On 2016-04-28 05:30, Willem Offermans wrote:
Dear Matthias and FreeBSD friends,
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:48:16AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 23.04.2016 um 12:02 schrieb Willem Offermans:
> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>
> In my attempt to juvenile an old FreeBSD beast, I encountered another
> h
On 2016-04-21 14:10, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 4/21/16 1:31 PM, Alphons van Werven wrote:
Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Mailman logs show connection errors.
I don't know exactly how Postfix and Mailman (try to) communicate with
one
another, but is it possible that SysV IPC has to be enabled for
On 2015-12-23 11:55, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Michael Jung writes:
"pkg audit" on my system returns the following CVE's for ffmpeg. I
have noted
in the list below that http://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html claims
these CVE's
were fixed in the ffmpeg version noted.
Is this th
Hi,
"pkg audit" on my system returns the following CVE's for ffmpeg. I have
noted
in the list below that http://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html claims these
CVE's
were fixed in the ffmpeg version noted.
Is this the correct place/list to report updates to that vuxml can be
updated?
I know the
On 2015-12-16 03:15, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, December 15, 2015 a las 05:31:39PM -0500, Michael Jung
escribió:
> I still have a copy of the failed workspace.
>
>matthias
FWIW
# $FreeBSD: head/editors/libreoffice/Makefile 403436 2015-12-09
23:43:30Z jbeich $
buil
On 2015-12-15 09:02, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Monday, December 14, 2015 a las 06:59:48AM +0100, Matthias
Apitz escribió:
> > There are other (older) cases visible with Google showing the same
> > problem, for example:
> > https://forums-web2.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1025000.html
> > saying th
On 2015-04-27 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:21:40AM -0400, Michael Jung wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but pkg 1.5.1 wants to remove
locked
packages. The packages are indeed really removed.
Thanks.
--mikej
"pkg lock is used to lock packag
On 2015-04-27 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:21:40AM -0400, Michael Jung wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but pkg 1.5.1 wants to remove
locked
packages. The packages are indeed really removed.
Thanks.
--mikej
"pkg lock is used to lock packag
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but pkg 1.5.1 wants to remove
locked
packages. The packages are indeed really removed.
Thanks.
--mikej
"pkg lock is used to lock packages against reinstallation, modification
or
deletion."
FreeBSD charon.corp.pai.local 10.1-RC1-p2 FreeBSD
I do not
On 2015-01-19 09:20, Michael Jung wrote:
FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r276896:
pkg 1.4.4 or pkg 1.4.6
poudriere 3.1.1 under 11.0-CURRENT r275419
On i386 only pkg complains with "Fail to kill children". I have
checked some but not all packages
and they appear to be updated as expected so
FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r276896:
pkg 1.4.4 or pkg 1.4.6
poudriere 3.1.1 under 11.0-CURRENT r275419
On i386 only pkg complains with "Fail to kill
children". I have checked some but not all packages
and they appear to be updated as expected so this
is a heads up.
I do not see this behaviour with
On 2014-12-23 10:20, Mark Martinec wrote:
Tijl Coosemans wrote:
This card is still supported by x11/nvidia-driver-304
Mark Martinec wrote:
Good suggestion! It does seem to draw screen and scroll
much faster than NV (although it seems to stall from time
to time (like unresponsive mouse) on a b
I noted that when running 'pkg upgrade' only 50 candidates where
detected when I have 1158
ports installed. What am I missing?
My local repository 0local is built using poudriere 3.1-RC3
[root@charon ~]# pkg -v
1.4.0.rc3
[root@charon ~]# pkg update -f
Updating 0local repository catalogue...
Fe
On 2014-10-31 15:33, Beeblebrox wrote:
graphics/png has been failing like this for some time, and I would go
around
the problem by fetching the newer binary then re-starting poudriere.
That
trick did not work this time, so now I'm stuck.
Same error when building on host (non-poudriere). Port u
On 2014-10-30 13:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:53:29PM -0400, Michael Jung wrote:
Hello:
Errors shown toward end of email.
Note this is a cleanly installed jail but an previously built
repository
from an older
version of head. I can nuke the head repository and
Hello:
Errors shown toward end of email.
Note this is a cleanly installed jail but an previously built repository
from an older
version of head. I can nuke the head repository and rebuild from
scratch but I wanted to
present these errors first.
--mikej
FreeBSD bsd11 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 1
I hope this may be an additional data point.
I also had grave issues with NEW_XORG. When I did experience a problem 99% of
the
time the computer locked up. My uptime was never more than a 24 hour period.
No crash dumps, black screen, no keyboard light activity in toggling caps lock.
Howeve
On 2014-08-20 12:34, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect LD
On 2014-09-12 17:46, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/11/2014 8:51 AM, Michael Jung wrote:
Why does "poudriere bulk" need to bail because a single package has a
missing port origin and not continue to build other packages in the
package list?
If I remove x11/mate from my package list poudr
Why does "poudriere bulk" need to bail because a single package has a
missing port origin and not continue to build other packages in the
package list?
If I remove x11/mate from my package list poudriere rocks on building
all my other ports.
The missing origin is a RUN_DEPENDS in the x11/mat
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Why does "poudriere bulk" need to bail because of a single package that
has a missing port origin and not build other packages in the package
list?
If I remove x11/mate from my package list poudriere rocks on building
all my other ports.
The missing origin is a RUN_DEPENDS in the x11/mate
NIX THIS!
Damn, I ran this on a box with the SSP repository configured. Hope no-one
wasted any time on this.
Pkg has updated on numerous other machines without incident.
:-(
-Original Message-
From: Michael Jung
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:10 PM
To: 'Ports FreeBS
Following your instructions:
root@bsd11:/usr/home/mikej # pkg -v
1.3.6
root@bsd11:/usr/home/mikej # pkg update -f
Updating repository catalogue
Fetching meta.txz: 100% of 944 B
Fetching digests.txz: 100% of 2 MB
Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% of 5 MB
Adding new entries: 100%
Incremental update co
On 2014-08-22 16:17, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/22/2014 1:16 PM, mikej wrote:
On , Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be add
25 matches
Mail list logo
