On 05/10/2014 08:48 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On 11 May 2014 03:33, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> [...]
>> So we will be DEPRECATING and resetting maintainer on all unstaged ports
>> on June 31st.
>>
>> These ports will be set to EXPIRE on August 31st and will then be
>> removed from the tree. They will
On 11 May 2014 03:33, Bryan Drewery wrote:
[...]
> So we will be DEPRECATING and resetting maintainer on all unstaged ports
> on June 31st.
>
> These ports will be set to EXPIRE on August 31st and will then be
> removed from the tree. They will not be restored unless someone stages
> them as well.
Upgrade to new upstream bugfix release 2.1.18-1.
Changes: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-announce/2014-May/000195.html
-
Build ID: 20140510232200-57179
Job owner: mand...@freebsd.org
Buildtime:
- Chase revision r353615 to math/qhull5.
-
Build ID: 20140510215601-4
Job owner: step...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 78 minutes
Enddate: Sat, 10 May 2014 23:13:52 GMT
Revision:
> > As a work-around it may be possible to install the devel/bmake port and
> > use it for port management.
> Yes this should work. Install devel/bmake, then use 'bmake' instead of
> 'make' when interacting with the ports tree. Or install devel/fmake and
> use 'fmake'. Either works.
Or download 8
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 5/10/2014 10:33 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
You can see the full list here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/notstaged.txt
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports
On Sat, 10 May 2014 20:22:39 + Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> I am trying to get the libtool changes to work with the port
> graphics/opendx. I made the changes:
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> --- Makefile(revision 353598)
>
On 05/10/2014 03:22 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> I am trying to get the libtool changes to work with the port
> graphics/opendx.
> ..
> When I do "find . -name "libDX.*"", I get
> ./work/dx-4.4.4/src/exec/.libs/libDX.lai
> ./work/dx-4.4.4/src/exec/.libs/libDX.a
> ./work/
- Chase revision 353604 to graphics/plotutils.
See:http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=353604
-
Build ID: 20140510211800-8991
Job owner: step...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 43 minu
On May 10, 2014 10:34 AM, "Bryan Drewery" wrote:
>
> You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
>
> In September 2013, the Ports framework learned how to Stage ports.
>
> On June 31st, all unstaged ports will be marked DEPRECATED and have
> their MAINTAINER reset.
>
El día Saturday, May 10, 2014 a las 01:18:31PM -0700, Thomas Mueller escribió:
> from Bryan Drewery:
>
> > You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
>
> > In September 2013, the Ports framework learned how to Stage ports.
>
> > On June 31st, all unstaged ports w
I am trying to get the libtool changes to work with the port
graphics/opendx. I made the changes:
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile(revision 353598)
+++ Makefile(working copy)
@@ -16,10 +16,11 @@
cdf:${PORTSDIR
from Bryan Drewery:
> You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
> In September 2013, the Ports framework learned how to Stage ports.
> On June 31st, all unstaged ports will be marked DEPRECATED and have
> their MAINTAINER reset.
> On August 31st, all unstaged por
W dniu 2014-05-10 17:47, Bryan Drewery pisze:
>> You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
>>
>
> You can see the full list here:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/notstaged.txt
For mail/postfixadmin I've send PR [1] including staging and security
fix some tim
Reset more maintainers:
: host hub.freebsd.org[8.8.178.136] said: 550 5.1.1
: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local
: host mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de[141.44.21.48] said:
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO
: host srv-eml-pmva-02.fh-mainz.de[143.93.114.189] said:
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On June 31st, all unstaged ports will be marked DEPRECATED and have
their MAINTAINER reset.
On August 31st, all unstaged ports will be removed from the ports tree.
I take it deprecation is June 30th and not July 31st (giving that June
31st doesn't exis
Reset a few maintainers
: host in1-smtp.messagingengine.com[66.111.4.72]
said: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected:
User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
: host ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com[74.125.131.26] said:
550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach
Hi Crees,
Thanks. Let me dig a new solution.
BR,
Muhammad
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> Hi Muhammad,
>
> On 04/05/2014 15:09, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> > Hi Dirk,
> >
> > How can I enforce it from inside a ports Makefile?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
>
> Short a
El día Saturday, May 10, 2014 a las 10:47:42AM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió:
> On 5/10/2014 10:33 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
> >
>
> You can see the full list here:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/notstaged.txt
B
> On 5/10/2014 10:33 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
> You can see the full list here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/notstaged.txt
Hi,
Suggestion: a CGI script with approx.:
cd /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports
find
On May 10, 2014, at 5:47 AM, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
> Ok, nice to know this. As I understand, iXsystems now fully moved to Samba
> 4.1?
>
> I those thinking, guys, that you may wanted to create at the top of FreeNAS
> Samba4 appliance, similar to the one, provided by SerNet, only FreeBSD bas
On 5/10/2014 10:33 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
>
You can see the full list here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/notstaged.txt
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Muhammad,
On 04/05/2014 15:09, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> How can I enforce it from inside a ports Makefile?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
Short answer, you can't, sorry.
You'll need to test it somehow in a target;
pre-configure:
if ! openssl --help 2>&1 | grep -q 377
You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
In September 2013, the Ports framework learned how to Stage ports.
On June 31st, all unstaged ports will be marked DEPRECATED and have
their MAINTAINER reset.
On August 31st, all unstaged ports will be removed from the por
On 05/10/2014 05:47, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
>
> Ok, nice to know this. As I understand, iXsystems now fully moved to
> Samba 4.1?
>
Yes.
> I those thinking, guys, that you may wanted to create at the top of
> FreeNAS Samba4 appliance, similar to the one, provided by SerNet, only
> FreeBSD ba
On 08/05/2014 17:08, Chris Ross wrote:
>
> I am looking to try putting a DLNA server on a FreeBSD 9 sparc64
> box. As Plex seems to be amd64 only, I’m looking now at minidlna.
> I see that ports has version 1.1.1, but 1.1.2 was released a couple
> months ago.
>
> Is there any problem with 1.1.2,
On 5/9/2014 7:24 AM, Gyrd Thane Lange wrote:
> Den 09. mai 2014 14:01, skrev Steven Hartland:
>> Since the following commit ports is now broken on 8.3 and earlier.
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=352986
>>
>> Now while 8.3 is now officially EOL as of 9 days ago such a
>> b
On 10/05/2014 14:29, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
> A quick question if I may: in a setup using Portmaster and pkg, is there
> any way (some kind of "pkg query" perhaps?) to obtain a list of which
> currently installed ports are build-only dependencies?
pkg(8) only deals with run-time dependencie
Hi there,
A quick question if I may: in a setup using Portmaster and pkg, is there
any way (some kind of "pkg query" perhaps?) to obtain a list of which
currently installed ports are build-only dependencies?
Thanks in advance,
AvW
--
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
> On 05/08/14 15:10, John Hixson wrote:
>
>>
>> So, fix what ?
>> We were seeing that smbd was not dumping core. It would claim to be
>> dumping
>> core but wasn't. It appears this is completely unrelated. The issue
>> turns out to be the ke
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
31 matches
Mail list logo
