to FreeBSD ports users. This is one of
those high impact updates that need it - like sendmail, samba,
he
On 7 Mar, 2018, at 15:18, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
Thanks Adam, its very reassuring to know that you'll "dogfood" the update
prior to releasing to FreeBSD ports users. This is one of those high
impact updates that need it - like sendmail, samba, heimdal, squid,
nginx, apache ... ;)
Ki
On 7 Mar, 2018, at 15:18, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
Thanks Adam, its very reassuring to know that you'll "dogfood" the update
prior to releasing to FreeBSD ports users. This is one of those high
impact updates that need it - like sendmail, samba, heimdal, squid,
nginx, apache ... ;)
Ki
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:11:05PM +, Matt Smith wrote:
> On Mar 07 09:17, The Doctor wrote:
> >What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
> >
>
> You, constantly asking this list why they haven't upgraded any ports to
> the latest versions but not actually providing any patches yourself to
> h
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:15:30AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On 7 Mar, 2018, at 9:17, The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
>
> There are simply a lot of regressions in 2.3. Many of them have been fixed
> upstream, but only the showstoppers made it into 2.3.0
On 7 Mar, 2018, at 9:17, The Doctor wrote:
What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
There are simply a lot of regressions in 2.3. Many of them have been fixed
upstream, but only the showstoppers made it into 2.3.0.1. The rest of the
fixes will be released with 2.3.1 later this month. 2.2.x
On Mar 07 09:17, The Doctor wrote:
What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
You, constantly asking this list why they haven't upgraded any ports to
the latest versions but not actually providing any patches yourself to
help the volunteers do this more quickly.
--
Matt
__
On 2016-11-02 18:03, The Doctor wrote:
I see we are having issues with dovecot 2.226.0 in the FreeBSD world.
What issues?
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscri
On 02/18/14 18:54, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Hi Andrei,
Andrei Brezan:
You can check /var/db/ports/postfix/options to see what options you
have for postfix. I think it's easier if you can tell us the output
of "uname -a" plus the exact command you try when you get this error.
I'm not sure what you
Hi Andrei,
Andrei Brezan:
You can check /var/db/ports/postfix/options to see what options you
have for postfix. I think it's easier if you can tell us the output
of "uname -a" plus the exact command you try when you get this
error. I'm not sure what you want to achieve,
Jos Chrispijn schreef:
Just got an error on Dovecot ports.
As shown I use dovecot 1.x but for some reason v2.x want to install
(Postfix maybe?)
===> dovecot2-2.2.10 conflicts with installed package(s):
dovecot-1.2.17
They install files into the same place.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Benjamin Podszun
wrote:
> Hey there.
>
> Setting up a machine with ansible, stumbling upon a couple of problems. The
> current issue? Part of my automated setup calls
>
> service dovecot start
>
> and .. that succeeds always, if dovecot_enable="YES" is missing (w
On 02/18/14 16:46, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Just got an error on Dovecot ports.
As shown I use dovecot 1.x but for some reason v2.x want to install
(Postfix maybe?)
===> dovecot2-2.2.10 conflicts with installed package(s):
dovecot-1.2.17
They install files into th
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:56:18 AM CEST, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Benjamin Podszun <
benjamin.pods...@gmail.com> wrote:
service dovecot start
and .. that succeeds always, if dovecot_enable="YES" is missing (which
totally is an error on my part, obvio
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Benjamin Podszun <
benjamin.pods...@gmail.com> wrote:
> service dovecot start
>
> and .. that succeeds always, if dovecot_enable="YES" is missing (which
> totally is an error on my part, obviously).
>
> What I expect though is the typical "Can't do that, Dave. Try
RW:
In practice managesieve support isn't widespread enough for it to be a
sole mean of updating scripts, so it's common to provide a webpage for
the purpose, which may use managesieve as a standard interface. Going
through managesieve prevents a script with syntax errors overwriting a
working
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:42:20 +0100
Niclas Zeising wrote:
> As far as I can tell, dovecot-managesieve is the server part of sieve.
> You can have it running to be able to use a sieve client to define
> your sieve programs, instead of having to log on to the mail server
> and edit a script file on
On 2011-02-21 20:13, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> I want to define mail filters for incoming mail in order to have them in
> the right folders once I check my mail with my mobile phone (when not
> having my IMAP client incl. rules online). Running with Dovecont
> already, I have been advised in this list
FYI for all concerned
On 10/18/2010 10:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:47 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
So, my question is, respectfully, is dovecot V2.0.5 stable enough
for prime-time on a busy ISP mail server?
It's getting better :) I'll make 2.0.6 release this week agai
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 08:01:39AM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 August 2009 20:11:22 Wesley Shields wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:19:37PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> >
> >>> I was previously overruled by a committer when I filed a PR to default
> >>> ManageSieve t
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Saturday 29 August 2009 20:11:22 Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:19:37PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
I was previously overruled by a committer when I filed a PR to default
ManageSieve to ON. IIRC, POLA was sited as the reason. I'm still of
the opinion that the
On Saturday 29 August 2009 20:11:22 Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:19:37PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> > I was previously overruled by a committer when I filed a PR to default
> > ManageSieve to ON. IIRC, POLA was sited as the reason. I'm still of
> > the opinion that the ManageSi
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:19:37PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:06:23PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> >> Wesley Shields wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:47:42PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot de
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:06:23PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:47:42PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
RW wrote:
When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working. It
appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:06:23PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:47:42PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> >> RW wrote:
> >>> When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working. It
> >>> appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded, but
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:47:42PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
RW wrote:
When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working. It
appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded, but it's
switched from the CMU version to Dovecot's own implementation.
This
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:47:42PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working. It
> > appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded, but it's
> > switched from the CMU version to Dovecot's own implementation.
> >
> > This shou
RW wrote:
When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working. It
appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded, but it's
switched from the CMU version to Dovecot's own implementation.
This should be documented in UPDATING - it's not covered by the
previous Dovecot note
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:50:37 +0800
Denny Lin wrote:
>
> > When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working.
> > It appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded, but
> > it's switched from the CMU version to Dovecot's own implementation.
> > This should be documented
> When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working. It
> appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded, but it's
> switched from the CMU version to Dovecot's own implementation.
> This should be documented in UPDATING - it's not covered by the
> previous Dovecot note.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 02:01:27PM +0200, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
> The configuration file of dovecot 1.1 will most likely not work for Dovecot
> 1.2
>
> Shouldn't this be mentioned in UPDATING?
>
> See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.2
Yes, I will get something in there now. Sorry for th
>> dovecot
>> listen = [::]
>> used to listen on ipv4 port as well as ipv6. after cvsup and world
>> build, it is ipv6 only.
>
> It's one of changes in dovecot 1.1 from 1.0. Read the thread starting
> with following message:
>
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-June/031733.html
domo
From: Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dovecot listen
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:55:13 +0900
> dovecot
> listen = [::]
> used to listen on ipv4 port as well as ipv6. after cvsup and world
> build, it is ipv6 only.
It's one of changes in dovecot 1.1 from 1.0. Read the thread starting
wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.1.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.1.tar.gz.sig
>
> Hopefully this release lives a bit longer than v1.1.0.
>
> - Maildir: When migrating from v1.0 with ol
43 matches
Mail list logo
