On 4/30/13 6:38 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152 we are
looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so that they
fit where the interpreters is on FreeBSD.
We also want to get rid of /usr/bin/perl
h
On 5/2/13 10:22 AM, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
W dniu 2013-05-01 21:18, Oliver Heesakkers pisze:
Op di 30 apr 2013 12:38:21 schreef Baptiste Daroussin:
In there you wrote a patch using /usr/bin/env. Why not stick with that? I'm
quite fond of this technique as it's clean and portable.
Portabi
On 2 May 2013 21:00, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski
> wrote:
>> W dniu 2013-05-02 20:29, Oliver Heesakkers pisze:
>>
>>> Op do 02 mei 2013 16:22:41 schreef Łukasz Wąsikowski:
>>
/usr/bin/env is not good in all the situation. Look at
www.free
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
> W dniu 2013-05-02 20:29, Oliver Heesakkers pisze:
>
>> Op do 02 mei 2013 16:22:41 schreef Łukasz Wąsikowski:
>
>>> /usr/bin/env is not good in all the situation. Look at
>>> www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177481 - /usr/bin/env is not
W dniu 2013-05-02 20:29, Oliver Heesakkers pisze:
> Op do 02 mei 2013 16:22:41 schreef Łukasz Wąsikowski:
>> /usr/bin/env is not good in all the situation. Look at
>> www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177481 - /usr/bin/env is not working
>> when using 'service' to start daemons. We should chang
Op do 02 mei 2013 16:22:41 schreef Łukasz Wąsikowski:
> W dniu 2013-05-01 21:18, Oliver Heesakkers pisze:
> > Op di 30 apr 2013 12:38:21 schreef Baptiste Daroussin:
> >> For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152
> >> we
> >> are looking for a framework/helpers to help
W dniu 2013-05-01 21:18, Oliver Heesakkers pisze:
> Op di 30 apr 2013 12:38:21 schreef Baptiste Daroussin:
>> For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152 we
>> are looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so
>> that they fit where the interprete
On 1 May 2013 20:18, "Oliver Heesakkers" wrote:
>
> Op di 30 apr 2013 12:38:21 schreef Baptiste Daroussin:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152we
> > are looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so
> > that they fit whe
Op di 30 apr 2013 12:38:21 schreef Baptiste Daroussin:
> Hi all,
>
> For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152 we
> are looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so
> that they fit where the interpreters is on FreeBSD.
>
(...)
In there you wro
On 30 April 2013 13:52, Chris Rees wrote:
> This proposes running each regex over each file in turn.
"or some variant thereof" - if that is really a big deal the regex
could be modified to do all of them at once.
We could even run the regex on just the first line.
--
Eitan Adler
_
On 30 Apr 2013 18:46, "Eitan Adler" wrote:
>
> On 30 April 2013 13:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:38:03PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> On 30 April 2013 13:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> > All of this will be damn slow operations, we want to keep this as
fast a
On 30 April 2013 13:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:38:03PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 30 April 2013 13:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> > All of this will be damn slow operations, we want to keep this as fast as
>> > possible, even if per-ports it seems quite fast
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:38:03PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 13:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > All of this will be damn slow operations, we want to keep this as fast as
> > possible, even if per-ports it seems quite fast, when you are about the
> > build
> > the whole ports
On 30 April 2013 13:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> All of this will be damn slow operations, we want to keep this as fast as
> possible, even if per-ports it seems quite fast, when you are about the build
> the whole ports tree few seconds there and there will become hours
Yes, that is why I end
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:31:47PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 06:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > So far what has been proposed already is:
> > - replace ${lang}_FILES by FIX_${lang}
> > - nuke SHEBANG_LANG in favor of USES= shebangfix:perl:python
> > - nuke SHEBANG_LANG in f
On 30 April 2013 06:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> So far what has been proposed already is:
> - replace ${lang}_FILES by FIX_${lang}
> - nuke SHEBANG_LANG in favor of USES= shebangfix:perl:python
> - nuke SHEBANG_LANG in favor of USES= shebangfix:"perl python"
> - nuke SHEBANG_LANG in favor of
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:59:47PM +0200, Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
> * Baptiste Daroussin [2013-04-30]:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152 we
> > are
> > looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so that
> > they
> >
* Baptiste Daroussin [2013-04-30]:
> Hi all,
>
> For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152 we are
> looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so that they
> fit where the interpreters is on FreeBSD.
>
> We also want to get rid of /usr/bin/perl
Hi all,
For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152 we are
looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so that they
fit where the interpreters is on FreeBSD.
We also want to get rid of /usr/bin/perl
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/
19 matches
Mail list logo
