Re: No update for a day on ports?

2021-04-02 Thread Steve Wills
choice is yours. Cheers, Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: bogus warning from pkg

2021-02-15 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:44:46PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > > Do you use: > > https://www.freshports.org/ports-mgmt/port-maintenance-tools/ > First port installed on any system is pkg. Second port installed is portmaster. Everything after that is installed with portmas

Re: bogus warning from pkg

2021-02-15 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:18:13PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote on > Tue Feb 16 02:14:06 UTC 2021 : > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 05:10:54PM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > > wrote: >

Re: bogus warning from pkg

2021-02-15 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 05:10:54PM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote on > Mon Feb 15 20:39:19 UTC 2021 : > > > Step 1). Install FreeBSD 13.0 on empty disk. > > Step 2). Install git from ports and grab FreeB

Re: bogus warning from pkg

2021-02-15 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:56:51PM +, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:39:13 -0800 > Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > BTW, there is no documentation as what 'pkg bootstrap -f' > > does. In particular, the -f option is no descr

Re: bogus warning from pkg

2021-02-15 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:01:47PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:10 AM Steve Kargl < > s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > I have a system installed from late January FreeBSD-current > > sources and at that point an up-to-date por

bogus warning from pkg

2021-02-15 Thread Steve Kargl
ing: Major OS version upgrade detected. Running \ "pkg bootstrap -f" recommended Short of running the bootstrap command, how do I get rid of these messages, which are clearly bogus. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili

Re: Removing sysutils/polkit dependency from sysutils/libudisks?

2021-01-18 Thread Steve Wills
hich look ready to commit aren't merged[3]. * The default policy gives everyone in wheel root access. So, to me, the features it provides don't seem worth it. I have removed it from my local system with some local patches and it seems to work fine. I haven't missed it at all. An

Re: Removing sysutils/polkit dependency from sysutils/libudisks?

2021-01-16 Thread Steve Wills
, I'm still very much of the opinion that the less polkit is used the better. Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-port

Re: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 ignored?

2020-12-05 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 01:18:34AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote on: > > > > Well, I guess that pretty much kills LLVM_DEFAULT for any > > modern hardware (even a 8 year old laptop) that uses drm > > unless a user wan

Re: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 ignored?

2020-12-04 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:41:41PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > Steve Kargl writes: > > > It takes a long time to compile on my laptop. I have > > > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 > > Why do you need to redefine current default? Simply changed /etc/make.conf on my lap

DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 ignored?

2020-12-04 Thread Steve Kargl
dependencies? Is something broken in the ports *.mk files? -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Github redirects for go based ports seems to be not working as expected

2020-10-22 Thread Steve Wills
. I'd love to be wrong tho. Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[PATCH] math/openlibm is broken on i386

2020-09-12 Thread Steve Kargl
BROKEN_mips64= fails to compile: No rule to make target mips64/Make.files -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Fwd: ports Makefile for gitlab subdirs

2020-09-07 Thread Steve Wills
gets extracted: kicad-bd23d003d219cb513b01feb4d9763879c9248f53-bd23d003d219cb513b01feb4d9763879c9248f53/ Try adding this: WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME}-${GL_COMMIT}-${GL_COMMIT} Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-10 Thread Steve Wills
Hi, On 8/10/20 9:28 AM, Lars Engels wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:43:20PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: I'm probably fine with this and I think that all of the (now) supported methods have pros and cons. To leverage the UX flaws of git and svn(lite) compared to portsnap having a wrapper s

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-07 Thread Steve Wills
Hi, On 8/7/20 6:19 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:24:00 -0400 Steve Wills wrote: Hi, [snip] 2. Use svnlite to checkout a ports tree. (There will be git -> svn replication. Will this be a long-term option? I don't know yet exactly how long the git to svn m

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-06 Thread Steve Wills
rts tree either from: https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/ports/ports/ or cgit. Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-05 Thread Steve Wills
necessarily, as 11.x and 12.x will have it of course, but it should definitely handle portsnap not being present on the system in any case, since it can be disabled via WITHOUT_PORTSNAP (even on 11.x and 12.x). Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Git migration - was Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-05 Thread Steve Wills
different thread, I'm trying to monitor the portsnap related thread for issues related to that. Thanks, Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

[HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-04 Thread Steve Wills
We welcome any constructive feedback. All input would be heard, and if the plans need to be amended, we will come back to you with the amended plan in a couple of weeks. This process will take some time and hopefully won't be too disruptive to anyone's usual workflow. Steve (

Re: FreeBSD Port: purple-discord-g20200802

2020-08-03 Thread Steve Wills
d/3226. gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:138: discord16.png] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/net-im/purple-discord/work/purple-discord-8fd7ceb' *** Error code 2 Sorry, no idea. Never seen those errors and can't reproduce. Steve __

Re: Why lang/gcc9 depends native-binutils ?

2020-07-20 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:33:13AM +0900, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote: > > lang/gcc9 depends devel/binutils with FLAVOR=native, so gcc9 > compilation stopped at devel/binutils. Why lang/gcc9 depends > native-binutils ? > Just a guess.

Re: Json-c, bind, and updating

2020-06-09 Thread Steve Kargl
uc.so.67 libevent-2.1.so.6 libevent-2.1.so.7 libncurses.so.8 libncurses.so.9 libncursesw.so.8 libncursesw.so.9 because it seems like everything (indirectly) depends on libncurses change and the icu port. Eventually, portmaster and I catch up and libmap.conf entries are r

Re: current: cd /lib ; ln -s libncurses.so.9 libncurses.so.8 xterm & ffox

2020-04-02 Thread Steve Kargl
cat /etc/libmap.conf ... libncurses.so.8 libncurses.so.9 libncursesw.so.8 libncursesw.so.9 HTH -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: openblas-0.3.7_1,1 error install

2020-01-31 Thread Steve Wills
tion is off. Are you experiencing an issue besides the complaint from portmaster? The libopenblas.so symlink is there, so I think there shouldn't be any issues using the lib. Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/

Re: FreeBSD Port: openblas-0.3.7_1,1 error install

2020-01-31 Thread Steve Wills
root wheel29 Jan 31 10:45 /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.a -> libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel30 Jan 31 10:45 /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.so -> libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.so Are you seeing any other issues besides the complaint from portmaster?

Re: FreeBSD Port: openblas-0.3.7_1,1 error install

2020-01-31 Thread Steve Wills
Hi, On 1/31/20 11:42 AM, ajtiM wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:01:42 -0500 Steve Wills wrote: Hi, On 1/30/20 9:25 PM, Alex V. Petrov wrote: ===> Installing for openblas-0.3.7_1,1 ===> Checking if openblas is already installed ===> Registering installation for openblas-0.3.

Re: FreeBSD Port: openblas-0.3.7_1,1 error install

2020-01-31 Thread Steve Wills
eebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243739 Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: mail/junkfilter is several broken

2020-01-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:22:20PM +0100, Stefan Eßer wrote: > Am 01.01.20 um 22:04 schrieb Steve Kargl: > > For users of mail/junkfilter, it now will filter all emails claiming > > a "Bad Date line". The following patch seems to fix the problem for > > the next de

mail/junkfilter is several broken

2020-01-01 Thread Steve Kargl
)[0-9](:(0?|[1-5])[0-9])?$JFWS\ (([+-][0-1][0-4]([03]0|45))|("?\(?(UT|GMT|EST|EDT|CST|CDT|MST|MDT|PST|PDT|[A-I]|[K-Z])\)?"?))? { JFMATCH="$JFSEC: Bad Date line" INCLUDERC=$JFDIR/junkfilter.match } Suggest either installing the patch or marking

Re: XXX needs Python 3.4 at least, but 2.7 was specified

2019-12-25 Thread Steve Kargl
et a 2-line patch to the python committed, and AFAICT, the commit was done by portmgr instead python@. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2019-December/117300.html https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2019-December/23569

Re: python support appears broken in the ports trree

2019-12-10 Thread Steve Kargl
ty no longer available? Or? > Empirical evidence suggests that answer is "yes". -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: python36 is still broken.

2019-12-07 Thread Steve Kargl
require 2.7? I'll simply be direct. It is a 2-line patch that renames a static function in a single file. Why is so difficult for python@ and/or ports@ to include the patch for the various python ports. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org m

Re: python36 is still broken.

2019-12-06 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:49:46PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:41 AM Steve Kargl > wrote: > > > > This has been reported for many years and there are open bug reports. > > Any chance that the this will be fixed. > > > &g

python36 is still broken.

2019-12-06 Thread Steve Kargl
inpi(x); +return 0.0/a_really_bad_idea_sinpi(x); } else { errno = ERANGE; -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any m

Re: Checking you the maintainer of a port?

2019-11-27 Thread Steve Kargl
pkg-info or grep -i maintainer /path/to/port/Makefile -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Using a different linker in a CMake project

2019-09-26 Thread Steve Kargl
/bin/ld > But I sure that that would not make it in the porst tree. > % cat Makefile PATH = /usr/bin:/bin .unexport-env .export PATH all: @echo ${PATH} which ld % which ld /usr/local/bin/ld % make /usr/bin:/bin which ld /usr/bin/ld HTH -- Steve _

Re: How to best check a configuration of another port/package?

2019-06-13 Thread Steve Wills
does that impact binutils? The approach I would have taken would have been to make the static option in binutils also install an empty file in DATADIR and have GCC check that file. Maybe that isn't ideal. Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mai

gnupod - can't use hash as reference.

2019-04-29 Thread Steve Roome
Here's patches to fix gnupod, as attachments, as they should have been. Sorry about that, Steve --- /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/GNUpod/XMLhelper.pm.orig 2019-04-29 20:45:40.054385000 +0100 +++ /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/GNUpod/XMLhelper.pm 2019-04-29 20:45:50.724704000 +0100 @@ -

gnupod - can't use hash as reference.

2019-04-29 Thread Steve Roome
an put music on my ipod once again. This problem has hampered me for a while, but I've not supplied a patch sooner and I've not done them as attachments either as I'm no longer sure of my perl-fu and I've a feeling that possibly this ought to be fixed differently. Hope this i

Re: ports/lang major version updates outside of OS version updates

2019-04-13 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:59:41PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:41 PM Steve Kargl > > > > How about taking the patch in my previous email, apply > > to your tree (any port committer can take the patch), > > and actually commit it! > &

Re: ports/lang major version updates outside of OS version updates

2019-04-13 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 08:49:43PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 8:01 PM Steve Kargl > > > > My patches have absolutely nothing to do with making > > 3.6 the default python version. > > > > I have added functions to libm that are include

Re: ports/lang major version updates outside of OS version updates

2019-04-13 Thread Steve Kargl
several the patching doesn't > appear to be complicated or difficult to maintain. > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 02:58:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > For those people following along in the mailing list, Dima > > sent me a private reply that took this thre

Re: Default python is 3.6?

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 02:58:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:18:50PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > So there is more "software bureaucracy" here than just applying one patch. > > > > % cd /usr/ports/lang > % s

Re: Python conflict on RPI2

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:47:54PM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > Is there any hope of simply replacing python27 with python36? The > goal at hand is merely to compile a working version of firefox. > In general, no. Python 2.7 and 3.6 are incompatible

Re: Python conflict on RPI2

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
ct. What else is worth trying? > > Thanks for reading, > > bob prohaska > pkg info | grep py > py.txt pkg delete -f py27-setuptools-40.8.0 install 3.6 re-install python27 -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing li

Re: Default python is 3.6?

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
*/ +-r = logpi - log(fabs(sinpi(absx))) - log(absx) - r; ++r = logpi - log(fabs(_freebsd_port_are_broken_sinpi(absx))) - log(absx) - r; + if (Py_IS_INFINITY(r)) + errno = ERANGE; + return r; -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@fre

Re: Default python is 3.6?

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:14:19PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Steve Kargl > > > > Doesn't matter what the python developer have done. > > Thanks, I see that you really appreciate my work... > Your work is appreciated as much as

Re: Default python is 3.6?

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:19:30PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 6:29 PM Steve Kargl > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:17:42AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > % find . -name math\* > > > ./work/Python-3.6.8/D

Re: Default python is 3.6?

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:17:42AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > % find . -name math\* > ./work/Python-3.6.8/Doc/library/math.rst > ./work/Python-3.6.8/Modules/mathmodule.c > ./work/Python-3.6.8/Lib/test/math_testcases.txt > ./work/stage/usr/local/lib/python3.6/test/math_test

Re: Default python is 3.6?

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:11:12AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > cd /usr/ports/lang/python36 > make && make install > > ===> Installing for python36-3.6.8_2 > ===> Checking if python36 is already installed > ===> Registering installation for python36-3.6.8_2

Default python is 3.6?

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
ped in /usr/ports/lang/python36 ? -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: "libicuuc.so.61" not found, required by "libephymisc.so" on RPi2

2019-04-12 Thread Steve Kargl
libicui18n.so.64 libicuio.so.63 libicuio.so.64 libicutu.so.63 libicutu.so.64 libicuuc.so.63 libicuuc.so.64 Choose your numbers accordingly. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-24 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 01:58:01AM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 8:09 PM Steve Kargl > > > Given that I actually don't > > program in python, that certainly seems to be an unreasonable > > request from the python maintainers. > > If

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-24 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 02:21:50PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 13:31:17 -0500 Diane Bruce wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 10:52:03AM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:07 AM Steve Kargl > >> wrote: > >>> O

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-22 Thread Steve Kargl
the lang/gcc ports is a long-time member of the GCC steering committee and a long-time maintainer of all gcc FreeBSD ports. There are very few FreeBSD users (like 3 of us) who have commit access to the gcc tree. Seems like a dubious idea to remove one of those 3. -- Steve _

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 07:09:11PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 08:44:54AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > Because FreeBSD usurped the name of a well-known library from a > > well-known open source project. Users might expect that that >

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 05:11:20PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:24:51 -0800 Steve Kargl > > > BTW, if you compare gcc trunks symbol map > > ./x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0/libgcc/libgcc.map > > with src/lib/libgcc_s/Version.map, you'll find tha

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-22 Thread Steve Kargl
in base needs /lib/libgcc_s, then let's remove it. If nothing in base needs it, let's rename name it to libfreebsd_s.so. > 3) With my gfortran patch you don't need to implement anything. It's an > apply-once-and-stop-worrying-about-it solution for all versions of FreeBSD. Yo

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-22 Thread Steve Kargl
t do this we'd have > this libgcc_s problem all over the place. It makes perfect sense to > make gfortran do the same thing. I'm fine with your patch. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mai

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:32:03AM -0500, Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 16:47, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > > > The missing symbols are > > > > % objdump -x lib/libgfortran.so | grep GCC_4.6.0 | awk '{print $5}' | sort > > Thank you for co

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
gcc8/libgcc_s.so.1 880:-lgcc_s.2 => /safe/sgk/work/x/lib/libgcc_s.so.2 % ldconfig -r | grep libgfortran 808:-lgfortran.5 => /usr/local/lib/gcc8/libgfortran.so.5 876:-lgfortran.5 => /safe/sgk/work/x/lib/libgfortran.so.5 6 is picked up due t

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
re from NetBSD: eqtf2.c and unordtf2.c -- steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:24:51AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > As anyone tried adding an empty sections to FreeBSD's > libgcc_s, > > /* > * Empty sections to work around FreeBSD abusing the name > * of a well-known GCC library. > */ > GCC_4.6.0 {

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
figure > out what question to ask, because, "libgcc_s? WTF?, this is python!" > In addition, oftentimes people have sometimes big pipelines of > different programs executing. So writing a shell script wrapper > around each and every one of those custom programs... not going

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-21 Thread Steve Kargl
nown-freebsd13.0/libgcc/libgcc.map with src/lib/libgcc_s/Version.map, you'll find that that maps are no one-to-one. As anyone tried adding an empty sections to FreeBSD's libgcc_s, /* * Empty sections to work around FreeBSD abusing the name * of a well-known GCC library. */ GCC_4.6.0 {

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:37:36PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 17.02.2019 12:11, Steve Kargl wrot: > > > > > There is a problem with the order of libgcc_s.so.1 > > in the cache created by ldconfig. rtld will use > > the first one it finds. If it fails, it f

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 01:13:15PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 17.02.2019 12:56, Steve Kargl wrote: > > >> 17.02.2019 12:11, Steve Kargl wrot: > >>> > >>> There is a problem with the order of libgcc_s.so.1 > >>> in the cache created by ld

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 01:35:31PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 17.02.2019 13:19, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > For whatever reason, there are situations where the rpath > > isn't set in the library. Read the rtld manpage. You're > > hitting #5 in the list. >

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Steve Kargl
ldconfig -r | grep libgcc_s'. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-17 Thread Steve Kargl
kage. > There is a problem with the order of libgcc_s.so.1 in the cache created by ldconfig. rtld will use the first one it finds. If it fails, it fails. It does not look to see if there is a second entry. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1

2019-02-16 Thread Steve Kargl
local/lib/gcc8 setenv LD_RUN_PATH /usr/local/lib/gcc8 -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: drm2 removed?

2019-02-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:20:20AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:12:05AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Anyone have any idea which recent change broke the > > drm-legacy-kmod port. This is why I raised an issue > > with removal of drm2 from src/sys.

Re: drm2 removed?

2019-02-11 Thread Steve Kargl
kdb_backtrace vpanic panic trap_fatal trap_pfault trap calltrap --- trap 0xc, eip = 0xcc277a, esp = 0x3cebd4, ebp = 0x3cec20 vmem_periodic(0,1,c671ce,a5ad79c,0,...) at vmem_periodic+0x18a/ taskqueue_run_locked taskqueue_thread_loop fork_exit fork_trampoline() at 0xffc033ba/frame 0xa3

Re: drm2 removed?

2019-02-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:42:29PM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2/11/19 6:36 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > The patch allows the port to be built. > > > > kldloading the i915kms module causes a 'black screen > > of death' > > > &g

Re: drm2 removed?

2019-02-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:05:03PM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2/11/19 5:20 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:12:05AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> Anyone have any idea which recent change broke the > >> drm-legacy-kmod port. This is why

Re: drm2 removed?

2019-02-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:12:05AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > Anyone have any idea which recent change broke the > drm-legacy-kmod port. This is why I raised an issue > with removal of drm2 from src/sys. How is suppose > to be fixed? > It was r343567. The merging of PAE and N

drm2 removed?

2019-02-11 Thread Steve Kargl
rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/drm-legacy-kmod *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/drm-legacy-kmod ===>>> make build failed for graphics/drm-legacy-kmod ===>>> Abortin

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 15:18:20 -0800 Steve Kargl > wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 03:14:15PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/qt-dist.mk has: > >> > >> .

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-10 Thread Steve Kargl
ring configure of qt5-gui, it does try to use sse2, sse3, ssse3, and even the unsupported avx. The build still dies. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any ma

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-10 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:24:43AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > My reference to building for armv7 not having a problem in > > my builds is an example of a 32-bit-target context for > > qt5-gui. So

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-10 Thread Steve Kargl
2, -msse3, -mssse3, -mcx16, -mfxsr, and -msahf to CFLAGS to see which one is causing the problem. If adding all of the -target-feature options turned on by core2 work with i686, I'll then up i686 and repeat. In the end, this looks like a "wrong code" issue with llvm/clang/cla

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-10 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 02:56:17PM +, Carmel NY wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 06:40:01 -0800, Steve Kargl stated: > > >On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 08:31:12AM +0100, Tobias C. Berner wrote: > >> Moin moin > >> > >> Make sure all your qt5-(qt5-gui dependency

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-10 Thread Steve Kargl
gt; > > > [...] > > So it looks like it's 32bit specific; maybe i386 only. > Yes, likely. I'll note that valgrind hass been broken for a long time, now that I think about it was built with -march=native. -- Steve _

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-10 Thread Steve Kargl
/qt5-gui % make (wait a long time) Build dies if CFLAGS+=-march=native is in /etc/make.conf. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-10 Thread Steve Kargl
le:root[210] find work -name qdrawhelper.o path_to/qdrawhelper.o mobile:root[211] nm path_to/qdrawhelper.o | grep memfill U _Z12qt_memfill16Ptti U _Z12qt_memfill32Pjji 00017bb0 T _Z12qt_memfill64Pyyi -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-09 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 07:32:27PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > Anyone have any pointers on building x11-toolkits/qt5-gui on > FreeBSD-current? My attempts end with > > c++ -Wl,--as-needed (boat load of info removed). > qdrawhelper.cpp:(.text+0x2d0ba): undefin

Building qt5-gui port?

2019-02-09 Thread Steve Kargl
in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-gui ===>>> make build failed for x11-toolkits/qt5-gui ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: portmaster x11-toolkits/qt5-gui This command has been saved to /tmp/portmasterfail.txt -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: devel/jsoncpp and staging?

2018-12-18 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:46:33AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > From: Steve Kargl > Subject: Re: devel/jsoncpp and staging? > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:07:05 -0800 > > > Thanks for the pointer to email thread. Guess I'll > > upgrade from 341703 to top-of-tree

Re: devel/jsoncpp and staging?

2018-12-18 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 02:35:00AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > From: Steve Kargl > Subject: Re: devel/jsoncpp and staging? > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:21:46 -0800 > > >> I cannot reproduce the error you encounter, what version of FreeBSD are > >> you runni

Re: devel/jsoncpp and staging?

2018-12-18 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:54:29AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:25:10PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:48:57PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > I must be missing a change in how staging works. > > > > >

Re: devel/jsoncpp and staging?

2018-12-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:48:57PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > I must be missing a change in how staging works. > > % cd /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp > % make > > ===> Staging for jsoncpp-1.8.1_5 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > (cd /usr/ports/devel/json

devel/jsoncpp and staging?

2018-12-17 Thread Steve Kargl
cal/lib /bin/ln -s libjsoncpp.so.1.8.1 /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libjsoncpp.so.1 /bin/ln -s libjsoncpp.so.1.8.1 /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libjsoncpp.so cp -f /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp/work/jsoncpp-1.8.1/pkg-config/jsoncpp.pc.in /usr/port

Re: Massive PORTREVSION bump for gcc8

2018-12-12 Thread Steve Kargl
r any new compiler version to either gcc or llvm. Does adding DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=GCC=7 to /etc/make.conf prevent the need to update 300 ports. -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports T

Re: Strange interaction between py-pyglet and py-numpy

2018-11-26 Thread Steve Kargl
t; > > > > > Any ideas? > > > I want my pony still. > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/libgcc%20problem > setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH path/to/correct/libgcc_s.so.1 -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.

Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found

2018-11-20 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:52:58AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:43:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:57:22PM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > > Using pkg delete resolved the ImageMagick vs ImageMagic6 conflict, > > >

Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found

2018-11-19 Thread Steve Kargl
;libicuuc.so.62 libicuuc.so.63' >> /etc/libmap.conf -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: pkg version is slowwww

2018-10-26 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On 26. Oct 2018, at 20:03, Steve Kargl > > wrote: > > > > I recently updated to pkg-1.10.5_5, and I now > > find to command "pkg version -vl '<'" to be > >

pkg version is slowwww

2018-10-26 Thread Steve Kargl
ime pkg info" gives 0.01 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

  1   2   3   4   5   >