On 6/26/20, Donald Wilde wrote:
> On 6/26/20, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
>> ## Donald Wilde (dwil...@gmail.com):
>>
>>> This is 12-STABLE as of a few days ago, and yes, it's running on
>>> amd64/HAMMER.
>>
>> So, llvm 10. As I guessed
On 6/26/20, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Donald Wilde (dwil...@gmail.com):
>
>> This is 12-STABLE as of a few days ago, and yes, it's running on
>> amd64/HAMMER.
>
> So, llvm 10. As I guessed :)
>
>> I'll see if I can figure out how to get th
On 6/26/20, Donald Wilde wrote:
> On 6/26/20, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
>> ## Donald Wilde (dwil...@gmail.com):
[snip]
>> I can see about two options to get out of that situation:
>> - disable option LLVM on postgresql*-server, or
>> - make sure there'
On 6/26/20, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Donald Wilde (dwil...@gmail.com):
>
>> I ran into an issue, documented in the attachments, that seems to
>> point to some quantity that does not include version 8 of the port,
>> only 1 - 7. Being a tidy soul, I used m
Folks,
Not to start a flame war, but I've had a few issues in the ports tree,
as STABLE readers have no doubt seen.
This is a Request for Insights.
IMHO, it's a black hole to stay current with ports designed to utilize
GNU tools, especially documentation tools.
I realize that given the complexi
