On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:45:34PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote: > >> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit > >> over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is > >> updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No complaints, > >> I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) > > > > You haven't done anything wrong. You're just using the quarterly > > package branch, which is a change in the defaults since 10.1-RELEASE. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Matthew > > > > > > Do you know if this was -announce'd to users? > > If not, there's no such thing as too much communication.
This is not a portmgr concern, but a re@ concern and yes it has been announced as it is in the release note. Bapt
pgpUvA1623r10.pgp
Description: PGP signature
