Re: cannot find -legacy error building /usr/lib32 with FreeBSD 10.1-RC3

2014-11-02 Thread andrew clarke
On Thu 2014-10-23 22:45:52 UTC+1100, andrew clarke (m...@ozzmosis.com) wrote: > My intention was to build virtualbox-ose-additions-4.3.18 from ports... > > # uname -a > FreeBSD vbox-freebsd10 10.1-RC3 FreeBSD 10.1-RC3 #0 r273437: Tue Oct 21 > 23:55:15 UTC 2014 > r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr

Re: why is 'make' installing?

2014-11-02 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Sun, November 2, 2014 7:20 pm, Freddie Cash wrote: > It's installing into the staing directory in order to create the binary > package that actually gets installed. More the full install path. > > This is the STAGING work that went on this year. > On Nov 2, 2014 7:02 PM, "Waitman Gobble" wrote

Re: why is 'make' installing?

2014-11-02 Thread Freddie Cash
It's installing into the staing directory in order to create the binary package that actually gets installed. More the full install path. This is the STAGING work that went on this year. On Nov 2, 2014 7:02 PM, "Waitman Gobble" wrote: > > On Sun, November 2, 2014 5:23 pm, Chris H wrote: > > On S

Re: why is 'make' installing?

2014-11-02 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Sun, November 2, 2014 5:23 pm, Chris H wrote: > On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 08:35:33 -0800 "Waitman Gobble" > > wrote > >> Issue, help appreciated. Missed day two of MeetBSD sorry alot going on >> today. Day one was great. >> >> I'm updating a port and noticed that 'make' is actually calling install >>

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-02 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 11/2/14, 10:50 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 18:16:23 + RW wrote: On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:07:23 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:56:21 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files convenient are

Re: why is 'make' installing?

2014-11-02 Thread Chris H
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 08:35:33 -0800 "Waitman Gobble" wrote > Issue, help appreciated. Missed day two of MeetBSD sorry alot going on > today. Day one was great. > > I'm updating a port and noticed that 'make' is actually calling install in > my program Makefile. seems strange. It's not registering

RE: Why is make installing

2014-11-02 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports
I wonder if that has anything with the "child process terminated abnrmally" I saw when starting a "make build" in most any, or a number of, port(s) recently... on another v9 machine. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

why is 'make' installing?

2014-11-02 Thread Waitman Gobble
Issue, help appreciated. Missed day two of MeetBSD sorry alot going on today. Day one was great. I'm updating a port and noticed that 'make' is actually calling install in my program Makefile. seems strange. It's not registering the port as installed but the compiled binary is going into /usr/loca

audio/jack: Wrong file names

2014-11-02 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, I am in the process of rebuilding all of my ports. When I try to rebuild /usr/ports/audio/jack, I run into a problem. This is the error message I have got: ===> Registering installation for jackit-0.124.1 pkg-static: lstat(/usr/home/PORTS/work/usr/ports/audio/jack/work/stage/usr/local/shar

Re: powerpc64 vs. Mesa-10.3.2: .libs/libmesa.a(builtin_functions.o)(.text+???): sibling call optimization to `_???' (various) does not allow automatic multiple TOCs

2014-11-02 Thread Mark Millard
Thanks much. It may be a while before I get back to try this: I'm trying to build a powerpc64/GENERIC64 11.0 kernel variant for an experiment for someone and the PowerMac is busy doing that right now. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net On Nov 2, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Koop Mast wrote: > Can

Re: powerpc64 vs. Mesa-10.3.2: .libs/libmesa.a(builtin_functions.o)(.text+???): sibling call optimization to `_???' (various) does not allow automatic multiple TOCs

2014-11-02 Thread Koop Mast
On 2-11-2014 21:09, Mark Millard wrote: Context: powerpc64/GENERIC64 variant. I list the details at the end of this note, including for "svnlite info /usr/ports" but it is recently svnlite update'd. graphics/dri complained a lot about "automatic multiple TOCs" and reported needing to recompile

Re: RE: reducing the size of the ports tree

2014-11-02 Thread Chris H
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 03:32:16 -0700 Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote > Not initially welcoming this new effort... > explanation and other PKG problems taking precedence... > > > I've a few scripts which use the smaller files, and have used them > extensively in pipes. Syntax within the M

Re: SSP now default for ports/packages, ssp/new_xorg repository EOL

2014-11-02 Thread olli hauer
On 2014-11-02 21:01, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Ports and Package users, > > Ports now have SSP enabled by default. The package repository will now build > SSP by default as well. SSP is "Stack Smashing Protection" and can be read > about at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection.

Re: www/dansguardian revival?

2014-11-02 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:55:47 -0700 Nick Rogers wrote > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Chris H wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:39:30 +0200 Marko Cupać > > wrote > > > > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:47:19 -0700 > > > "Chris H" wrote: > > > > > > > Unless theirs any objection. I'll take it. I'

powerpc64 vs. Mesa-10.3.2: .libs/libmesa.a(builtin_functions.o)(.text+???): sibling call optimization to `_???' (various) does not allow automatic multiple TOCs

2014-11-02 Thread Mark Millard
Context: powerpc64/GENERIC64 variant. I list the details at the end of this note, including for "svnlite info /usr/ports" but it is recently svnlite update'd. graphics/dri complained a lot about "automatic multiple TOCs" and reported needing to recompile with -minimal-toc or -fno-optimize-sibli

SSP now default for ports/packages, ssp/new_xorg repository EOL

2014-11-02 Thread Bryan Drewery
Ports and Package users, Ports now have SSP enabled by default. The package repository will now build SSP by default as well. SSP is "Stack Smashing Protection" and can be read about at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection. This only applies to the head (/latest) packages,

Re: Moved ports not being handled

2014-11-02 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Recently, portmaster kept wanting to upgrade these three ports: graphics/libcdr01 graphics/libfreehand print/libmspub01 Seeing this again with textproc/libmwaw. The new version is installed, but the old version remains. I've seen similar issues. This

Re: devel/tex-web2c not found

2014-11-02 Thread Hiroki Sato
Erich Dollansky wrote in <20141102112717.69653...@x220.alogt.com>: er> Hi, er> er> when I try to compile tex-web2c, I will get this: er> er> configure: You requested to build `web2c' using an installed er> `kpathsea' version, configure: which requires to locate the er> header file. configu

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-02 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 18:16:23 + RW wrote: > On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:07:23 +0100 > Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:56:21 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin >> wrote: >>> tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files >>> files convenient are taking a lot of space for "free

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-02 Thread Jos Backus
How about using SQLite to store this metadata? Jos ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-02 Thread RW
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:07:23 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:56:21 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files > > files convenient are taking a lot of space for "free", we can > > reduce the size of t

Re: Moved ports not being handled

2014-11-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > Recently, portmaster kept wanting to upgrade these three ports: > > > > graphics/libcdr01 > > graphics/libfreehand > > print/libmspub01 > Seeing this again with textproc/libmwaw. The new version is installed, > but the old version remains. I've seen similar issues. This is my solution:

Re: Moved ports not being handled

2014-11-02 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Warren Block wrote: Recently, portmaster kept wanting to upgrade these three ports: graphics/libcdr01 graphics/libfreehand print/libmspub01 It succeeded in rebuilding them every time, but always saw them as needing to be upgraded. Checking the output showed this: ===