On 3 February 2016 at 23:35, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Another application which I've worked with the developer to make it
> better on FreeBSD is sngrep:
> https://github.com/irontec/sngrep
>
> Still being new to porting applications, my attempt isn't working well.
Do you have a compl
Hello All,
Another application which I've worked with the developer to make it
better on FreeBSD is sngrep:
https://github.com/irontec/sngrep
Still being new to porting applications, my attempt isn't working well.
Here's the Makefile attempt:
PORTNAME= sngrep
PORTVERSION=1.2.0
DISTVERS
On 02/03/16 10:40, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III
mailto:w...@hiwaay.net>>wrote:
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig.
On 2016-02-03 14:44, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:43 PM, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven
wrote:
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
Is a v8 port in the works?
That port doesn't have a maintainer, so someone will have to volunteer
to
upgrade it. If you like, I can try to find some time to
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:43 PM, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven
wrote:
> Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>
>> Is a v8 port in the works?
>
> That port doesn't have a maintainer, so someone will have to volunteer to
> upgrade it. If you like, I can try to find some time to have a shot at it.
>
I know that the por
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Is a v8 port in the works?
That port doesn't have a maintainer, so someone will have to volunteer to
upgrade it. If you like, I can try to find some time to have a shot at it.
Fonz
--
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
signature.asc
Descrip
The SETI@home projects recently shows this in /var/db/boinc/stdoutdae.txt
03-Feb-2016 19:48:40 [SETI@home] Your app_info.xml file doesn't have a
usable version of SETI@home v8.
Is a v8 port in the works?
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
___
freebsd-ports@f
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
> On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
>
>>
>> On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>>
>>> When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
>>>
>>
>> make showconfig shows the configuratio
On 02/03/16 09:45, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:59, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
make showconfig shows th
On 03.02.2016 15:59, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
make showconfig shows the configuration at your *local* portstree. It
d
On 02/03/16 09:18, Chris H wrote:
Hello, William. On a side note; I can't help but notice
that your mail always reports it was written on:
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 -0800(Unknown)
Is your clock working as intended?
--Chris
Yes, I have my local LAN timezones set to make my LAN time
Hello, William. On a side note; I can't help but notice
that your mail always reports it was written on:
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 -0800(Unknown)
Is your clock working as intended?
--Chris
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:06:51 -0553.75 "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote
> On 02/03/16 08:49, Torst
Uhub starts giving this error (below) and using client it is not able to
connect
ERROR: net_setsockopt, fd=3: Socket operation on non-socket (38)
2016-01-22 21:15:50 ERROR: net_set_nosigpipe, fd=3: Socket operation on
non-socket (38)
2016-01-22 21:15:50 ERROR: Unable to open file /etc/uhub/users
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
make showconfig shows the configuration at your *local* portstree. It
does not affect or display the settings of pkg.
To
On 2016/02/03 14:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> I just did a full 'pkg upgrade' on my FBSD 9.3R box, which installed the
> newest GCC5. I also updated ports. When I used the pkg-provided GCC5, it
> doesn't have graphite support enabled, so no auto-parallelization. When
> I checked the port w/
On 02/03/16 08:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
make showconfig shows the configuration at your *local* portstree. It
does not affect or display the settings of pkg.
To
On 02/03/16 08:40, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 02/03/16 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I just did a full 'pkg upgrade' on my FBSD 9.3R box, which installed the
newest GCC5. I also updated ports. When I used the pkg-provided GCC5, it
doesn't have graphite support enabled, so no auto-paralleliza
On 03.02.2016 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled.
make showconfig shows the configuration at your *local* portstree. It
does not affect or display the settings of pkg.
To check the configuration of "pkg-ports" perform
On 02/03/16 15:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>
>
> I just did a full 'pkg upgrade' on my FBSD 9.3R box, which installed the
> newest GCC5. I also updated ports. When I used the pkg-provided GCC5, it
> doesn't have graphite support enabled, so no auto-parallelization. When
> I checked the por
I just did a full 'pkg upgrade' on my FBSD 9.3R box, which installed the
newest GCC5. I also updated ports. When I used the pkg-provided GCC5, it
doesn't have graphite support enabled, so no auto-parallelization. When
I checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled. I am
rec
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
21 matches
Mail list logo
