On 13 August 2011 01:44, Jesse Smith wrote:
> Here is my third attempt at a port for the Ubuntu One client. I know
> it's not pretty yet. I appreciate the feedback and I'll try to clean it
> up once the port builds & installs properly.
>
> Has anyone had any luck getting this port to install and r
Hi Philip,
please find the FreeBSD ports I am currently working on in support of
creating an Apache Tuscany port here:
-> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/projects/fbsd-ports/
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
wrote:
> Do not make a repo copy for this. www/apache
Here is my third attempt at a port for the Ubuntu One client. I know
it's not pretty yet. I appreciate the feedback and I'll try to clean it
up once the port builds & installs properly.
Has anyone had any luck getting this port to install and run, besides
me?
Thanks everyone,
Jesse
# This is a s
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 21:52:58 +0200, Rainer Schwarze wrote:
> I solved part of my problem. It looks like python is not found during
> jail startup - I'd assume PATH is incorrectly set. When I change my
> moin.fcgi script's shebang line, it works:
Ah, so it _was_ that a file could not be find whe
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
This file is relatively recent; When I used portsnap yesterday, it wasn't
there, and now it is.
I do a postrmaster on a
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
> > This file is relatively recent; When I used portsnap yesterday, it wasn't
> > there, and now it is.
> I do a postrmaster on a nearly daily basis. This occ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.x has been the recommended version of Ruby from the official
Ruby web site www.ruby-lang.org since at least April 2009. Many other
systems are still using Ruby 1.8.x, but I get the impression that many
people are building their own to use
Hi,
I solved part of my problem. It looks like python is not found during
jail startup - I'd assume PATH is incorrectly set. When I change my
moin.fcgi script's shebang line, it works:
moin.fcgi:
#!/usr/local/bin/python
# old:
# !/usr/bin/env python
...
Since it works now, I conclude that env c
On 08/12/11 20:21, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/8/12 Roland Smith:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
This happens on all boxes runni
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:05:24 +0200
Hartmann, O. articulated:
> That was the first I did ... but it doesn't help.
What mirror is the error coming from?
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To heade
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2011/8/12 Roland Smith :
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
> >> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of
On 08/12/11 19:16, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
8.2/9.0) doesn't
matter. What's up with the ports
On 12 August 2011 18:18, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
>
>>Submitter-Id: current-users
>>Originator: Conrad J. Sabatier
>>Organization:
>>Confidential: no
>>Synopsis: Update net-p2p/lopster, unflag as DEPRECATED
>>Severity: non-critical
>>Priority: low
>>Category: ports
>>Clas
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator:Conrad J. Sabatier
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Update net-p2p/lopster, unflag as DEPRECATED
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: ports
>Class: change-request
>Release: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1
2011/8/12 Roland Smith :
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
>> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
>> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
>> matter. What's up with the ports col
Do not make a repo copy for this. www/apache23 is correct, but the
files/ should start out empty. Please co-ordinate with apache@
On 08/11/11 21:12, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Make an www/apache23 port if there isn't one already. In no case would
> putting Apache 2.3 in the www/apache22 port make any
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
> matter. What's up with the ports collection?
Probably nothing.
>
2011/8/12 Polytropon :
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:46:37 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
>> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
>> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
>> matter. What's up with the ports collection?
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:46:37 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
> matter. What's up with the ports collection?
You're using portsnap? Wha
Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
8.2/9.0) doesn't
matter. What's up with the ports collection?
Regards,
Oliver
Extracting new files:
/usr/ports/GIDs
/usr/ports/UIDs
/usr/ports/audio
We use pdftk for shuffling pdfs together and adding watermarks to a pdf with
the stamp command. We've found that if we start with a pdf that's over 2GB in
size, pdftk will give the error below and stop working. Is there any work
around for this or is this a known issue? I've checked the FAQ b
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 01:28:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> I notice that http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156253
> exists for the 1.46.1 update, however 1.47 is out since July 11. I'm
> curious about whatever plans may exist to do the update ...
>
>
> Doug
>
> --
>
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
