Re: [sysutils/pwsafe] Useless X11 dependency

Hi, On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:39:21AM +0800, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:47:19PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Pleaese Cc: me when replying, I'm not subscribed. > > > > I'm using sysutils/pwsafe on a headless server. My recent upgrade of > > the po

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On 11/16/2011 05:03, Wietse Venema wrote: > I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not > representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run, > but hey, what do I know. I think you're right that having a network makes the MTA more useful. :) However given the pr

Re: [sysutils/pwsafe] Useless X11 dependency

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:47:19PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi, > > Pleaese Cc: me when replying, I'm not subscribed. > > I'm using sysutils/pwsafe on a headless server. My recent upgrade of > the port pulled in numerous useless X11 libs. > > - The port doesn't seem to agree to issue the

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On 16/11/2011 23:30, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:16:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: [SNIP] It would be immensely helpful if run-time details could be made available including line of source code, and any system configuration details that are necessary to reproduce the condition

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:16:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse: > > Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? > > > > I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that > > it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface > > fixes this, then

Re: cvs checkout ./. csup

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:48:26 +0100 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with > > # cd /usr > # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs > # cvs checkout ports > > and later do the updating just with: > > # cd /usr/ports > # cvs

[sysutils/pwsafe] Useless X11 dependency

Hi, Pleaese Cc: me when replying, I'm not subscribed. I'm using sysutils/pwsafe on a headless server. My recent upgrade of the port pulled in numerous useless X11 libs. - The port doesn't seem to agree to issue the password on the terminal anymore; - The port compiles cleanly when the Makefil

ardour3 beta1 (use a midi keyboard with FreeBSD...)

Hi! I still haven't got around to porting lv2 ui and more plugins (help highly welcome there :) - but after the ardour guys posted a beta1 release of ardour3, http://ardour.org/node/4658 I prepared another port update: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/ardour-3.0beta1-prelimi

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

Wietse: > Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? > > I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that > it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface > fixes this, then we can all move on to more interesting things. On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 16 Nov 2011 16:00, "Wietse Venema" wrote: >> >> Kurt Jaeger: >>> Hi! >>> Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value > (it determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). >>> [...] Postfix does non

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On 16 Nov 2011 16:00, "Wietse Venema" wrote: > > Kurt Jaeger: > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > > > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > > [...] > > > Postfix does none of that. > > > > The fbsd postfix-current p

science/avogadro compile failure

avogadro fails with the error reports shown below. Thanks in advance for any guidance David Scanning dependencies of target avogadro-app [ 90%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/editcommands.cpp.o [ 90%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/pr

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > > > > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > [...] > > Postfix does none of that. > > The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does > something which fails

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On 2011/11/16 14:18, olli hauer wrote: On 2011-11-16 10:28, Pav Lucistnik wrote: On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or hav

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

Hi! > > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [...] > Postfix does none of that. The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does something which fails on a jail-based build-cluster

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On 2011-11-16 10:28, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> >>> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: >>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently differ

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > > [quote > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html] > > > > I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail)

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

Hi! > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [quote http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html] > > > I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where > > > the user

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:28:03 +0100 Pav Lucistnik articulated: > On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > >> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: > >> > >>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or hav

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:28:03AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a > package that will then be redistributed to other machines? > Am I misunderstanding something, or is this a local configuration script that customizes the in

10-CURRENT && ports/net/wireshark does not compile

Hello, /usr/ports is uptodate as of CVS of yesterday, kernel/world are r226986; the above mentioned port does not compile, it gives: # make install ... libtool: compile: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./../.. -I./.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/p11-kit-1 -I/usr/local/ nclude

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? It is a pu

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

on 16/11/2011 10:19 Doug Barton said the following: > On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> It should be >> >> MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg > > Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the > distfile mirror became the

Re: Recent ports removal

On 16/11/2011 08:20, Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/15/2011 11:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: By its > nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port > tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no > PORTR

SOLVED: Re: can't fetch math/mpfr

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:43:24AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> License LGPL3 accepted by the user > => patch02 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//mpfr-3.1.0. > => Attempting to fetch http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-curren

can't fetch math/mpfr

===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License LGPL3 accepted by the user => patch02 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//mpfr-3.1.0. => Attempting to fetch http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/patch02 fetch: transfer timed out => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

On 11/16/2011 00:27, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, "Doug Barton" > wrote: >> >> On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> > It should be >> > >> > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} >> > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg >> >> Um, no. That's not an advant

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, "Doug Barton" wrote: > > On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > It should be > > > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} > > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg > > Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the > distfile mirror became the only wor

Re: Recent ports removal

On 11/15/2011 11:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>> By its nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no PORTREVISION bump happen. > >> portmaster -L will w

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: > It should be > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the distfile mirror became the only working master site by default. Please provide a proper master