On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 23:18:21 +0800 Ben Woods <woods...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 May 2016 at 03:56, Olivier Duchateau <olivi...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > New release 0.6.0 of x11/xfce4-dashboard was published. But I noticed core > > dump with Xfdashboard utility (not the settings manager) on 9.3-RELEASE > > (with Radeon Xpress 200M), 10.3-RELEASE (with Vesa, this box needs to be > > updated to -CURRENT, but currently I don't have enough time). > > > > Patch is available here [1] or in Xfce devel repository (in 4.12 branch). > > > > Crash is related to Clutter and OpenGL. > > > > So if someone can test/run with recent GPU drivers, I appreciate it. > > > > Regards, > > > > [1] https://people.freebsd.org/~olivierd/patches/xfce4-dashboard.diff > > > Hi Olivier, > > I have just tried this a few times, and it seems to be working ok for me. > > I am using the scfb driver, as I have a broadwell laptop and am not using > the latest drm-next graphics driver source tree. > > I do get the following output when running xfdashboard from the console, > but it still works fine: > > $ xfdashboard > > (xfdashboard:2862): xfdashboard-CRITICAL **: > xfdashboard_window_tracker_monitor_is_primary: assertion > 'XFDASHBOARD_IS_WINDOW_TRACKER_MONITOR(self)' failed > libuwind: _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIE > (xfdashboard:2862): xfdashboard-WARNING **: Determination of application by > checking environment variables is not supported at this system. > libuwind: _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIElibuwind: > _unw_add_dynamic_fde: bad fde: FDE is really a CIE% > > Regards, > Ben Thanks Ben, for feedback. This week-end I'll test on my machine running 11.0-RC2 (when migration will be complete). If everything is ok, I'll commit. Reagrds, -- Olivier Duchateau <olivi...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
