Re: New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-13 Thread Torsten Zuehlsdorff
Aloha, Why not teach pkg-audit(8) to query NVD based on CPE annotations in *binary* packages? Doing so would also provide a workaround for VuXML entries cancelled to reduce bloat. I agree, pkg-audit needs to be taught to do that. Along those lines, we could create a port for cvechecker: h

Re: New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-10 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 10.10.17 um 00:03 schrieb Steve Wills: > Hi, > > On 10/09/2017 17:55, Jan Beich wrote: >> Why not >> teach pkg-audit(8) to query NVD based on CPE annotations in *binary* >> packages? >> Doing so would also provide a workaround for VuXML entries cancelled >> to reduce bloat. > > I agree, pkg-au

Re: New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-09 Thread Steve Wills
Hi, On 10/09/2017 17:55, Jan Beich wrote: Steve Wills writes: Hi, On 10/09/2017 16:34, Jan Beich wrote: Matthew Seaman writes: On 09/10/2017 16:57, Roger Marquis wrote: Can anyone say what mechanisms the ports-security team might have in place to monitor CVEs and port software versions

Re: New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-09 Thread Jan Beich
Steve Wills writes: > Hi, > > On 10/09/2017 16:34, Jan Beich wrote: >> Matthew Seaman writes: >> >>> On 09/10/2017 16:57, Roger Marquis wrote: >>> Can anyone say what mechanisms the ports-security team might have in place to monitor CVEs and port software versions? > > I've been hacki

Re: New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-09 Thread Steve Wills
Hi, On 10/09/2017 16:34, Jan Beich wrote: Matthew Seaman writes: On 09/10/2017 16:57, Roger Marquis wrote: Can anyone say what mechanisms the ports-security team might have in place to monitor CVEs and port software versions? I've been hacking at a prototype for scanning what I can find:

Re: New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-09 Thread Jan Beich
Matthew Seaman writes: > On 09/10/2017 16:57, Roger Marquis wrote: > >> The reason I ask is CVE-2017-12617 was announced almost a week ago yet >> there's no mention of it in the vulnerability database  The tomcat8 >> port's Makefile also still points to the older, vulnerable version. >> Tomcat is

Re: New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-09 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 09/10/2017 16:57, Roger Marquis wrote: > The reason I ask is CVE-2017-12617 was announced almost a week ago yet > there's no mention of it in the vulnerability database  The tomcat8 > port's Makefile also still points to the older, vulnerable version. > Tomcat is one of those popular, internet-f

Re: New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-09 Thread User
Hello, They go by the public cve announcements. The audit db might be slow on updatingBut really you should be following CVEs for any software you use yourself that is mission critical On Oct 9, 2017 11:01 AM, "Roger Marquis" wrote: > Can anyone say what mechanisms the ports-security team might

New pkg audit FNs

2017-10-09 Thread Roger Marquis
Can anyone say what mechanisms the ports-security team might have in place to monitor CVEs and port software versions? The reason I ask is CVE-2017-12617 was announced almost a week ago yet there's no mention of it in the vulnerability database The tomcat8 port's Makefile also still points to th