needed, don't hesitate. Have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by man."
-- Gen. Geor
tps://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
+1 on packages, *much* faster & same end result if you have no special
compi
.02, no more, no less.
[wam@kabini1, ~, 7:07:35am] 368 % uname -a
FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p33 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p33 #0: Wed
Jan 13 17:55:39 UTC 2016
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GE
I can see. Is that indeed considered a
specification ? If so, it would seem to satisfy the LTS desire
implicitly. TIA & have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the fine
On 04/14/16 01:54, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 14/04/2016 05:38, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
All seems OK w/ the system headers (I know, shocking ), the required files
defining a '__uintptr_t' are in fact unconditionally included, so it must be
something else (bad defines som
On 04/13/16 02:51, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:02 AM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
On 04/12/16 21:05, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:32:21PM -0453, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
A bit of poking around yields a 'typedef __uintptr_t uint
orts
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Interesting. I am seeing (almost) the same error in another thread
('porting' open64 compiler), same issue, some problem
On 04/12/16 21:05, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:32:21PM -0453, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
A bit of poking around yields a 'typedef __uintptr_t uintptr_t;'
statement as line 78 of /usr/include/sys/_stdint.h, where __uintptr_t
isn't defined anywhere
On 04/11/16 08:58, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 04/10/16 18:57, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what
seems to
be
On 04/10/16 18:57, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compi
On 04/11/16 07:04, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 11.04.2016 03:32, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 04/10/16 20:22, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Or set the (g)make variable 'MAKE' to gmake & let it propogate
What you are doing
On 04/10/16 20:22, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Or set the (g)make variable 'MAKE' to gmake & let it propogate
What you are doing is, in effect, creating a port. If you create a
real port, there are numerous tools to deal with
On 04/10/16 19:05, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ wha
On 04/10/16 19:09, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:50 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ wha
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for
different architectures, see attached ori
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for
different architectures, see attached ori
aemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[root@devbox, obj, 5:06:26pm] 938 % which make
/usr/bin/make
[root@devbox, obj, 5:06:31pm] 939 %
Again, I am stumped for now, any help appreciated. TIA * have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
-
rc-base/port management tools they
wanted. I definitely agree that a well integrated ability to possibly
mix locally compiled stuff w/ repo-binaries is quite desirable in many
scenarios & a nice advantage for FreeBSD. $0.02 fro
ement is
fragmented. Until that is resolved, a lot of time and effort will be
wasted treating the symptoms.
Royce
Preach it *LOUD*, brother :-) (fragmented package management)
For my , that is about *all* RH & Debian have going for them, but
yum/RPM et al cover up a multitude of o
any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
*Huzzah* I hereby 2nd that motion (from the cheap seats) :-)
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the fi
On 02/08/16 23:51, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
mailto:w...@hiwaay.net>> wrote:
On 02/08/16 15:52, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:36:58 -0553.75, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
My torrc
On 02/08/16 15:52, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:36:58 -0553.75, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
My torrc
files seems to indicate logging to /usr/local/var/log/tor, but no such
file or directory.
Create this directory subtree and an empty log file. Then check
if it will actually be
root@kabini1, /etc, 3:36:08pm] 468 %
tor-0.2.7.6_1 (upgraded last week), torsocks-2.1.0 (didn't upgrade)
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
On 02/04/16 17:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 02/04/16 15:42, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
( rxvt -sl 5000 -fn
-*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & )
[wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:43am] 303 % rxvt: No match.
Tr
On 02/04/16 15:42, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
( rxvt -sl 5000 -fn
-*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & )
[wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:43am] 303 % rxvt: No match.
Try escaping the asterisks in the font string.
HTH,
Fonz
/ XFCE ? Any other
issues/gotchas ? Pilot error ? Any clues appreciated, any info needed
just ask. TIA & have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the fines
On 02/04/16 02:23, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 22:03, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
*Eek* (RTFM), I use pkg by default, ports only when necessary
(graphite for gcc5, flash for firefox/opera, etc.), so I am not as
familiar w/ ports ai I should be :-/
If you need
On 02/03/16 10:40, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III
mailto:w...@hiwaay.net>>wrote:
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make show
On 02/03/16 09:45, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:59, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
make showconfig shows
y LAN time coincide w/
my wall clocks, which are about 6 min. fast (375 sec. actually), keeps
me punctual :-)
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implem
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
make showconfig shows the configuration at your *local* portstree. It
does not affect or display the settings of pkg.
To
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
make showconfig shows the configuration at your *local* portstree. It
does not affect or display the settings of pkg.
To
On 02/03/16 08:40, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 02/03/16 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I just did a full 'pkg upgrade' on my FBSD 9.3R box, which installed the
newest GCC5. I also updated ports. When I used the pkg-provided GCC5, it
doesn't have graphite support enab
, so I thought
I was ready to go. Not a huge issue, but recompiling the compiler shoots
about an hour on my box, would be sweet to avoid that. TIA for any clues
& have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
On 09/23/14 22:46, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 09/22/14 23:50, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:19 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
On 09/22/14 16:38, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 09/21/14 16:52, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 09/21/14 18:12, Robert_Burmeister wrote
35 matches
Mail list logo
