Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 1:01 PM Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > > On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: > > > > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > > > > > > > I would like to

Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: > > > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > > > > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > Thanks, Neel! > > [s

Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports

On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: Hi freebsd-ports@, I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: Thanks, Neel! [snip] net/librsync2 sysutils/ioping sysutils/pick Hi, If no one has already stepped up, I'd

Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > [snip] > net/librsync2 > sysutils/ioping > sysutils/pick Hi, If no one has already stepped up, I'd like to try my hand at maintaining these three

Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports

Thanks for all your hard work Neel! On Friday, March 27, 2020, Neel Chauhan wrote: > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > > databases/py-mysqlclient > deskutils/go-for-it > devel/grpc > devel/libnsutils > devel/libparserutils > devel/netsurf-build

Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > > databases/py-mysqlclient > deskutils/go-for-it > devel/grpc > devel/libnsutils > devel/libparserutils > devel/netsurf-buildsystem > devel/nsgenbi

Dropping maintainership of my Ports

Hi freebsd-ports@, I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: databases/py-mysqlclient deskutils/go-for-it devel/grpc devel/libnsutils devel/libparserutils devel/netsurf-buildsystem devel/nsgenbind dns/libnspsl emulators/nestopia graphics/cloudcompare graphics/glfw graphics/lib

Re: Will 10.3 clobber my ports area?

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Kevin Oberman wrote: [ Reloading ports ] > Of course. You can use portsnap(8) to do this. See 4.5 - Using the Ports > Collection > > for details. It's quite trivial. This also will give you the la

Re: Will 10.3 clobber my ports area?

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > The ports will not be touched, but some will not run on 10.3 because of > > ABI changes in some shareable libraries. Most of the base system uses > > versioned symbols, so will work fine, but som

Re: Will 10.3 clobber my ports area?

On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Oh, this is for Joseph Mingrove: my mail log shows a message from you > (relayed via FreeBSD.org) but there's nothing in my mailbox about it > (and it certainly wasn't rejected). I guess I accidentally deleted it, > so could you please send it again?

Re: Will 10.3 clobber my ports area?

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, Kevin Oberman wrote: > The ports will not be touched, but some will not run on 10.3 because of > ABI changes in some shareable libraries. Most of the base system uses > versioned symbols, so will work fine, but some, usually contributed > code, don't. Ports that use them wil

Re: Will 10.3 clobber my ports area?

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Assuming the binary upgrade from 9.3 to 10.3 is "clean" i.e. it won't > clobber any of my local stuff (this is my only FreeBSD server), what will > happen to the ports area? Left alone, saved, or overwritten with/without > any local chnages?

Will 10.3 clobber my ports area?

Assuming the binary upgrade from 9.3 to 10.3 is "clean" i.e. it won't clobber any of my local stuff (this is my only FreeBSD server), what will happen to the ports area? Left alone, saved, or overwritten with/without any local chnages? -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understan

Re: Rebuilding my ports area

On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:21:07 +1000 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote > FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p20 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Jul 21 19:29:33 UTC 2015 > > Having completely scragged my ports area following various changes to > pkg/pkgng/etc, and being unable to "sysinstall" it from CD (not fo

Re: Rebuilding my ports area

On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, David Wolfskill wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:21:07PM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote: FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p20 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Jul 21 19:29:33 UTC 2015 Having completely scragged my ports area following various changes to pkg/pkgng/etc, and being unable to "sysin

Re: Rebuilding my ports area

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:21:07PM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote: > FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p20 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Jul 21 19:29:33 UTC 2015 > > Having completely scragged my ports area following various changes to > pkg/pkgng/etc, and being unable to "sysinstall" it from CD (not fo

Rebuilding my ports area

FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p20 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Jul 21 19:29:33 UTC 2015 Having completely scragged my ports area following various changes to pkg/pkgng/etc, and being unable to "sysinstall" it from CD (not found for some reason) or via FTP (not found on server etc), I found a pristin

Re: Getting rid of my ports

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I am retiring at the end of January. I will no longer be able to maintain > ports (nor will I have much interest in doing so), so I need volunteers to > take them over. They should all be up to date (although I haven't checked > today.) > > Here's t

Re: Getting rid of my ports

Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> Port: byaccj-1.15 >>> Port: chaosreader-0.94_1 >> >> I'd be happy to adopt the above two. > > You have those two. Thanks. I can submit PRs tomorrow (new maintainer address, additional distfile mirror, etc.) if you want. AvW -- Imbibo, ergo sum. pgpRtqAHl9

Re: Getting rid of my ports

Hi! > > Port: byaccj-1.15 > > Port: chaosreader-0.94_1 > > I'd be happy to adopt the above two. You have those two. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Getting rid of my ports

Paul Schmehl wrote: > I will no longer be able to maintain ports [snip] > so I need volunteers to take them over. [snip] > Port: byaccj-1.15 > Port: chaosreader-0.94_1 I'd be happy to adopt the above two. Regards, AvW -- Imbibo, ergo sum. pgpT3Z5CEgyKN.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Getting rid of my ports

Hi, I would like to volunteer. BR, Muhammad On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I am retiring at the end of January. I will no longer be able to maintain > ports (nor will I have much interest in doing so), so I need volunteers to > take them over. They should all be up to

Getting rid of my ports

I am retiring at the end of January. I will no longer be able to maintain ports (nor will I have much interest in doing so), so I need volunteers to take them over. They should all be up to date (although I haven't checked today.) Here's the list: # make search key="pa...@utdallas.edu" | gr

Re: Keeping my ports tree in sync with the public pkg repo

On 6/12/2014 6:42 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 06:11:13AM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: Is there a way to determine the ports tree revision used for the current public pkg repo? Right now you have no way but knowing that we take a snapshot of the ports tree at 1am UTC

Re: Keeping my ports tree in sync with the public pkg repo

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 06:11:13AM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Is there a way to determine the ports tree revision used for the current > public pkg repo? > Right now you have no way but knowing that we take a snapshot of the ports tree at 1am UTC every wednesday and build on it With pkg 1.3

Keeping my ports tree in sync with the public pkg repo

Is there a way to determine the ports tree revision used for the current public pkg repo? Like any moderately complex system, I have a mix of stock and custom packages. When I go to update stuff, I'll check out the current ports tree and fire off poudrerie to build what I need. There's a rac

Having a problem updating my ports 9.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p10 #715 r261208: Mon Jan 27 06:45:50 CST 2014 on AMD64

** [all-recursive] Error 1 *** [do-build] Error code 1 I usually keep my ports up to date but I got a few days or weeks behind. That could be part of my problem. I am and have been using portmaster to update and have updated most but am stumped here. Any suggestions appreciated. ed <http://www.fa

[MAINTAINER] These are my Ports after updated USES= and other necessary changes

Please have a look, test as needed and commit these diffs. I am open to comments & suggestions, and I have not forgotten my older problem reports either. Earlier I missed out on ${MKDIR} variable please add it as @${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR} When i have forgot to change and similar ${MKDIR} please co

Re: pkg has screwed up my ports

On 10/15/2012 10:37 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 10/15/2012 10:07 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: >> This morning I updated my ports tree using svn, then ran portmaster -L >> to check outdated ports. portmaster was one of those ports. >> >> I then ran portmaster -a

Re: pkg has screwed up my ports

On 10/15/2012 10:07 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > This morning I updated my ports tree using svn, then ran portmaster -L > to check outdated ports. portmaster was one of those ports. > > I then ran portmaster -a . it prompted me to select options from the > blue options scr

Re: pkg has screwed up my ports

15.10.2012 18:07, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: This morning I updated my ports tree using svn, then ran portmaster -L to check outdated ports. portmaster was one of those ports. I then ran portmaster -a . it prompted me to select options from the blue options screen, I selected pkgng support

pkg has screwed up my ports

This morning I updated my ports tree using svn, then ran portmaster -L to check outdated ports. portmaster was one of those ports. I then ran portmaster -a . it prompted me to select options from the blue options screen, I selected pkgng support. Anyway, the update of portmaster failed. I ran

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:13:11PM -0500, Graham Todd wrote: > > I doubt this simpler approach would be "ITIL compliant" ;) but since > that is not a goal and the bulk of anything to do with licenses involves > lawyers anyway, the ports/pkg system should probably try to do as little > as possible

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On 01/18/2012 04:34, Johan van Selst wrote: > Nikola Lečić wrote: >> Anyway, it wasn't clear from the bsd.licenses.mk that we should >> use 'multi' in situations of 'any later version'. This means that >> all licensing info of eg. GPL2+ ports must be updated when GPL4 >> appears... > > No, we shou

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

Nikola Lečić wrote: > Anyway, it wasn't clear from the bsd.licenses.mk that we should use > 'multi' in situations of 'any later version'. This means that all > licensing info of eg. GPL2+ ports must be updated when GPL4 appears... No, we should not use this. Not just because of the potential of ha

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

Hi, On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/17/2012 14:35, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > > Anything can go wrong, but it is (IMO) quite easy to state the intention > of > > the FreeBSD Project in this case. > > You're making the very common mistake of assuming that the law has

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On 01/17/2012 14:35, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Anything can go wrong, but it is (IMO) quite easy to state the intention of > the FreeBSD Project in this case. You're making the very common mistake of assuming that the law has anything to do with reality. It doesn't. The fact that we're making cla

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

Hello, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:38:08AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >> >>> On 01/17/2012 03:56, Vitaly Magerya wrote: >>> Eitan Adler wrote: > 1) Will licensing section ever appear i

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Chad Perrin wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:38:08AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 01/17/2012 03:56, Vitaly Magerya wrote: Eitan Adler wrote: 1) Will licensing section ever appear in the Porters Handbook? :-) Yes Is someone actually working on it? If so, and is there

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On 17 Jan 2012 18:43, "Chad Perrin" wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:38:08AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 01/17/2012 03:56, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > > > Eitan Adler wrote: > > >>> 1) Will licensing section ever appear in the Porters Handbook? :-) > > >> > > >> Yes > > > > > > Is someone ac

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:38:08AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/17/2012 03:56, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > > Eitan Adler wrote: > >>> 1) Will licensing section ever appear in the Porters Handbook? :-) > >> > >> Yes > > > > Is someone actually working on it? If so, and is there some sort of > > ta

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On 01/17/2012 03:56, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Eitan Adler wrote: >>> 1) Will licensing section ever appear in the Porters Handbook? :-) >> >> Yes > > Is someone actually working on it? If so, and is there some sort of > target timeline? > > Back in 2010 when the framework was introduced, my genera

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

Eitan Adler wrote: >> 1) Will licensing section ever appear in the Porters Handbook? :-) > > Yes Is someone actually working on it? If so, and is there some sort of target timeline? Back in 2010 when the framework was introduced, my general impression was that maintainers where advised to wait w

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:40:35AM +0300, Nikola Lečić wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:14:57PM -0500 Eitan Adler [email address > elided] wrote: > > 2012/1/16 Nikola Lečić : > > > > > > 6) I need three new items added to the licenses database because they > > >   should be considered as 'known'

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

2012/1/16 Nikola Lečić : > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:14:57PM -0500 >  in >  Eitan Adler wrote: > >> 2012/1/16 Nikola Lečić : > [...] >> > 3) Intentionally no difference between 2- and 3-clause BSD? >> >> I hope not. We should probably have a BSD2, BSD3, and BSD4 license. >> For now mark it with

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:14:57PM -0500 in Eitan Adler wrote: > 2012/1/16 Nikola Lečić : [...] > > 3) Intentionally no difference between 2- and 3-clause BSD? > > I hope not. We should probably have a BSD2, BSD3, and BSD4 license. > For now mark it with a comment (or offer a patch to the d

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

2012/1/16 Nikola Lečić : > Hello, > > I'm about to add licensing info to all my 25 ports. I hoped that a > chapter dedicated to licensing issues would appear in the Porters > Handbook, but since this hasn't happened so far, I decided to try > without it. > > Here are my questions; sorry if some of

Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

Hello, I'm about to add licensing info to all my 25 ports. I hoped that a chapter dedicated to licensing issues would appear in the Porters Handbook, but since this hasn't happened so far, I decided to try without it. Here are my questions; sorry if some of them are already answered in the past.

Re: giving up maintainership for all my ports

On 10/31/11 21:45, Russell Jackson wrote: > textproc/rubygem-augeas now owned by ruby@ -- 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member,

Re: giving up maintainership for all my ports

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 10/31/11 17:45, Russell Jackson wrote: > These are all up for grabs. > > sysutils/puppet > textproc/augeas > textproc/rubygem-augeas > sysutils/mcollective > I've taken sysutils/puppet and sysutils/mcollective. Thanks, hope to see you back

giving up maintainership for all my ports

These are all up for grabs. sysutils/puppet textproc/augeas textproc/rubygem-augeas sysutils/mcollective -- Russell A. Jackson Network Analyst California State University, Bakersfield ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 10:01:48PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'd like to take maintainership of > > astro/xearth > textproc/urlview done. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:13:37PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote: > >> If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the > >> following ports to po...@freebsd.org: > >> > > > > I'm interesting in maintaing of this ports: > > > >> multimedia/gpodder > >> sysutils/rdup > > > >

Re: Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/2/11 3:55 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Hi! > So can pleas anybody assign me as maintainer for this ports? > > Исходное сообщение > Тема: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports > Дата: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 0

Re: Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

03.05.2011 00:13, Greg Larkin пишет: multimedia/gpodder sysutils/rdup Hi Ruslan, I just assigned those ports to you. Thank you for volunteering! Cheers, Greg Thank you, Greg! -- Regards, Ruslan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http:

Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

Hi! So can pleas anybody assign me as maintainer for this ports? Исходное сообщение Тема: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports Дата: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:12:54 +0400 От: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Кому: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org 27.04.2011 05:43, Charlie Kester пишет: Well, due

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:23:23AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Maybe, if maintainer can "somehow easily" become ports committer, > this hurdle might be lower ? This has been discussed before. The barrier to entry is currently set at the "seems to be willing to work on FreeBSD over a period of man

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

Eitan Adler wrote: > > I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons > > to save any unmaintained port, > > What you have been told is "no-one steps up to (a) fix the > problem, (b) take maintainership and (c) _continue_ with > maintainership ... > > If you are stepping up to do the wor

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On 27 April 2011 13:54, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Eitan Adler wrote: >> Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports >> features take a lot of time.  Furthermore adding a port seems to be a >> "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if it is >> formatted badly (b) test it in a tinde

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

Eitan Adler wrote: > There is a lot of work that has to be done in the background even if > no new ports are added. Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports > features take a lot of time. Furthermore adding a port seems to be a > "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:35:58AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:49:58 +0200 > Erik Trulsson articulated: > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > > > On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > Every response from t

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

> So, if the maintainers of the small leaf ports would be able > to commit their work themselves, it would free the ports committers > with the large ports projects on their hands to work on those ? > > Would this work ? If you look through this list's archives I actually proposed this idea myself

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

Eitan Adler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Then you have misunderstood things. I don't think anybody would be > > unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of > > the currently unmaintained ports. > > > There are two things. Becoming a

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

If after this thread you still want to drop maintership I'd like the following: >>> deskutils/teapot >>> math/ised >>> security/ccrypt >>> sysutils/moreutils >>> sysutils/moreutils-parallel >> I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons to save any > unmaintained port, What you have b

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:49:58 +0200 Erik Trulsson articulated: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > > On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote: > > > > > >You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports > > >wasn't met with enthusiasm.

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

Hi! > > No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that many of the > > committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some of the > > ports I might identify as "popular", because it would interfere with > > their plans to trim the portstree. > Then you have misunderstood th

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote: > > > >You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports > >wasn't met with enthusiasm. > > > > No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that ma

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote: You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports wasn't met with enthusiasm. No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that many of the committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some of the p

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On 4/27/2011 8:09 AM, Charlie Kester wrote: I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons to save any unmaintained port, and I was specifically told this in response to my efforts to identify ports that have a lot of users. So I don't think current policy supports the conclusion that

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

are slowing or dropping out. Enuf, -g . On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:43:43PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:43:43 -0700 > From: Charlie Kester > Subject: Dropping maintainership of my ports > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-p

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 22:15:58 PDT Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further discussion, I don't think I can continue working with t

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: > > Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these > deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further > discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. > So I'm stepping down. > > If no o

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

27.04.2011 05:43, Charlie Kester пишет: Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. So I'm stepping down. If no one else wants to maintain

Dropping maintainership of my ports

Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. So I'm stepping down. If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the

Re: Should I be adding LICENSE info to my ports?

info in the author's manpage, website, or other documentation. I'm not going to submit a flurry of PR's to add this to all my ports, but I will begin gathering the info so I can include it as part of any other updates. ___ freebsd-ports@freeb

Re: Should I be adding LICENSE info to my ports?

Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:17:29 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > > > Today on FreshPorts I see some bulk commits adding LICENSE info to > > 40+ ports. And I've noticed LICENSE being added in many other recent > > commits. > > Right, ehaupt@ updated several of his ports to incl

Re: Should I be adding LICENSE info to my ports?

On Tue 25 Jan 2011 at 19:46:36 PST Sahil Tandon wrote: It's entirely up to you; no requirement. Understood, thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "f

Re: Should I be adding LICENSE info to my ports?

On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:17:29 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > Today on FreshPorts I see some bulk commits adding LICENSE info to 40+ > ports. And I've noticed LICENSE being added in many other recent > commits. Right, ehaupt@ updated several of his ports to include LICENSE. > But I still don't s

Should I be adding LICENSE info to my ports?

Today on FreshPorts I see some bulk commits adding LICENSE info to 40+ ports. And I've noticed LICENSE being added in many other recent commits. But I still don't see anything in the Porter's Handbook about how maintainers should use this infrastructure in their ports. I thought we were waiti

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On 9/28/10 2:34 AM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: > >> On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote: >>> x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more >> >> I use this and can take maintainership. > > You have been set as

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote: >> x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more > > I use this and can take maintainership. You have been set as the maintainer. Thanks!

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote: x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more I use this and can take maintainership. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

On Sep 27, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > 27.09.2010 23:32, Tobias Roth пишет: >> Hi >> >> I haven't been using FreeBSD as a desktop for a while now, and am thus >> dropping maintainerships of my ports. If anyone wants to step up and >> ta

Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports

27.09.2010 23:32, Tobias Roth пишет: Hi I haven't been using FreeBSD as a desktop for a while now, and am thus dropping maintainerships of my ports. If anyone wants to step up and take over maintainership, please send me an email. For everything left over, I will send PRs to rese

Dropping maintainership of my ports

Hi I haven't been using FreeBSD as a desktop for a while now, and am thus dropping maintainerships of my ports. If anyone wants to step up and take over maintainership, please send me an email. For everything left over, I will send PRs to reset the maintainer to ports@ in about two weeks.

Re: Stepping down from my ports

On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 13:16:49 -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Fri 06 Aug 2010 at 11:51:05 PDT Frank Steinborn wrote: > > > >multimedia/gpodder > > I can take this one. Done. -- Sahil Tandon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: Stepping down from my ports

On Fri 06 Aug 2010 at 11:51:05 PDT Frank Steinborn wrote: multimedia/gpodder I can take this one. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsub

Stepping down from my ports

Dear porters, unfortunately I need to step down from all the FreeBSD ports that I currently maintain, namely: audio/ices0 audio/linux-shoutcast audio/shoutcast benchmarks/nbench devel/libgee games/avanor games/crimson games/wrogue irc/minbif misc/apparix multimedia/gpodder net-im/pino net-mgmt/na

Re: My ports.

You are right, it is the best way. I supposed to have done it a couple of months ago, but unfortunately my free time isn't enough, right now. Thanks again. 2010/3/11 Pietro Cerutti > On 2010-Mar-11, 15:59, Marcelo wrote: > > Please, go ahead, they need an update urgently. > > Thanks to care on

Re: My ports.

On 2010-Mar-11, 15:59, Marcelo wrote: > Please, go ahead, they need an update urgently. > Thanks to care on they. Actually, I'm thinking about dropping support for fox12 :) I'll DEPRECATE it and remove it in a few weeks. In the process, I'll drop x11-toolkits/fxscintilla-fox12, x11-toolkits/ruby-

Re: My ports.

Please, go ahead, they need an update urgently. Thanks to care on they. 2010/3/11 Pietro Cerutti > On 2010-Mar-11, 15:00, Marcelo wrote: > > Hi dear Pietro, > > Hi Marcelo, > > > Which one do you intend to catch it up in your hands? > > > > I'll take these. > > > > > > x11-toolkits/fox12 > > >

Re: My ports.

On 2010-Mar-11, 15:00, Marcelo wrote: > Hi dear Pietro, Hi Marcelo, > Which one do you intend to catch it up in your hands? > > I'll take these. > > > > x11-toolkits/fox12 > > x11-toolkits/fox14 > > x11-toolkits/fox16 Uhm, eh? -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project g...@freebsd.org PGP Public

Re: My ports.

Hi dear Pietro, Which one do you intend to catch it up in your hands? Fell free and go ahead! Best Regards, 2010/3/11 Pietro Cerutti > On 2010-Feb-22, 08:48, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > There are some ports that I haven't interested and neither used anymore, > > so I'm here to

Re: My ports.

On 2010-Feb-22, 08:48, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > Hi guys, > > There are some ports that I haven't interested and neither used anymore, > so I'm here to check if there is anyone that would be interested to push > them and maintain those updated before set up those to po...@. > > Please, send me a li

Re: My ports.

Hi dear Eitan, It was done. Thanks. 2010/3/3 Marcelo > Hi dear, > > Tomorrow I'll pass these to you... > > Thanks. > > 2010/2/28 Eitan Adler > > I'll take these: >> >> > sysutils/googlog >> > textproc/align >> > x11/xbindkeys >> > > > > -- > Marcelo Araujo > ara...@freebsd.org > -- Marce

Re: My ports.

Hi dear, Tomorrow I'll pass these to you... Thanks. 2010/2/28 Eitan Adler > I'll take these: > > > sysutils/googlog > > textproc/align > > x11/xbindkeys > -- Marcelo Araujo ara...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://list

Re: My ports.

I'll take these: > sysutils/googlog > textproc/align > x11/xbindkeys ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: My ports.

Hey Marcelo- On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:48 AM, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > Hi guys, > > There are some ports that I haven't interested and neither used anymore, > so I'm here to check if there is anyone that would be interested to push > them and maintain those updated before set up those to po...@. > >

Re: My ports.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith < step...@missouri.edu> wrote: > Marcelo Araujo wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> There are some ports that I haven't interested and neither used anymore, >> so I'm here to check if there is anyone that would be interested to push >> them and main

Re: My ports.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Marcelo Araujo wrote in <20100222114814.gb29...@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> on Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:48:14 -0300: > print/libotf I should take this one since I already maintain m17n-project ports. - -- Nikola Lečić = Никола Лечић fingerprin

  1   2   >