# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-02-12 17:55:10 +0100:
> if you are wondering, I didn't deliberately commit such regression.
BTW, what would you suggest in terms of regression tests if you didn't
have to take care of it (but didn't want to punish the other maintainer
eihter)?
--
How many Vietnam vets
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-02-12 17:55:10 +0100:
> Roman Neuhauser ha scritto:
> >I'm not sure I understand you correctly. The change broke the module,
> >and in an extremely dangerous way: affected programs silently change
> >their behavior. What advantages could the
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-02-12 17:27:17 +0100:
> Roman Neuhauser ha scritto:
> >I have PHP 5.2.1 w/ SPL compiled from ports (lang/php5, devel/php5-spl),
> >and it appears Countable is ineffective (the count() method is not
> >called). 5.2.1 with SPL compiled in works.
>
Hello,
I have PHP 5.2.1 w/ SPL compiled from ports (lang/php5, devel/php5-spl),
and it appears Countable is ineffective (the count() method is not
called). 5.2.1 with SPL compiled in works.
Can anyone confirm this problem?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ 1019:0 > cat tmp/count.php
php tmp/count.php
int(1
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-01-20 11:18:50 +0100:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > I'm writing a port for a program written in PHP 5. It depends (BUILD_
> > and RUN_) on ${PEARDIR}/Console/Getopt.php:devel/pear, unfortunately
> > devel/pear simply informs the user that they
I'm writing a port for a program written in PHP 5. It depends (BUILD_
and RUN_) on ${PEARDIR}/Console/Getopt.php:devel/pear, unfortunately
devel/pear simply informs the user that they need to configure php.ini
(see devel/pear/files/pkg-message.in), and my port needlessly fails
during the build tar
wxPython-2.6.3.3 fails to build on my FreeBSD-6.1 with Python-2.5, with
cc -DNDEBUG -O -pipe -D__wchar_t=wchar_t -DTHREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x10 -O -pipe
-fPIC -DSWIG_TYPE_TABLE=_wxPython_table -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DWXP_USE_THREAD=1
-UNDEBUG -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LA
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-09-25 13:01:57 -0500:
> --On Monday, September 25, 2006 10:45:14 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >People still use Apache 1.3? (Kidding...)
>
> Absolutely. And until I can figure out how to get cgi working in apache2,
> I will *continue* to use a
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-05-08 22:27:41 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> I've just discovered that one of my ports has been updated without my
> approval. The CVS log states maintainer timeout, but I don't recall ever
> getting a notification. Maybe it got shredded by my spam filter in
> which case it's enti
