On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:03:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 04:28:16PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > My understanding is that one of the benefits of the new OPTIONS
> > framework is that it's supposed to take make.conf knobs into account
> > when displaying the opt
Hello.
I wish we could use FreeBSD as basic platform, but it is not possible.
We met several problems which led to mass migration to Debian.
First of all, hardware support. EMC multipath was not supported by
FreeBSD 8, and it was a necessary thing in our environment. We tried to
use custom patc
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 11:12:17PM -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from Doug Barton :
>
> > My understanding is that one of the benefits of the new OPTIONS
> > framework is that it's supposed to take make.conf knobs into account
> > when displaying the options dialog.
>
> > I have WITHOUT_NLS defi
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 04:28:16PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> My understanding is that one of the benefits of the new OPTIONS
> framework is that it's supposed to take make.conf knobs into account
> when displaying the options dialog.
yes it is if you use the new way of setting KNOBS aka a genera
Hello.
On 06/01/2012 19:07, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
If you do your experiments using scripts instead of in interactive mode,
they should work in 8.x as well as in 9.x.
Thank you for clarification. Yes, it works as expected in scripts on 8.3
and 7.4:
> cat 1.sh
#!/bin/sh
false & pid=$!
ech
During the png- upgrade I now hit another obstacle.
What can I do to remedy it?
Thanks
/Leslie
devel/qt4-makeqpf:make reinstall
===> Patching for qt4-makeqpf-4.8.2
===> Applying extra patch
/usr/ports/devel/qt4-makeqpf/../../devel/qt4/files/patch-configure
Ignoring previously applied (
2012-06-03 18:26, Kevin Oberman skrev:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:23 AM, b. f. wrote:
Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3.
removed manually, if portmaster hasn't already done so. Here it looks
like your new build of kde3libs is sloppily linking against the old
version of kde3libs that you still
On 6/4/2012 4:23, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On 03 June 2012 PM 11:41:12 Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/3/2012 19:19, Erich Dollansky wrote:
do a simple thing. Install a naked 8.3, 9.0 or 10.0 on a fresh hard disk. Get
then the ports tree and start compiling X.
I did not get a running system since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Erich,
On 06/03/2012 08:50 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03 June 2012 PM 7:54:46 Janketh Jay wrote:
>>> a person who operated Windows for some years does not see
>>> him/herself as a newcomer but still fails on FreeBSD. The word
>
from Doug Barton :
> My understanding is that one of the benefits of the new OPTIONS
> framework is that it's supposed to take make.conf knobs into account
> when displaying the options dialog.
> I have WITHOUT_NLS defined in make.conf, but when I started an upgrade
> today for x11-toolkits/libxf
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Oleg Moskalenko
wrote:
> I got reply from libevent guys:
>
> ==
> This is actually an openssl bug that prevents OpenSSL 1.0.1 from
> renegotiating with itself successfully when it has negotiated TLS 1.1 or
> TLS 1.2.
>
> It doesn'
Hi,
On 03 June 2012 PM 7:54:46 Janketh Jay wrote:
> >>
> > a person who operated Windows for some years does not see
> > him/herself as a newcomer but still fails on FreeBSD. The word goes
> > around then that FreeBSD is bad.
> >
> This is fine, actually. As mentioned, it's not intended fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Erich,
On 06/03/2012 06:56 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:33:16 Janketh Jay wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Erich,
>>
>> FreeBSD is in no way intended to be used by computer newcomers.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
On 03 June 2012 PM 5:33:16 Janketh Jay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Erich,
>
> FreeBSD is in no way intended to be used by computer newcomers. If
> they're comfortable with Windows, then they should use it. If someone
> wants to try using FreeBSD and
My understanding is that one of the benefits of the new OPTIONS
framework is that it's supposed to take make.conf knobs into account
when displaying the options dialog.
I have WITHOUT_NLS defined in make.conf, but when I started an upgrade
today for x11-toolkits/libxfce4gui the dialog came up with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Erich,
FreeBSD is in no way intended to be used by computer newcomers. If
they're comfortable with Windows, then they should use it. If someone
wants to try using FreeBSD and runs into issues, that is what the
forums, mailing lists, FreeBSD
On 4-6-2012 0:20, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> optionsng should have been 100% upward compatible. you should not be
> forced to an an emergency update of a port you maintain just because the
> ports tree broke things.
This has always been broken. It's just exposed by Roland cause he's
/adding/ an
I got reply from libevent guys:
==
This is actually an openssl bug that prevents OpenSSL 1.0.1 from
renegotiating with itself successfully when it has negotiated TLS 1.1 or
TLS 1.2.
It doesn't seem to have an OpenSSL ticket yet; we only figured it out
yesterday
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: hs-yesod-core-0.9.4.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/hs-data-object
make_index: hs-yesod-core-0.9.4.1: no entry for
/usr/ports/devel/hs-data-object-yaml
make_index: hs-yesod-core-0.9.4.1: no entry for /usr/ports/d
On 6/3/12 5:54 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
The real fix which will be long term, any volunteer? would be to define a
PKGNAMEEXTRAPREFIX in bsd.port.mk that bsd.*.mk can overwrite and create a
UNIQUENAME that is independant from that EXTRAPREFIX.
or back all this out until its actually tested
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:01:01PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:20:23PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> > [Please cc me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. I originally asked
> > this
> > on questions@.]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > With the release of the new options fr
Hi,
On 03 June 2012 PM 1:12:38 b. f. wrote:
> > On 03 June 2012 PM 5:42:55 Adam Strohl wrote:
> > > On 6/3/2012 17:24, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> > > I feel like this thread is grossly overstating how often ports are
> > > broken which is super rare in my experience. Proposing a version'd ports
>
Hi,
On 03 June 2012 PM 11:41:12 Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 6/3/2012 19:19, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > do a simple thing. Install a naked 8.3, 9.0 or 10.0 on a fresh hard disk.
> > Get then the ports tree and start compiling X.
> >
> > I did not get a running system since at least 2007 when I did thi
Hi
Libevent is a very important port that is used in many projects (Chromium and
Memcached are among the best known ones).
I installed the latest current version of libevent 2.0.19 (port
devel/libevent2) and it seems like it is broken in regard to OpenSSL
integration (I use the OpenSSL recent p
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:02:39PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Klaus released vdr 1.7.28 and I just prepared an update for our
> vdr ports:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vdr-ports-1.7.28-001.shar
>
> Here is the announce posting:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gman
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:20:23PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> [Please cc me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. I originally asked this
> on questions@.]
>
> Hi,
>
> With the release of the new options framework for ports, I've run into a
> problem trying to convert one of my ports.
>
> Th
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:20:23PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> [Please cc me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. I originally asked this
> on questions@.]
>
> Hi,
>
> With the release of the new options framework for ports, I've run into a
> problem trying to convert one of my ports.
>
> Th
[Please cc me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. I originally asked this
on questions@.]
Hi,
With the release of the new options framework for ports, I've run into a
problem trying to convert one of my ports.
The nature of the problem is that the port seems to ignore the setting stored
in /
Hi,
The new options framework is now in the port for a week, most of the problems
directly concerning the framework seems to have been addressed.
Some issue seems still to be there regarding backward compatibility but I
haven't been able to reproduced any of the one that are supposed to be left.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 04:36:53PM +0100, Florent P. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is Battle for Wesnoth (games/wesnoth) planed to be upgraded to 1.10.3 ?
Yes, I plan to upgrade games/wesnoth to 1.10.3 and mark
games/wesnoth-devel broken soon.
--
Alex
___
freeb
On 6/3/12, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:23 AM, b. f. wrote:
Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3.
>>
>>> removed manually, if portmaster hasn't already done so. Here it looks
>>> like your new build of kde3libs is sloppily linking against the old
>>> version of kde3libs that y
> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:42:55 Adam Strohl wrote:
> > On 6/3/2012 17:24, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> > I feel like this thread is grossly overstating how often ports are
> > broken which is super rare in my experience. Proposing a version'd ports
> > tree seems like a bad-practice-encouraging-solution
On 6/3/2012 19:19, Erich Dollansky wrote:
do a simple thing. Install a naked 8.3, 9.0 or 10.0 on a fresh hard disk. Get
then the ports tree and start compiling X.
I did not get a running system since at least 2007 when I did this. There was
always at least one manual intervention needed.
I di
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:23 AM, b. f. wrote:
>>> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3.
>
>> removed manually, if portmaster hasn't already done so. Here it looks
>> like your new build of kde3libs is sloppily linking against the old
>> version of kde3libs that you still have installed, and which still
Hello,
Is Battle for Wesnoth (games/wesnoth) planed to be upgraded to 1.10.3 ?
Thanks a lot.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@
Kugler Tobias wrote:
> Hi kevlo,
Hi Kugler,
> Can you already foresee when owncloud 4 will be ported to freebsd? There
> seems to be a few improvements which I am keen to use.
I'm working on it. I'll update it this week.
> Many thanks and kind regards,
>
> pbtraveller
Kevin
_
Hi kevlo,
Can you already foresee when owncloud 4 will be ported to freebsd? There seems
to be a few improvements which I am keen to use.
Many thanks and kind regards,
pbtraveller___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Franci Nabalanci wrote:
make failed for science/avogadro
If you need help, I've got his number.
--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
Hi,
On 03 June 2012 PM 5:42:55 Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 6/3/2012 17:24, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> I feel like this thread is grossly overstating how often ports are
> broken which is super rare in my experience. Proposing a version'd ports
> tree seems like a bad-practice-encouraging-solution to
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:14:40AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 23:53, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > In fact, many of the weaknesses of SSL systems as currently designed
> > could be obviated by having used OpenPGP as the basis of the system
> > rather than creating this whole PKI system
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 17:27:16 -0400, Daniel Hagerty wrote:
> Most of the git based repositories(*) I know of for the ports
> collection all seem to stop around March 1st, 2012. The one at
> git://git.freebsd.org/freebsd-ports stops in 1996!
>
> Have these been desupported, or is somethin
Continue building ports on FreeBSD 9.0 release with portmaster -r png- and
sopped in science/avogadro:
[60%} Generating moc_selectextension cxx
usr/local/include/boost/type-traits/detail/has_binary_operator.hp.50: Parse
error at "BOOST_JOIN"
*** Error code 1
1 error
*** Error code 2
make fail
On 6/3/2012 17:24, Etienne Robillard wrote:
Technical debt perhaps counts when upstream vendor "new versions" breaks
things unexpectingly ?
For this to happen though that means one of two things:
1. The port maintainer has updated the port to grab this new version,
and tested it (and it worke
On 06/03/2012 06:14 AM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/3/2012 11:14, Erich wrote:
What I really do not understand in this whole discussion is very
simple. Is it just a few people who run into problems like this or is
this simply ignored by the people who set the strategy for FreeBSD?
I mention since y
> > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libpng.so.6, needed by /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so, not
> > found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
> > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by
> > "libcairo.so.2"
> > Command
> > '['/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-intros
>> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3.
> removed manually, if portmaster hasn't already done so. Here it looks
> like your new build of kde3libs is sloppily linking against the old
> version of kde3libs that you still have installed, and which still
Obviously I meant kdelibs3 in the above -- this i
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by
> "libkdefx.so.6"
> /usr/local/bin/moc ./domainbrowser.h -o domainbrowser.moc
> gmake[2]: *** [settings.h] Fel 1
> gmake[2]: *** Inväntar oavslutade jobb...
> gmake[2]: Lämnar katalogen
> "/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdel
On 02/06/2012 23:53, Chad Perrin wrote:
> In fact, many of the weaknesses of SSL systems as currently designed
> could be obviated by having used OpenPGP as the basis of the system
> rather than creating this whole PKI system for the sole purpose of making
> corporate CAs seem "necessary" as imagin
49 matches
Mail list logo
