W dniu 2013-05-01 21:18, Oliver Heesakkers pisze: > Op di 30 apr 2013 12:38:21 schreef Baptiste Daroussin:
>> For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152 we >> are looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so >> that they fit where the interpreters is on FreeBSD. >> > (...) > > In there you wrote a patch using /usr/bin/env. Why not stick with that? I'm > quite fond of this technique as it's clean and portable. > > Portability might not be that important when working on a fix for ports > alone, > but still makes sense to me. /usr/bin/env is not good in all the situation. Look at www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177481 - /usr/bin/env is not working when using 'service' to start daemons. We should change PATH used by 'service' to include /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin or stop using /usr/bin/env to start rc.d scripts. -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
