FreeBSD Port: anjuta-2.32.1.1_13

2014-08-25 Thread Dave Babb
Good Evening, I am emailing you to ask for assistance with a specific problem I'm having with Anjuta under FreeBSD. The forum post is: Ref: https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=47773 It runs fine under Linux (in a VM).But I am a FreeBSD user, and it is under FreeBSD that I am havi

[QAT] 366063: 4x fail, 1x finished, 3x success

2014-08-25 Thread Ports-QAT
Move picosat and py-pycosat from devel -> math - Remove from devel/Makefile - Add to math/Makefile - Update CATEGORIES for both ports - Add MOVED entries While I'm here, sort MOVED entries causing MOVEDlint.awk error [1] after r365599 [2] [1] 6470: date going backwards from 2014-08-20 to 2014-08

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-25 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 25.08.2014 um 07:57 schrieb Scot Hetzel: [...] > I was also thinking that we should make WITH_BDB_HIGHEST the default. > It is used by VER+ when multiple versions of bdb are installed. That > way we can remove this variable also. I filed two Bugzilla bugs, 193000 and 193002 to keep track of

[QAT] 366054: 4x ignored: is marked as broken: does not compile, 4x leftovers, 4x ignored: is marked as broken: installation is intentionally broken, 12x success

2014-08-25 Thread Ports-QAT
Reset maintainership on nonstaged ports With hat: portmgr - Build ID: 20140825102200-7858 Job owner: b...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 14 hours Enddate: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:04:38 GMT

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-25 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 24.08.2014 um 01:06 schrieb Peter Jeremy: > On 2014-Aug-21 20:56:47 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: >> The time has now come to remove these db4* ports, Berkeley DB versions >> 4.0 to 4.7, inclusively. Most of their dependent ports can cope with >> upgrades to db48, db5, or db6, most of the othe

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread John Marino
On 8/25/2014 21:39, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi John, > > It seems to me that this might have been better just put in as an update > to www/sams. Both the new maintainer and upstream wanted it called www/sams2 and did not want it to use the same portname. > > Zlopi, please would you try out sams2 an

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread Chris Rees
Hi John, It seems to me that this might have been better just put in as an update to www/sams. Zlopi, please would you try out sams2 and let us know if it just works the same? That could render this whole discussion pointless! Chris On 25 August 2014 19:56:11 BST, zlopi wrote: >It makes me

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread zlopi
It makes me sad to look at how changes in recent years FreeBSD - not for the better. New packages - it's good. But! Stable packages replaced by new unstable version - this is wrong. Thanks for taking your time on me. 2014-08-25 21:26 GMT+04:00 John Marino : > On 8/25/2014 19:18, Jim Ohlstein wrot

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, On 8/25/14, 12:43 PM, John Marino wrote: On 8/25/2014 18:40, zlopi wrote: many of my friends use sams 1.0.5 (www / sams) - but not so long ago it was deleted. Previously stated that it requires php 4 - because of what was deleted. I tested to optimize it for php 5.4 and mysql 5.5. Theref

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread John Marino
On 8/25/2014 19:18, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > Not for nothing, but since PHP 5.3 is still in the ports tree, then why > delete ports that depend on it? I know PHP 5.3 has now reached EOL, but > there is probably still a fair amount of legacy code which breaks with > PHP 5.4. I'm not advocating using it

RE: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1

2014-08-25 Thread Sebastian Bach
-Original Message- From: Kubilay Kocak [mailto:koobs.free...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kubilay Kocak Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 5:14 PM To: Sebastian Bach Cc: Michael Gmelin; po...@freebsd.org; w...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1 On 26/08/2014 1:02 AM, Kubilay Kocak wr

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread John Marino
On 8/25/2014 19:10, John Marino wrote: > On 8/25/2014 19:06, zlopi wrote: >> Are you sure that it works properly? >> As far as I know sams2 and did not releases. >> Is for developers. >> >> ===> Installing for sams2-2.0.0 >> ===> Checking if sams2 already installed >> ===> Registering installat

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread John Marino
On 8/25/2014 19:06, zlopi wrote: > Are you sure that it works properly? > As far as I know sams2 and did not releases. > Is for developers. > > ===> Installing for sams2-2.0.0 > ===> Checking if sams2 already installed > ===> Registering installation for sams2-2.0.0 > pkg-static: lstat(/usr/po

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-25 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Matthias Andree wrote: > On 25. August 2014 07:57:36 MESZ, Scot Hetzel wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Michael Gmelin >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:59:37 -0500 >>> Scot Hetzel wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM,

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread zlopi
Are you sure that it works properly? As far as I know sams2 and did not releases. Is for developers. ===> Installing for sams2-2.0.0 ===> Checking if sams2 already installed ===> Registering installation for sams2-2.0.0 pkg-static: lstat(/usr/ports/www/sams2/work/stage/usr/local/comment@sample

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread John Marino
On 8/25/2014 18:40, zlopi wrote: > many of my friends use sams 1.0.5 (www / sams) - but not so long > ago it was deleted. Previously stated that it requires php 4 - because > of what was deleted. I tested to optimize it for php 5.4 and mysql > 5.5. Therefore I would like to get it back - if it is p

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread zlopi
I and many of my friends use sams 1.0.5 (www / sams) - but not so long ago it was deleted. Previously stated that it requires php 4 - because of what was deleted. I tested to optimize it for php 5.4 and mysql 5.5. Therefore I would like to get it back - if it is possible. __

RE: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1

2014-08-25 Thread Sebastian Bach
Hello Michael, I've checked out git 2.0.1 / revision 362475 from the FreeBSD repository and was able to install it. Our Atlassian Stash is running again. :) Best regards Sebastian -Original Message- From: Michael Gmelin [mailto:free...@grem.de] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 4:52 PM To

Re: question about "pkg install"

2014-08-25 Thread Chris Rees
On 08/23/14 09:14, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 23/08/2014 08:40, Kurt Jaeger wrote: I have a program (several, actually) I need to install from the generic package repository. These programs depend on openldap-client; however I have openldap-sasl-client installed. In my experience the t

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread John Marino
On 8/25/2014 17:55, Chris Rees wrote: > On 08/25/14 14:56, zlopi wrote: >> Hi >> >> Bring to your attention the correct port www / sams that has all the >> necessary corrections for its work. >> >> Check and send to the ports. Thank you. >> > > Hello-- did you mean to send a patch? > I suspect

Re: Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread Chris Rees
On 08/25/14 14:56, zlopi wrote: Hi Bring to your attention the correct port www / sams that has all the necessary corrections for its work. Check and send to the ports. Thank you. Hello-- did you mean to send a patch? Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous conten

Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1

2014-08-25 Thread Chris Rees
On 08/25/14 16:14, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 26/08/2014 1:02 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 26/08/2014 12:52 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:39:50 + Sebastian Bach wrote: Hi! I've an urgent problem with the current port devel/git (2.0.2). After upgrading we can't use our A

Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1

2014-08-25 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 26/08/2014 1:02 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 26/08/2014 12:52 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:39:50 + >> Sebastian Bach wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I've an urgent problem with the current port devel/git (2.0.2). After >>> upgrading we can't use our Atlassian Stash server

Re: Berkeley DB 4 and portupgrade

2014-08-25 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 23.08.2014 um 16:10 schrieb RW: > > > I've lost track of how portupgrade works these days (10.0). Has it > switched to using pkg's sqlite database? For portupgrade, do not worry - it only _caches_ data in Berkeley DB databases, it does not exclusively own valuable data that it could lose. (O

Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1

2014-08-25 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 26/08/2014 12:52 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:39:50 + > Sebastian Bach wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I've an urgent problem with the current port devel/git (2.0.2). After >> upgrading we can't use our Atlassian Stash server anymore. Stash >> rejects (hard check of 2.0.2 and

Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:39:50 + Sebastian Bach wrote: > Hi! > > I've an urgent problem with the current port devel/git (2.0.2). After > upgrading we can't use our Atlassian Stash server anymore. Stash > rejects (hard check of 2.0.2 and 2.0.3) to use this specific git > version due to a criti

Re: Does www/chromium work?

2014-08-25 Thread Stefan Bethke
If anyone's wondering what the fix for Chromium (chromium-36.0.1985.143_1) on FreeBSD 9 (stable) is: If you get this error: $ chrome /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required by /usr/local/share/chromium/chrome not found Add this at the end of /etc/libmap.conf: [/usr/local/share/

Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1

2014-08-25 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 25/08/2014 11:39 PM, Sebastian Bach wrote: > Hi! > > I've an urgent problem with the current port devel/git (2.0.2). After > upgrading we can't use our Atlassian Stash server anymore. Stash rejects > (hard check of 2.0.2 and 2.0.3) to use this specific git version due to a > critical bug in

Return ports www/sams

2014-08-25 Thread zlopi
Hi Bring to your attention the correct port www / sams that has all the necessary corrections for its work. Check and send to the ports. Thank you. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To un

FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.2_1

2014-08-25 Thread Sebastian Bach
Hi! I've an urgent problem with the current port devel/git (2.0.2). After upgrading we can't use our Atlassian Stash server anymore. Stash rejects (hard check of 2.0.2 and 2.0.3) to use this specific git version due to a critical bug in 'git diff-tree' which breaks Stash's commit page. Please

[QAT] 365835: 4x leftovers

2014-08-25 Thread Ports-QAT
Stage databases/gnats4 and assign new maintainer PR: 192881 Submitted by: Chris Hutchinson I am sure many people wanted to see this port die, but Chris wanted to save it. Unfortunately his PR only contained about 2% of the work needed to properly stage it. I had to overhaul it wit

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-08-25 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Gmelin
>> On 25 Aug 2014, at 12:00, Matthias Andree wrote: >> >> On 24. August 2014 15:36:18 MESZ, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200 >> olli hauer wrote: >> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote: On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200 Kurt Jaeger

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-25 Thread Matthias Andree
On 25. August 2014 07:57:36 MESZ, Scot Hetzel wrote: >On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Michael Gmelin >wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:59:37 -0500 >> Scot Hetzel wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Gmelin >>> wrote: >>> > @Olli: Checking Mk/bsd.databasemk it seems lik

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-25 Thread Matthias Andree
On 24. August 2014 16:46:17 MESZ, Dennis Glatting wrote: >On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 15:08 +0200, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200 >> > Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> > >> >> Hi! >> >> >> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wr

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-25 Thread Matthias Andree
On 24. August 2014 21:55:40 MESZ, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >Hi! > >There is the possible mechanism of > >WITH_BDB_VER=6 > >in /etc/make.conf. > >Is there a way to also add some > >DEFAULT_VERSIONS= bdb=6 > >like syntax in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk to keep the >mechanism similar to other "def

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

2014-08-25 Thread Matthias Andree
On 24. August 2014 15:36:18 MESZ, Michael Gmelin wrote: >On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200 >olli hauer wrote: > >> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200 >> > Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> > >> >> Hi! >> >> >> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks