Re: FreeBSD 11 desktop - unsupported by ports committers die to amdgpu

Well it's an upstream bug. So port maintainer is not the issue. It's being worked after n looks like simple fix per upstream bug report. On Sep 6, 2017 1:31 PM, "Rozhuk Ivan" wrote: > Hi! > > Why commiters ignory FreeBSD 11.x users!? > > graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build: https://bugs.fr

Re: www/nginx: nginx 1.12 doesn't work with XRID_HEADER option enabled

ussen" wrote: > On 04/30/2017 11:03 AM, Matthew Donovan wrote: > >> Nginx 1.12 can no longer have duplicate stuff in configuration. It does >> it for request_ip as well. It's by design. >> > > That doesn't change the fact that our port should not include

Re: www/nginx: nginx 1.12 doesn't work with XRID_HEADER option enabled

Nginx 1.12 can no longer have duplicate stuff in configuration. It does it for request_ip as well. It's by design. On Apr 30, 2017 3:56 AM, "Thomas Steen Rasmussen" wrote: > Hello, > > Do not upgrade nginx to 1.12 if you have XRID_HEADER enabled. The > module is incompatible with nginx 1.12 and

Re: Licence practice for dependencies - making use of more restrictive licences optional

Well you have a point however some ports require gpl software to compile like opendnssec it is just a build requirement and not a run dependant. You would need to speak with developers to have them change their software to not depend on these restricted licenses. As looking at the build system for

Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency

This might be due to you had port installed already and it got picked up first On Oct 24, 2016 7:59 AM, "Guido Falsi" wrote: > On 10/24/16 13:15, David Demelier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Upgraded my system to 11.0-RELEASE-p1 and using 2016Q4 branch, I have a > > small issue regarding lighttpd de

Re: freebsd-update and portsnap users still at risk of compromise

You mean operating system as distribution is a Linux term. There's not much different between HARDENEDBSD and FreeBSD besides that HardenedBSD fixes vulnerabilities and has a an excellent ASLR system compared to the proposed one for FreeBSD. On Aug 9, 2016 3:10 PM, "Roger Marquis" wrote: > Timel

Re: is this a problem with screen, pkg or portupgrade?

Yup everything is good it's just the way screen does versions sometimes. On Jul 18, 2016 8:28 AM, "Pierre Guinoiseau" wrote: > Why do you think there is a problem? 4.04.00 == 4.4.0 (and not 4.0.4), > everything is fine, just ignore the leading zeros. ;) > > On 19/07/2016 00:58, tech-lists wrote:

Re: OS version upgrade detected. Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended

Not sure how this is bad it just reinstalls pkg for the new ABI. Ports/packages is placed in the database by pkg. So you will get that warning when even doing pkg list On Jul 13, 2016 9:59 AM, "Franco Fichtner" wrote: > Hi Julian, > > I ran into something similar, maybe this make.conf flag helps:

Re: textproc/elasticsearch2 Update to 2.1.1

So your not following protocol then as the mailing list should only be asked until after the timeout happens. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-por

Re: opendkim-2.10.3_1 - builds but won't install on 10.2-RELEASE-p7?

On Nov 20, 2015 9:50 AM, "Karl Pielorz" wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've just installed a fresh 10.2-RELEASE amd64 system, freebsd-updated/installed (gives me p7) - then portsnap'd and tried to install opendkim (2.10.3) - with opendbx support. > > This seems to build ok - but 'make install' nets: > > " >

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory [11 Jun 2015]

You might want to look at http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/cperciva/portsnap-build/ might help you with portsnap. On Jun 14, 2015 9:36 AM, "Michelle Sullivan" wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 13/06/2015 19:41, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > > > >> How about one for how to make your own portsn

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory [11 Jun 2015]

This is really old it was found in the last vulnerability. Guess openssl decided to finally fix it On Jun 11, 2015 1:38 PM, "Roger Marquis" wrote: > The ports-secteam knows about this but posting here in case someone wants > to > update ahead of the port, from this morning's Hackernews: > >

Re: New pkg audit / vuln.xml failures (php55, unzoo)

I found the ports security reporting without issues http://www.freebsd.org/security/reporting.html. Appears someone should read reporting page Instead of saying information is not correct. On May 27, 2015 12:40 PM, "Roger Marquis" wrote: > If you find a vulnerability such as a new CVE or mailing

Re: Why pkg-install is run during port build?

With FreeBSD packages and ports are the same. As it is tje same database On Mar 30, 2015 4:22 PM, "Yuri" wrote: > pkg-install is run once during port's 'make', and another time during > port's 'make install'. > > Is this intended? pkg-install is for the package, and port make didn't > build/insta

Re: Broken port: handbrake

On Mar 21, 2015 8:21 PM, "Matt Klein" wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm having a problem with the port "handbrake". > > From the Makefile: > # Created by: Andrew Thompson > # $FreeBSD: head/multimedia/handbrake/Makefile 374303 2014-12-08 16:48:38Z > tijl $ > > The build and install of the port succeeds,

Firefox3 does nothing when window pops up

I have seen this has been posted before, but could not see a fix. I've tried everything to get it to run, along with some searches. Firefox3 still does nothing once the main window comes up, I type an url into the address bar and firefox3 just sits there. Was wondering if anyone figured this proble

Re: firefox3 port missing firefox-config or firefox3-config

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:25:52PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:06:02 -0500, Naram Qashat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >I was trying to modify the VLC port to enable the Firefox plugin, but > >when I added firefox3 to the list of USE_GECKO and tried to build the

Re: Commiting new ports

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote: > Hi, > >I hope this is the right list to ask this question. I recently > commited a new port, and received two messages from "ports." The first > one noted that a person had assigned the port to himself, and the second > mai

Re: port maintaince procedural questions

On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 08:49:15PM -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I have brought a older port maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the > current version I have done all the work needed to make it > committable I have several questions

Re: ImageMagick-6.4.1-3_1 selftest fails

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:47:51PM -0400, Kitche wrote: > > Kitche wrote: > >>> David Wolfskill wrote: > >>> My experience was that ImageMagick did build, but it also put up a > >>> little window with a message on it. So my feeling is that the OP is > >>> correct, and that at least on some version