On 09/09/2015 07:07, Ben Woods wrote:
> On 9 September 2015 at 07:00, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
>> On 09/09/2015 06:44, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extracted
>>> in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones untouched.
>> But I want the other
On 9 September 2015 at 07:00, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 06:44, Don Lewis wrote:
>> If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extracted
>> in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones untouched.
> But I want the other one to properly extract and compile. Does t
On 09/09/2015 06:44, Don Lewis wrote:
> If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extracted
> in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones untouched.
But I want the other one to properly extract and compile. Does that mean
I'd have to write my own extract: step?
sign
On 9 Sep, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 00:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
>> I think EXTRACT_ONLY will do the equivalent of what you need.
>>
>>
>> From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org] on
>> behalf of Piotr Ku
On 09/09/2015 00:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> I think EXTRACT_ONLY will do the equivalent of what you need.
>
>
> From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org] on
> behalf of Piotr Kubaj [pku...@riseup.net]
> Sent: Tuesd
I think EXTRACT_ONLY will do the equivalent of what you need.
From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org] on
behalf of Piotr Kubaj [pku...@riseup.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:44 PM
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subje
I've been working on a port update and happened to notice that when I
installed an updated package the entries under the Applications menu on
my desktop were not getting updated.
Looking at /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/desktop-file-utils.mk, I see that it adds
"@desktop-file-utils" to PLIST_FILES, and I do
I'm a maintainer of a few ports. For the next update I'm preparing, I
want to make it possible to download some addons via options. The thing
is, they are downloaded as-is. They are not meant to be extracted
(although they are zips), since it's the program itself that manages it.
Is there such a po
Citerar Mike Clarke :
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200
Jimmy Renner wrote:
I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a
bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much
is updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No
complaints,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:45:34PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote:
> >> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit
> >> over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not m
On 08/09/15 14:45, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote:
I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit
over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is
updated. This has been the
On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote:
>> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit
>> over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is
>> updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200
Jimmy Renner wrote:
> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a
> bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much
> is updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No
> complaints, I was just wo
On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote:
> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit
> over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is
> updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No complaints,
> I was just wondering if I have done
Hi,
I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a
bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much
is updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No
complaints, I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-)
Cheers, Jimmy
16 matches
Mail list logo
