Michel Talon wrote on 04.09.2011 11:29:
Ruslan wrote:
Hi, i maintain port (sysutils/rdup) that is failing with clang:
I have looked at the problem, it is indeed in rdup source. If you look
at rdup git history for rdup-tr.c you will see
remove rdup_entry_c from the code, totally unnee
Ivan Klymenko wrote on 04.09.2011 11:12:
В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:42:07 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
Roman Divacky wrote on 25.07.2011 19:59:
Hi!
Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The
results can be seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-erro
Matthias Andree wrote:
> > I agree, but I can think of another valid exception. System with
> > Hamming correction on the memory, gets a single bit (correctable)
> > error. Need to rewrite the memory contents to reset all the parity
> > bits!
> That's a matter of the EDAC stuff, not the business o
> I agree, but I can think of another valid exception. System with
> Hamming correction on the memory, gets a single bit (correctable)
> error. Need to rewrite the memory contents to reset all the parity
> bits!
That's a matter of the EDAC stuff, not the business of applications.
_
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:22:35 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 04.09.2011 10:45, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> > В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:34:33 +0200
> > Matthias Andree пишет:
> >
> >> Am 04.09.2011 09:12, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> >>
> >>> Maybe this will help:
> >>> *rdup_entry = *rdup_entry;
> >>
>
Am 04.09.2011 10:48, schrieb Mark Linimon:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:09:05AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> Can you advise which value of __FreeBSD_version to use? The official
>> list at
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html
>> does n
Am 04.09.2011 10:45, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:34:33 +0200
> Matthias Andree пишет:
>
>> Am 04.09.2011 09:12, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
>>
>>> Maybe this will help:
>>> *rdup_entry = *rdup_entry;
>>
>> This is just guessing and probably triggers the same warning unless
>> it's v
В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:34:33 +0200
Matthias Andree пишет:
> Am 04.09.2011 09:12, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
>
> > Maybe this will help:
> > *rdup_entry = *rdup_entry;
>
> This is just guessing and probably triggers the same warning unless
> it's volatile.
>
> Have the original author look at it.
T
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:09:05AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Can you advise which value of __FreeBSD_version to use? The official
> list at
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html
> does not have a reference from what I can see.
There is
Am 04.09.2011 08:42, schrieb Ruslan Mahmatkhanov:
> Roman Divacky wrote on 25.07.2011 19:59:
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The
>> results can be
>> seen here:
>>
>>
>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>>
Am 04.09.2011 09:12, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> Maybe this will help:
> *rdup_entry = *rdup_entry;
This is just guessing and probably triggers the same warning unless it's
volatile.
Have the original author look at it.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
Am 04.09.2011 05:09, schrieb Gerald Pfeifer:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Namely: if a port sets USE_GCC=4.2+ (for instance, sysutils/busybox does
>> that), the Pointyhat build does not install GCC. I think the bug is in
>> ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk which is unaware that there are ne
В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:42:07 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
> Roman Divacky wrote on 25.07.2011 19:59:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The
> > results can be seen here:
> >
> >
> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.2
Ruslan wrote:
> Hi, i maintain port (sysutils/rdup) that is failing with clang:
I have looked at the problem, it is indeed in rdup source. If you look
at rdup git history for rdup-tr.c you will see
remove rdup_entry_c from the code, totally unneeded
in this modification, the line
rdup
Roman Divacky wrote on 25.07.2011 19:59:
Hi!
Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can
be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
Since the last run we've managed to fix the biggest offenders but that
un
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Namely: if a port sets USE_GCC=4.2+ (for instance, sysutils/busybox does
> that), the Pointyhat build does not install GCC. I think the bug is in
> ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk which is unaware that there are newer clang-based
> 9-CURRENT systems without gcc.
>
Am 25.07.2011 17:59, schrieb Roman Divacky:
> Hi!
>
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
>
> Since the last run we've managed to fix
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:06 PM, George Liaskos wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I added some jquery for sorting / searching at the latest clang exp run.
> http://cybertron.gr/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/index.html
>
> I hope you 'll find it useful.
The table should be sortable already, j
Hi--
On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
> qt4-webkit seems to trigger a clang bug, but the description for clang
> bug only says "See (TBA) for further information". Is there anything we
> (
Roman Divacky writes:
> Hi!
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
qt4-webkit seems to trigger a clang bug, but the description for clang
bug only say
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
>
> Since the last run we've managed to fix the
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:59:20PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
It would be good to also
Hi!
Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can
be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
Since the last run we've managed to fix the biggest offenders but that
uncovered others that need fixing. Th
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Koop Mast wrote:
> I need to review the patches mentioned on the end of that wiki page. But I
> have currently a couple of deadlines I need to do work for, so that takes
> priority atm. If I find anything that is still needed, I will let the
> responsible people no
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 08:19:05AM +, b. f. wrote:
> Is there a new link for the new results? Or did you use the link above?
same link.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubsc
On 30-6-2011 14:42, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the ports
you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them.
as of today, qt 4 builds successfully with clang :)
A small intro
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the ports
> you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them.
as of today, qt 4 builds successfully with clang :)
> A small introduction into
> the Clang+Ports can be r
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:19 AM, b. f. wrote:
> Mark Linimon wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:21:26PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> > A permanent URL to this run is:
>> >
>> >
>> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110616185105/
>> >
>> > That will stick aro
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:21:26PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > A permanent URL to this run is:
> >
> >
> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110616185105/
> >
> > That will stick around even if we use amd64-9-exp for something else.
>
> I
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:21:26PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> A permanent URL to this run is:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110616185105/
>
> That will stick around even if we use amd64-9-exp for something else.
I have updated the errorlog-classifi
Am 21.06.2011 12:43, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
> Just be aware that stable clang has some issue with the stable binutils,
> to fix this make sure to use binutils from ports.
>
> To be able to test on stable:
> export CC=clang
> export CXX=clang++
> PATH=/usr/local/bin:${PATH} make -C myport
> t
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:18 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 21.06.2011 12:29, schrieb Alex Dupre:
Matthias Andree ha scritto:
I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test
them?
Do something similar to this:
Thanks for the instructions, but currently I haven't a -current
Am 21.06.2011 12:29, schrieb Alex Dupre:
> Matthias Andree ha scritto:
>>> I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test them?
>>
>> Do something similar to this:
>
> Thanks for the instructions, but currently I haven't a -current ready
> for testing, this is the reason of my ques
Matthias Andree ha scritto:
I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test them?
Do something similar to this:
Thanks for the instructions, but currently I haven't a -current ready
for testing, this is the reason of my question :-)
--
Alex Dupre
Am 21.06.2011 12:15, schrieb Alex Dupre:
> Roman Divacky ha scritto:
>> It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of
>> the ports
>> you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them.
>
> I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test them?
>
Do somethin
Roman Divacky ha scritto:
It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the ports
you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them.
I have patches for my ports, can I send them to anyone to test them?
--
Alex Dupre
___
freeb
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Mark Linimon (from Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:21:26
> -0500):
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:37:53PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
>>>
>>> Flz@ just ran an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can
>>> be
>>> seen here:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:37:53 +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
Hi!
Flz@ just run an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
can be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. not respecting CC
setting
Quoting Mark Linimon (from Mon, 20 Jun 2011
18:21:26 -0500):
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:37:53PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
Flz@ just ran an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
A permanent URL
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:37:53PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Flz@ just ran an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
> seen here:
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
A permanent URL to this run is:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/
Pan Tsu writes:
> Roman Divacky writes:
>
>> Flz@ just run an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
>> seen here:
>>
>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
>>
>> A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. not respecting CC setting,
>> et
On 06/20/2011 02:44 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 06/20/2011 02:28 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
top_button_cross() probably should be declared as returning void. What's
presumably happening is that it gets a default return type
Roman Divacky writes:
> Flz@ just run an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
> seen here:
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
>
> A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. not respecting CC setting,
> etc.)
> and prevent a lot of o
On 06/20/2011 02:28 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
top_button_cross() probably should be declared as returning void. What's
presumably happening is that it gets a default return type of int since it
doesn't otherwise specify a return type
On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> top_button_cross() probably should be declared as returning void. What's
>> presumably happening is that it gets a default return type of int since it
>> doesn't otherwise specify a return type, and then fails to have an explicit
On 06/20/2011 12:59 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 20, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
What I would like is a primer on how to suppress all the warnings and errors
created by K&R code.
OK:
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#cl_diagnostics
Yes, I did see that.
On Jun 20, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> What I would like is a primer on how to suppress all the warnings and errors
> created by K&R code.
OK:
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#cl_diagnostics
Of course, you can only suppress warnings; you cannot suppress act
On 06/20/2011 11:22 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2011-06-20 17:37, Roman Divacky wrote:
Hi!
Flz@ just run an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
A lot of these failures are trivial to fix
Hi, Roman. Can you specify what environment and which make options
where used? I'm somewhat confused because of log [1]: the Makefile
basically does the compiling this way:
${MAKE} PROG=lemon NOMAN=1 NO_MAN=1 \
CFLAGS="-g ${CFLAGS}" \
-f /usr/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk
Since bsd.pro
On 2011-06-20 17:37, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Flz@ just run an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
> seen here:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
>
>
> A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. not respecting CC sett
Hi!
Flz@ just run an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-exp-latest/
A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. not respecting CC setting, etc.)
and prevent a lot of other ports from building.
It w
51 matches
Mail list logo
