I tried compiling Thunderbird from ports, but it's too big, and there
are errors. I'll try to do it some time again, starting clean.
But in the mean time...
Choosing the macOS extension/add-on format seems to be working for the
binary distribution.
Just go to Most Popular add-ons, and Ligthning
ote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Rastko P <mailto:lylecor...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I used the portsnap fetch>extract>fetch>update
>
> then built portmaster,
>
> then used pkg version -l "<", which gave 2 out-of-date,
>
>
c5-0
lang/gjs-7
lang/guile2-1
lang/lua52-11
lang/perl5.24-23
lang/python2-31
lang/python27-76
lang/python3-14
lang/python35-17
lang/spidermonkey170-1
lang/spidermonkey24-1
lang/vala-1
On 13.06.2017 20:09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Rastko P <mailto:lylecor...@
versions of software
than that which had been built by the portmaster session, to which I
replied 'oh, no [n]o', which was the default.
But in the end, it seems to have not installed anything (?!). Why did it
pull in all those dependencies? Where are the binaries?
On 13.06.2017
g something huge here.
Cheers.
On 13.06.2017 17:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 13.06.2017 22:25, Rastko P пишет:
>> I have some experience with FreeBSD. I don't mind building ports. You
>> know sometimes it's necessary (most FreeBSD software is ported, and
>&
rs, when I
already compiled them.
Any clear-cut solutions?
I know you can install binary packages, that is not relevant to my
question, unless you are being somewhat cynical.
On 13.06.2017 17:05, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2017, at 15:51, Rastko P wrote:
>> I think my machine w
I think my machine will die from severe dehydration if every other port
keeps recompiling compilers.
The last make for the "documentation translation" port took 6 hours or
more. What's that in fan oil costs?
How to prevent this?
___
freebsd-ports@f
