Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-18 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 19.01.2011 01:33, schrieb Mark Terribile: > > Olli Hauer, > > I tried to reply to you directly as oha...@freebsd.org and received the > following error. My message (edited a bit) follows the error. > > > > --- > --- : host mx1.gmx.net[213.165.64.102] said: 550-5.7.1 > {mx11

Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-18 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/18/11 15:43, Mark Terribile wrote: >> From: Xin LI >> Subject: Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree > >> On 01/18/11 15:00, Mark Terribile wrote: >> [...] >>> So: How do I upgrade my ports system selectively, >> w

Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-18 Thread Mark Terribile
Olli Hauer, I tried to reply to you directly as oha...@freebsd.org and received the following error. My message (edited a bit) follows the error. --- --- : host mx1.gmx.net[213.165.64.102] said: 550-5.7.1 {mx113} The --- recipient does not accept mails from 'yahoo.com' ov

Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-18 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2011-01-19 00:00, Mark Terribile wrote: > > Hi, > [...] > > If there is a way to do this with portsnap, please tell me how. I've tried > the -I option but it seems to want me to do the extract which (according to > the man page) will wipe out the whole tree. > > Mark Terribile > Pro

Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-18 Thread Mark Terribile
> From: Xin LI > Subject: Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree > On 01/18/11 15:00, Mark Terribile wrote: > [...] > > So: How do I upgrade my ports system selectively, > without wiping out everything? > You can actually portsnap extract a part of the ports > tree.  e.

Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-18 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/18/11 15:00, Mark Terribile wrote: [...] > So: How do I upgrade my ports system selectively, without wiping out > everything? You can actually portsnap extract a part of the ports tree. e.g.: portsnap extract net/openldap24-server

Generate Latest entries?

2011-01-18 Thread Bob Eager
Is there a script around anywhere to regenerate the entries in packages/latest, from those in packages/All? It seems an obvious thing to have, but I don't see one. Don't mind doing it myself, but it'd be a waste of time if I've just mis-Googled/searched and missed it..! ___

Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-18 Thread Mark Terribile
Hi, A while ago I came here with a question and got what seemed like good answers. After a number of distractions, I came back to the matter and discovered that the answers don't seem so good. So let me pose the case again, and if I have misunderstood you, or misunderstood the documentation

Re: www/chromium MAINTAINER, was Re: chromium producing constant hdd access

2011-01-18 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 02:54:23PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > A MAINTAINER who does not maintain is not a maintainer. > Makefile broke in the last month > MAINTAINER rene@ should add a BUILD_DEPENDS or whatever, > else resign & let someone else eg You Thomas become MAINTAINER It has come

Flu-Season Sale. 24-Hour Hand Sanitizer. Save 30% Free Shipping.

2011-01-18 Thread AliMed enews
If you are having trouble viewing this email, [1]click here. 3D"" [2]3D"AliMed [vie=] [3]View on Handheld [for=] [4]Forward to Friend 3D"" [=] [5]Home 3D"" | 3D"" Online Catalog <= img alt="" height="1" src="http://s3.amazonaws.com/pgica/523/sp.gif"; = width="20"

kdelibs4 build failure target proxymodeltestsuite

2011-01-18 Thread David Southwell
canning dependencies of target kcolorutilsdemo Scanning dependencies of target nepomuk-rcgen

devel/libsoup & libsoup-gnome failure md5 issue

2011-01-18 Thread David Southwell
Can anyone cast light on this: GISCAN Soup-2.4.gir Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner", line 43, in from giscanner.scannermain import scanner_main File "/usr/local/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/scannermain.py", line 34, in from giscanner.dump

Update to net/tsocks

2011-01-18 Thread Tom Murphy
Hi, I know this app is rather ancient (last release 23rd October 2002), but I found there's a rather annoying bug where tsocks just won't connect you to the SOCKS server and gives back an error: Error 56 attempting to connect to SOCKS server I found a patch here at this URL which came out

Re: www/chromium MAINTAINER, was Re: chromium producing constant hdd access

2011-01-18 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi Rene, Your mailer is emitting many \xa0 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= wrote: > 2011/1/18 Julian H. Stacey : > > Hi, > > Reference: > >> From:         Mark Linimon > >> Date:         Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:48:50 + > >> Message-id:   <20110118004850.gb17...@lonesome.com> > > > > Mark Linimon

Re: www/chromium MAINTAINER, was Re: chromium producing constant hdd access

2011-01-18 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
> > A MAINTAINER who does not maintain is not a maintainer. > Makefile broke in the last month > MAINTAINER rene@ should add a BUILD_DEPENDS or whatever, > else resign & let someone else eg You Thomas become MAINTAINER > Are you volunteer to maintain ? you have patches that make the latest stable

Re: www/chromium MAINTAINER, was Re: chromium producing constant hdd access

2011-01-18 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Baptiste Daroussin > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:13:40 +0100 > Message-id: Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > A MAINTAINER who does not maintain is not a maintainer. > > Makefile broke in the last month > > MAINTAINER rene@ should add a BUILD_DEPENDS or w

Re: www/chromium MAINTAINER, was Re: chromium producing constant hdd access

2011-01-18 Thread René Ladan
2011/1/18 Julian H. Stacey : > Hi, > Reference: >> From:         Mark Linimon >> Date:         Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:48:50 + >> Message-id:   <20110118004850.gb17...@lonesome.com> > > Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:12:40PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> > rene@ has ignored

Re: www/chromium MAINTAINER, was Re: chromium producing constant hdd access

2011-01-18 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Thomas Abthorpe > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:21:19 -0500 > Message-id: <20110118132119.ga34...@rex.goodking.ca> Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > > --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-E

Re: www/chromium MAINTAINER, was Re: chromium producing constant hdd access

2011-01-18 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:13:19PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, > Reference: > > From: Mark Linimon > > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:48:50 + > > Message-id: <20110118004850.gb17...@lonesome.com> > > Mark Linimon wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:12:40PM

Re: www/chromium MAINTAINER, was Re: chromium producing constant hdd access

2011-01-18 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Mark Linimon > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:48:50 + > Message-id: <20110118004850.gb17...@lonesome.com> Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:12:40PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > rene@ has ignored request to roll back. If rene@ resign