The cmake test just tries to compile:
#include
std::atomic x;
int main() {
return x;
}
What happens if you try to compile this small code with your host compiler?
Roman
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:42:49AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> [I experiment with system-clang based
> buildworld and/or b
Can we arrange exp builds with FORCE_BASE_CC_FOR_TESTING=clang that
will report all ports with USE_GCC=* but build with clang?
Lets say every three months or so?
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 07:45:23PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> The commit mail hasn't gone through yet, so I guess I need to post this
-dumpspecs is a gcc internal thing that clang will never support (it doesnt use
specs). It's wrong for ports to mess with the internals of the compiler and
this should be fixed in a clean way.
Ie. we have to replace the -dumpspec | grep something with a saner check.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:07:
if some of the ports
you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them. A small introduction into
the Clang+Ports can be read at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang.
Please focus on the biggest offenders (ie. ports that prevent the most other
ports from building).
Thank you for he
other
ports from building).
Thank you for helping us!
Roman Divacky
pgpFKX1RRwGhM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> Note: almost all linuxolator changes where merged from 8-CURRENT to
> 7-STABLE. But I'm not sure if the default compat.linux.osrelease is
> ever changed to 7.x.
I am against ever switching to 2.6 on default in 7.x
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:49:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > You might have noticed a thread on the mailing list called "ports system
> > > woes". The submitter pointed out an inefficiency in pkg_delete routine,
> > > that parses the whole /var/db/pkg over and over again for every
>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:18:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Roman Divacky wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 05:18:29PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >>You might have noticed a thread on the mailing list called "ports system
> >>woes". The submitter poin
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 05:18:29PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> You might have noticed a thread on the mailing list called "ports system
> woes". The submitter pointed out an inefficiency in pkg_delete routine,
> that parses the whole /var/db/pkg over and over again for every
> dependency of a pac
on the state of flash9 in linuxulator...
I tried to debug it but it's (firefox+flash9) a huge program that generates
like
1.5 million of lines of trace. I spend several hours staring at that but didn't
find
anything obvious... I would be more than happy if someone proved I am stupid
and I
ove
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:02:47PM -0700, Zephiris wrote:
> Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> >
> > I too am confused, if you have flash 9 working in firefox on RELENG_7
> > please give us a detailed how to there are just a TON of people
> > looking for this. I have 5 systems I would test it out on right n
> > There was a report on -current a while ago that a preliminary patch
> > to fix the non-threadsafeness of mmap(2) MAP_FIXED also makes flash9 work,
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-August/075968.html
I wrote that and I was wrong... it doesnt seem to fix the f
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:46:39PM +0800, Thomas Zander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> recently I had a look at the upcoming version of the PCB layout tool
> eagle, in beta test at the moment. I am currently maintaining both the
> international (cad/linux-eagle) and german ports of this tool.
> This new beta ve
> If you find a glibc-2.4 for FC4 we can import it somehow. If you
no we cant. glibc-2.4 requires 2.6 kernel. ie. its the same operation as
switching to newer FC
> don't, we need to wait for the possibility to go to FC^ or newer. But
> as from FC5 on, we need 2.6.x emulation for the linuxulat
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:34:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >> I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
> >> index" and pkg_version and things like th
> Acroread will use linux system calls to start the shell. This results
> in the linux shell (/compat/linux/bin/sh) to start (linuxulator
> directory prefixing). The linux shell will use the same linuxulator
> directory prefixing to start /compat/linux/usr/bin/lpr. So we're in
> the same si
16 matches
Mail list logo
