Hi!
> John Baldwin ha scritto:
> > This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages
> > (and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely,
> > some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODBC, and some other
> > package that KDE depends on w
John Baldwin writes:
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:20:06 pm Alex Dupre wrote:
>> Even if it could be simpler (is it?), I think unixODBC is a more common
>> choice these days, so changing the KDE ports could be better.
>>
>> A few stats:
>> - ports supporting both unixODBC and iODBC: 17
>> - po
On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:20:06 pm Alex Dupre wrote:
> John Baldwin ha scritto:
> > This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages
> > (and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely,
> > some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODB
John Baldwin ha scritto:
This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 packages
(and if you believe posts on the forums, 8.1 was equally broken). Namely,
some package the GNOME depends on wants to use unixODBC, and some other
package that KDE depends on wants to use libiodbc.
At work we have folks use FreeBSD desktops. To do this we install pre-package
versions of both KDE and GNOME (and a few other window managers) onto our
desktop build machine so that users can choose which environment they want.
This would appear to no longer be a supported use case in for 8.2 p
