On 7 Mar, 2018, at 15:18, Dewayne Geraghty
<dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au> wrote:
Thanks Adam, its very reassuring to know that you'll "dogfood" the update
prior to releasing to FreeBSD ports users. This is one of those high
impact updates that need it - like sendmail, samba, heimdal, squid,
nginx, apache ... ;)
Kind regards, Dewayne
PS dogfood is a peculiar term where, typically a supplier, uses what they
provide to others. As an example: I first came across the term when HP
Management wanted to demonstrate to their external customers that they
use the same services internally as supplied externally. (I could write a
short-story...)
Thanks Dewayne,
Dogfooding is why 2.3 wasn't committed. Larry didn't have problems with the
upgrade, but I ran into a number of them on my own server, including some
showstoppers (especially one that caused all incoming attachments to get
mangled).
I have every intention of committing 2.3.1 once it gets released, though if
it happens right at the end of the month, I may wait a few days for 2018Q2
to get branched beforehand---I'd like for the kinks to be worked out in
head before it hits quarterly.
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
