Bernard,
Thank-you for maintaining this invaluable resource. Whenever I experience
a problem that I suspect is due to ssl/crypto, I check here
https://wiki.freebsd.org/LibreSSL/Ports
and then bugzilla!
For anyone considering migrating their openssl to libressl, this is an
invaluable resource. (
Hi Bryan,
On 08/26/16 22:44, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/26/2016 3:21 PM, Russell L. Carter wrote:
Hi,
So I'm in the middle of jumping a herd of 6 boxen from 10.3 to 11, and
Upgrading/Replacing a poudriere jail from 10.3 to 11 normally would
rebuild all packages since there would either be no
On 8/29/2016 4:27 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 30 Aug, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to report one "dangerous" problem with "poudriere ports -d"
>> command. There should be a "-p treename" but if it is omitted, poudriere
>> deletes tree "default"
>>
>> This is my error, I know, b
On 30 Aug, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to report one "dangerous" problem with "poudriere ports -d"
> command. There should be a "-p treename" but if it is omitted, poudriere
> deletes tree "default"
>
> This is my error, I know, but I think poudrier should print a warning or
Hi,
I would like to report one "dangerous" problem with "poudriere ports -d"
command. There should be a "-p treename" but if it is omitted, poudriere
deletes tree "default"
This is my error, I know, but I think poudrier should print a warning or
do not assume I wanted delete "default"
root
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 23:18:21 +0800
Ben Woods wrote:
> On 22 May 2016 at 03:56, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > New release 0.6.0 of x11/xfce4-dashboard was published. But I noticed core
> > dump with Xfdashboard utility (not the settings manager) on 9.3-RELEASE
> > (with Radeon Xpres
On 29 August 2016 at 18:34, Bernard Spil wrote:
> Thanks Chris! Added these (and reasons) to wiki.freebsd.org/OpenSSL/1.1.0
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Chris wrote:
>> On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving i
Thanks Chris! Added these (and reasons) to wiki.freebsd.org/OpenSSL/1.1.0
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Chris wrote:
> On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to
>> ports@ where this belongs a lot more.
>>
>> +--O
On 22 May 2016 at 03:56, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> New release 0.6.0 of x11/xfce4-dashboard was published. But I noticed core
> dump with Xfdashboard utility (not the settings manager) on 9.3-RELEASE
> (with Radeon Xpress 200M), 10.3-RELEASE (with Vesa, this box needs to be
> updated to
Free Project Management Software Buyer's Guide
Compare Systems
These port updates are in preparation for publication of RELEASE-11.0.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212201
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212202
Thanks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.fr
On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to
> ports@ where this belongs a lot more.
>
> +--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote:
> | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL
> |
On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to
> ports@ where this belongs a lot more.
>
> +--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote:
> | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL
> |
Thank you for your replies. As I am using the application used so I want to
make sure that it wont be having future problems. I have read the linked
porters handbook but it will be more helpful for me to understand if there
is an example where to start and how to go over it. I maybe asking so much
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On 29/08/2016 07:35, Rommel Escuadro wrote:
> What is the knowledge requirement for adopting a port?
The literal, by the book, answer is that you have to understand enough
about standard development tools to be able to generate a diff changing
the MAINTAINER line to your own e-mail address, and en
Dirk, it wont be as messy as the havoc it can cause on production
machines. There is several ports which have multiple versions without
a mess, I do not see wh openssl would be any different as the version
used can be put in the make.conf.
I just had a quick glance at the 1.2 changelog, and it wi
17 matches
Mail list logo
