# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-02-12 17:55:10 +0100: > Roman Neuhauser ha scritto: > >I'm not sure I understand you correctly. The change broke the module, > >and in an extremely dangerous way: affected programs silently change > >their behavior. What advantages could the shared library have over a > >working PHP? > > The module was broken even before in a different part. The fact that now > affects you doesn't mean was better before. When this feature was > introduced there was a flame-storm between php devs because the presence > of an optional extension shouldn't modify the behaviour of the standard > library. This is bad coding, but, as I said, I'm working to fix it. And, > if you are wondering, I didn't deliberately commit such regression.
Thanks for taking care of it. I appreciate the hard time PHP's "organic" growth gives any responsible downstream maintainer. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
