On Fri, 29 May 2020 11:38:44 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
>Right that helped
>
>root@test:/tmp/usr/local/lib/dovecot # ldd ./libdovecot-login.so.0.0.0
>./libdovecot-login.so.0.0.0:
> libdovecot.so.0 => not found (0)
> libssl.so.11 => /us
On 29-5-2020 11:31, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 29-5-2020 00:56, Carmel NY wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2020 23:36:46 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
On 28-5-2020 16:53, Carmel NY wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
Hi,
I'm trying to get dovecot to us
On 29-5-2020 00:56, Carmel NY wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2020 23:36:46 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
On 28-5-2020 16:53, Carmel NY wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
Hi,
I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in
/usr/local/lib
On Thu, 28 May 2020 23:36:46 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
>On 28-5-2020 16:53, Carmel NY wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in
>>
On 28-5-2020 16:53, Carmel NY wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
Hi,
I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in
/usr/local/lib. But whatever I try, en en op with cryptostuff from
/usr/lib
I think the correct way is to set
etc/make
On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in
>/usr/local/lib. But whatever I try, en en op with cryptostuff from
>/usr/lib
>
>I think the correct way is to set
>etc/make.con
Hi,
I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in /usr/local/lib.
But whatever I try, en en op with cryptostuff from /usr/lib
I think the correct way is to set
etc/make.conf
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl
En though when making tells me:
dovecot-2.3.10.1 depends on
On 10/09/2019 3:28 am, Paul Macdonald via freebsd-ports wrote:
Hi,
dovecot is not building on FreeBSD 12.0-REL if lua support is not
selected, but does build if it is.
===> Registering installation for dovecot-2.3.8
pkg-static: Unable to access file
/var/ports/basejail/usr/ports/mail/dove
Hi,
dovecot is not building on FreeBSD 12.0-REL if lua support is not
selected, but does build if it is.
===> Registering installation for dovecot-2.3.8
pkg-static: Unable to access file
/var/ports/basejail/usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/stage/usr/local/%%LUA_LIBDIR%%exec/dovecot/hea
On 05/23/2019 10:03 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
Correct. There is no port tree. Packages are used exclusively
pkg(8) doesn't handle the MOVED file. Therefore, the pkg delete/pkg add
is the correct answer.
Whether it should is out of my control.
Larry Rosenman
mail/dovecot{,-pigeo
Correct. There is no port tree. Packages are used exclusively
> On May 23, 2019, at 01:16, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and
>> dovecot2 package has remai
On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie wrote:
> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and
> dovecot2 package has remained stagnant.
You didn't replace your port tree when you upgraded to 12.0-RELEASE.
I think that portsnap fetch extract ensures your
package be deleted, or at
>> least kept current with the dovecot package.
>
> There is no dovecot2 package in the official FreeBSD repository / ports tree:
> https://www.freshports.org/search.php?query=dovecot
>
> You have very stale packages on your machines and you didn
Doug Hardie wrote on 2019/05/23 00:41:
[...]
Unless you notice this interesting anomaly, you can get easily burned like I
did. I would recommend that either the dovecot2 package be deleted, or at
least kept current with the dovecot package.
There is no dovecot2 package in the official
Some years ago I setup a server with dovecot2 package. At that time there were
2 dovecot packages: dovecot which had a version of 1.x and dovecot2 which had a
version of 2.x. That made sense since dovecot v2 is quite different from v1.
As time went on I was upgrading that server to FreeBSD 12
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> "Julian H. Stacey" writes:
>
> > Thanks, how do I generate a self signed certficate ?
>
> /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/SSL.CertificateCreation.txt
> covers it, but you can probably get by with
> /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/Qu
"Julian H. Stacey" writes:
> Thanks, how do I generate a self signed certficate ?
/usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/SSL.CertificateCreation.txt
covers it, but you can probably get by with
/usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/wiki/QuickConf
Hi, Reference:
> From: Larry Rosenman
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:54:44 -0500
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 03/11/2019 10:46 am, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Hi ports@
> > Anyone else seen this or got ideas please:
> > cd /usr/local/etc/rc.d; ./dovecot st
Hi ports@
Anyone else seen this or got ideas please:
cd /usr/local/etc/rc.d; ./dovecot start
Can't open file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem
/usr/ports/mail/dovecot MAINTAINER= l...@freebsd.orgcc'd
pkg info dovecot-2.3.4.1 Secure, fast and powerful IMAP and POP3 s
Hi Larry,
Am 04.12.2018 um 12:35 schrieb Larry Rosenman:
> I inherited that port, and I just added a libsodium option in r486595.
wow, this was amazingly fast.
Thanks a lot!
Gruß
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proo
gt; > >Hi,
>> > >
>> > >I just saw that sodium is explicitely disabled:
>> > >CONFIGURE_ARGS= --localstatedir=/var \
>> > > --with-statedir=/var/db/dovecot \
>> > > --without-shadow \
>> > >
ed:
> > >CONFIGURE_ARGS= --localstatedir=/var \
> > > --with-statedir=/var/db/dovecot \
> > > --without-shadow \
> > > --without-sodium \
> > >
> > >by disabling it, dovecot cannot use argon2 as hash
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:51:16AM +, Carmel NY wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I just saw that sodium is explicitely disabled:
> >CONFIGURE_ARGS= --localstatedir=/var \
> >
On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated:
>Hi,
>
>I just saw that sodium is explicitely disabled:
>CONFIGURE_ARGS= --localstatedir=/var \
> --with-statedir=/var/db/dovecot \
> --without-shadow \
> --w
Hi,
I just saw that sodium is explicitely disabled:
CONFIGURE_ARGS= --localstatedir=/var \
--with-statedir=/var/db/dovecot \
--without-shadow \
--without-sodium \
by disabling it, dovecot cannot use argon2 as hash for passwords which
is
I notice that there is no port for the "dovecot-libsodium-plugin";
"https://github.com/LuckyFellow/dovecot-libsodium-plugin/";. I was wondering
if anyone had an interest in creating one?
--
Carmel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.or
ey use the same services internally as supplied externally.
(I could write a short-story…)
Dewayne and The,
The dovecot and pigeonhole ports for 2.3.1 and 0.5.1 are ready to go.
Larry and I have been dogfooding them, and all the bugs I encountered
in 2.3.0 seem to be fixed now.
I’m waiti
lied externally. (I could write a
short-story…)
Dewayne and The,
The dovecot and pigeonhole ports for 2.3.1 and 0.5.1 are ready to go. Larry
and I have been dogfooding them, and all the bugs I encountered in 2.3.0
seem to be fixed now.
I’m waiting for the next quarterly branch (4 day
On 7 Mar, 2018, at 15:18, Dewayne Geraghty
wrote:
Thanks Adam, its very reassuring to know that you'll "dogfood" the update
prior to releasing to FreeBSD ports users. This is one of those high
impact updates that need it - like sendmail, samba, heimdal, squid,
nginx, apache ... ;)
Ki
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:11:05PM +, Matt Smith wrote:
> On Mar 07 09:17, The Doctor wrote:
> >What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
> >
>
> You, constantly asking this list why they haven't upgraded any ports to
> the latest versions but not actually prov
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:15:30AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On 7 Mar, 2018, at 9:17, The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
>
> There are simply a lot of regressions in 2.3. Many of them have been fixed
> upstream, but only th
On 7 Mar, 2018, at 9:17, The Doctor wrote:
What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
There are simply a lot of regressions in 2.3. Many of them have been fixed
upstream, but only the showstoppers made it into 2.3.0.1. The rest of the
fixes will be released with 2.3.1 later this month. 2.2.x
On Mar 07 09:17, The Doctor wrote:
What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
You, constantly asking this list why they haven't upgraded any ports to
the latest versions but not actually providing any patches yourself to
help the volunteers do this more quickly.
--
What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
To
On 2016-11-02 18:03, The Doctor wrote:
I see we are having issues with dovecot 2.226.0 in the FreeBSD world.
What issues?
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Hello everyone.
I see we are having issues with dovecot 2.226.0 in the FreeBSD world.
I did run dovecot-2.2.26.rc1 myself and did not see repeat problem
in POP3 or IMAP issue customers were reporting.
I see this repeat issue in dovecot 2.26.0 either port or compiled similarly.
So the question
> On April 29, 2016 at 5:52 PM olli hauer wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-04-29 16:32, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Do you happen to know who is responsible for Dovecot package in FreeBSD? We
> > would like to keep in touch occasionally and see if
On 2016-04-29 16:32, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Do you happen to know who is responsible for Dovecot package in FreeBSD? We
> would like to keep in touch occasionally and see if we can do co-operation
> with the packages.
>
> Aki Tuomi
> Dovecot Oy
Hi!
> Do you happen to know who is responsible for Dovecot package in
> FreeBSD? We would like to keep in touch occasionally and see if we
> can do co-operation with the packages.
http://www.freshports.org/mail/dovecot2/
lists the maintainer as: ad...@freebsd.org
--
p...
Hi!
Do you happen to know who is responsible for Dovecot package in FreeBSD? We
would like to keep in touch occasionally and see if we can do co-operation with
the packages.
Aki Tuomi
Dovecot Oy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https
olli hauer wrote on 03/23/2016 13:45:
On 2016-03-23 13:22, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi,
the older version of Postfix had options for Cyrus SASL, Dovecot SASL and
Dovecot 2 SASL. I made 3 local meta ports do postfix-sals2 (cyrus library)
postfix-dovecot and postfix-dovecot2. I know mail/postfix
On 2016-03-23 13:22, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hi,
> the older version of Postfix had options for Cyrus SASL, Dovecot SASL and
> Dovecot 2 SASL. I made 3 local meta ports do postfix-sals2 (cyrus library)
> postfix-dovecot and postfix-dovecot2. I know mail/postfix has SASL built in
Hi,
the older version of Postfix had options for Cyrus SASL, Dovecot SASL
and Dovecot 2 SASL. I made 3 local meta ports do postfix-sals2 (cyrus
library) postfix-dovecot and postfix-dovecot2. I know mail/postfix has
SASL built in on Dovecot, but I am not sure if it will work with Dovecot
1.x
On 2014-06-02 15:21, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Can anyone tell me how I can install this port when using Dovecot2?
Running this port now conflicts as it wants to install Dovecot1:
--- cut ---
===> Fetching all distfiles required by dovecot-sieve-1.2+0.1.19_1 for
building
You need the pigeonh
Can anyone tell me how I can install this port when using Dovecot2?
Running this port now conflicts as it wants to install Dovecot1:
--- cut ---
===> Fetching all distfiles required by dovecot-sieve-1.2+0.1.19_1 for
building
===> dovecot-1.2.17_1 conflicts with installed pac
Am Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:14:37 +0200
schrieb olli hauer :
> On 2014-04-28 19:41, olli hauer wrote:
> > On 2014-04-28 19:18, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> >> I am runing 10.0-RELEASE-p1 with dovecot 2.2.10 and LDAP support.
> >>
>
> The issue should be fixed with commit
On 2014-04-28 19:41, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2014-04-28 19:18, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
>> I am runing 10.0-RELEASE-p1 with dovecot 2.2.10 and LDAP support.
>>
The issue should be fixed with commit r352584.
Sorry for breakage.
--
same:
# make configure
...
checking for auth_userokay... no
checking for ldap_init in -lldap... no
configure: error: Can't build with LDAP support: libldap not found
===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to b...@fsn.hu [maintainer] and attach
On 2014-04-28 19:18, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> I am runing 10.0-RELEASE-p1 with dovecot 2.2.10 and LDAP support.
>
>
> The today upgrade to dovecot 2.2.12 fails:
>
> # portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title -D -G dovecot
> ...
> checking for auth_userokay... no
>
I am runing 10.0-RELEASE-p1 with dovecot 2.2.10 and LDAP support.
The today upgrade to dovecot 2.2.12 fails:
# portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title -D -G dovecot
...
checking for auth_userokay... no
checking for ldap_init in -lldap... no
configure: error: Can't build with LDAP su
#x27;m not sure what you want to achieve, I only see that something
wants to pull dovecot2 while you have dovecot-1 installed.
Just checked my /var/db/ports/mail_postfix/options:
OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=DOVECOT
OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=DOVECOT2
So perhaps that would be the problem (having dovecot2 set
you want to achieve, I only see that
something wants to pull dovecot2 while you have dovecot-1 installed.
Just checked my /var/db/ports/mail_postfix/options:
OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=DOVECOT
OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=DOVECOT2
So perhaps that would be the problem (having dovecot2 set instead of
Jos Chrispijn schreef:
Just got an error on Dovecot ports.
As shown I use dovecot 1.x but for some reason v2.x want to install
(Postfix maybe?)
===> dovecot2-2.2.10 conflicts with installed package(s):
dovecot-1.2.17
They install files into the same pl
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Benjamin Podszun
wrote:
> Hey there.
>
> Setting up a machine with ansible, stumbling upon a couple of problems. The
> current issue? Part of my automated setup calls
>
> service dovecot start
>
> and .. that succeeds always, if dovecot
On 02/18/14 16:46, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Just got an error on Dovecot ports.
As shown I use dovecot 1.x but for some reason v2.x want to install
(Postfix maybe?)
===> dovecot2-2.2.10 conflicts with installed package(s):
dovecot-1.2.17
They install files i
Just got an error on Dovecot ports.
As shown I use dovecot 1.x but for some reason v2.x want to install
(Postfix maybe?)
===> dovecot2-2.2.10 conflicts with installed package(s):
dovecot-1.2.17
They install files into the same place.
You may want to s
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:56:18 AM CEST, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Benjamin Podszun <
benjamin.pods...@gmail.com> wrote:
service dovecot start
and .. that succeeds always, if dovecot_enable="YES" is missing (which
totally is an
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Benjamin Podszun <
benjamin.pods...@gmail.com> wrote:
> service dovecot start
>
> and .. that succeeds always, if dovecot_enable="YES" is missing (which
> totally is an error on my part, obviously).
>
> What I expect though i
Hey there.
Setting up a machine with ansible, stumbling upon a couple of problems. The
current issue? Part of my automated setup calls
service dovecot start
and .. that succeeds always, if dovecot_enable="YES" is missing (which
totally is an error on my part, obviously).
What I exp
Hi!
I'm recompiling my ports and it looks like the dovecot-pigeonhole-0.3.3 port
is missing files.
I'm running:
portmaster --no-confirm -adg
.
.
Making all in doc
Making all in man
/bin/sh ./sed.sh . /usr/local/var/run/dovecot /usr/local/etc/dovecot <
./sievec.1.in >
Thanks all for your replies.
I followed up your suggestion and it works perfectly.
Have a nice day,
Jos Chrispijn
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebs
o reinstall?
> >
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Yes, after rebuilding Postfix with the correct options,
> it needs to be deinstalled and reinstalled.
It probably doesn't. It's not a library dependency and POSTFIX_CCARGS
is set the same in the port Makefile for either
On 31-07-2012 14:01, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Thomas Steen Rasmussen:
>> Neither - you go to /usr/ports/mail/postfix and do make config,
>> uncheck dovecot1 and check dovecot2 option, and rebuild Postfix. Best
>> regards, Thomas Steen Rasmussen ps. To fix this with my preferred
>> t
On 31-07-2012 13:35, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
>
> [1:24pm] > pkgdb -F
> ---> Checking the package registry database
> Stale dependency: postfix-2.9.3,1 -> dovecot-1.2.17 (mail/dovecot):
>
> Currently installed:
> dovecot-2.1.8 Secure and compact IMAP and POP3 s
Op di 31 jul 2012 13:35:06 schreef Jos Chrispijn:
> [1:24pm] > pkgdb -F
> ---> Checking the package registry database
> Stale dependency: postfix-2.9.3,1 -> dovecot-1.2.17 (mail/dovecot):
>
> Currently installed:
> dovecot-2.1.8 Secure and compact IMAP and POP
[1:24pm] > pkgdb -F
---> Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: postfix-2.9.3,1 -> dovecot-1.2.17 (mail/dovecot):
Currently installed:
dovecot-2.1.8 Secure and compact IMAP and POP3 servers
postfix-2.9.3,1 A secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail
Sho
ffering "MECH
>>>> LOGIN plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix
>>>> setting.
>>>
>>> His dovecot configuration also appears to be offering the PLAIN
>>> plaintext auth mechanism; not just LOGIN.
>>
>>
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:35:58 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >> From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH
> >> LOGIN plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix
&g
On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH LOGIN
>> plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix setting.
>
> His dovecot configuration also appears to be offering the
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 15:18:41 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH LOGIN
>plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix setting.
His dovecot configuration also appears to be offering the PLAIN
pla
Hi--
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Petr Holub wrote:
> smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext
> smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
>From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH LOGIN
>plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix setting.
[ I agree with Jerry that this question belongs on postfix-users,
but I hope my response is helpful ]
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 23:38:58 +0200, Petr Holub wrote:
> I'm using mail/postfix with WITH_DOVECOT2=yes and mail/dovecot2 with MySQL
> backend for users from FreeBSD ports:
>
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:38:58 +0200
Petr Holub articulated:
> Any ideas where could be the problem?
This question really belongs on either the Postfix or Dovecot forums. I
would suggest starting with the Postfix one and proceeding from there.
Start with the documentation located here:
h
Hi,
I'm using mail/postfix with WITH_DOVECOT2=yes and mail/dovecot2 with MySQL
backend for users from FreeBSD ports:
dovecot-2.0.12
postfix-2.8.4,1
I'm unable to get SMTP authentication working using Dovecot SASL with
postfix/main.cf:
...
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
smtpd
RW:
In practice managesieve support isn't widespread enough for it to be a
sole mean of updating scripts, so it's common to provide a webpage for
the purpose, which may use managesieve as a standard interface. Going
through managesieve prevents a script with syntax errors overwriting a
working
Synopsis: mail/dovecot: Users of Alpha platform should stay with Dovecot 1.1.16
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: eadler
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 22 22:22:57 EST 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Works fine on all supported systems. Good bye to alpha PRs
http://www.freebsd.
The following reply was made to PR ports/148392; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Craig Butler
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, pac...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/148392: mail/dovecot: Users of Alpha platform should
stay with Dovecot 1.1.16
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 02:15:17 +
Hi Folks
The following reply was made to PR ports/148392; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Craig Butler
To: bug-followup
Cc:
Subject: ports/148392: [mail/dovecot] Users of Alpha platform should stay
with Dovecot 1.1.16
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:59:36 +
I'll build and test on sparc
Old Synopsis: Users of Alpha platform should stay with Dovecot 1.1.16
New Synopsis: [mail/dovecot] Users of Alpha platform should stay with Dovecot
1.1.16
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: eadler
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 22 19:33:20 EST 2011
State-Changed-
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:42:20 +0100
Niclas Zeising wrote:
> As far as I can tell, dovecot-managesieve is the server part of sieve.
> You can have it running to be able to use a sieve client to define
> your sieve programs, instead of having to log on to the mail server
> and edit a
ised in this list to use Dovecot Sieve.
>
> /usr/ports/mail/dovecot-sieve
> /usr/ports/mail/dovecot-sieve/Makefile
> /usr/ports/mail/dovecot-sieve/distinfo
> /usr/ports/mail/dovecot-sieve/files
> /usr/ports/mail/dovecot-sieve/files/pkg-message.in
> /usr/ports/mail/dovecot-sieve/pk
I want to define mail filters for incoming mail in order to have them in
the right folders once I check my mail with my mobile phone (when not
having my IMAP client incl. rules online). Running with Dovecont
already, I have been advised in this list to use Dovecot Sieve.
/usr/ports/mail
Am 28.12.2010 um 13:57 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
> Just a quick warning since I just spent an hour figuring out why my mail
> server broke: with the upgrade to mysql-client-5.5.8, postfix and dovecot
> stop working.
It appears that the lastest mysql-client-5.5.8_2, postfix and do
Just a quick warning since I just spent an hour figuring out why my mail server
broke: with the upgrade to mysql-client-5.5.8, postfix and dovecot stop working.
This is:
FreeBSD gilb.zs64.net 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #32: Mon Nov 29
23:10:07 UTC 2010 r...@lokschuppen.zs64.net
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:52:37 -0500
Sahil Tandon articulated:
> I understand that several people have migrated from mail/dovecot ->
> mail/dovecot2, and use Dovecot SASL with Postfix. I am thinking of
> committing a trivial patch[1] to the Postfix ports that should allow
> SAS
I understand that several people have migrated from mail/dovecot ->
mail/dovecot2, and use Dovecot SASL with Postfix. I am thinking of
committing a trivial patch[1] to the Postfix ports that should allow
SASL configuration with either Dovecot version.
Are there any objections or suggestions
Rick ha scritto:
I was wondering why vpopmail support is disabled in this port.
I think the reason was that the PR was submitted for 2.0.3 release, that
removed vpopmail support. It's been readded in 2.0.4, so you are right,
the port options should be updated.
--
Alex Dupre
Hi,
I was wondering why vpopmail support is disabled in this port. I just
tested it on 8-STABLE. It compiles and runs just fine, although I did
have to comment out the extra arguments in dovecot's example
configuration file (auth-vpopmail.conf.ext) because I'm using neither
Maildir++ nor quotas:
On 2010-10-18 9:47 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
V2 of dovecot has had the following releases (to recap)
2.0.0 2010-08-16
2.0.1 2010-08-24
2.0.2 2010-09-08
2.0.3 2010-09-17
2.0.4 2010-09-26
2.0.5 2010-10-01
2.0.6 2010-10-25
2.0.7 2010-11-12
FreeBSD added dovecot2 to the ports recently (finally
The following reply was made to PR alpha/148392; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
pac...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: alpha/148392: Users of Alpha platform should stay with Dovecot
1.1.16
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:37:39 -0400
Bah, accidentally lost
Synopsis: Users of Alpha platform should stay with Dovecot 1.1.16
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-alpha->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: jhb
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Nov 3 13:33:02 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148
FYI for all concerned
On 10/18/2010 10:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:47 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
So, my question is, respectfully, is dovecot V2.0.5 stable enough
for prime-time on a busy ISP mail server?
It's getting better :) I'll make 2.0.6 release
here is a port for dovecot 2 in the works
>> already or if I could be any assistance in getting it up and >running?
>>
>>
>> Check out these URL's
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/150789
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:52:51AM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> >I was just wondering if there is a port for dovecot 2 in the works
> already or if I could be any assistance in getting it up and >running?
>
>
> Check out these URL's
>
> http://www.freeb
>Hi
>I was just wondering if there is a port for dovecot 2 in the works
already or if I could be any assistance in getting it up and >running?
Check out these URL's
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/150789
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/1507
On 09/25/2010 07:37, Garrett Heaver wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was just wondering if there is a port for dovecot 2 in the works already or
> if I could be any assistance in getting it up and running?
>
> Many Thanks!
> Garrett Heaver___
Hi
I was just wondering if there is a port for dovecot 2 in the works already or
if I could be any assistance in getting it up and running?
Many Thanks!
Garrett Heaver___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:01:35AM -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> On 8/24/2010 4:48 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
> >
> >I submitted ports/149866 a few days ago to update Dovecot to 1.2.13.
> >Still awaiting maintainer approval.
> >
> >I'll submit another PR to u
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 11:01:35 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> On 8/24/2010 4:48 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
> >
> >I submitted ports/149866 a few days ago to update Dovecot to 1.2.13.
> >Still awaiting maintainer approval.
> >
> >I'll submit another PR to update Dove
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:01:35 -0700
Jim Pazarena articulated:
> On 8/24/2010 4:48 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
> >
> > I submitted ports/149866 a few days ago to update Dovecot to 1.2.13.
> > Still awaiting maintainer approval.
> >
> > I'll submit another PR to u
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
