> chr...@ultimatedns.net wrote:
>
>>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I
>>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well?
>>
>> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license,
>> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate.
>
> So
> Update: the port is pretty much ready for submission. I decided to go with
> misc/fortune-mod-offensive, similar to the other ones (one of which is
> unmaintained so I'll try to stagify and adopt that one while I'm at it).
> The COMMENT became
>The offensive fortunes from FreeBSD 9 base, remo
