Re: Which DEPENDS if something is just needed during port install

On 06/09/2010 23:12, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Matthias Andree wrote: > >> Am 06.09.2010 07:32, schrieb Dominic Fandrey: >>> What kind of dependency should I define if I just need something >>> for the install target? It's not needed before, not after and >>> not for the package. >>> >>> I u

/usr/ports/math/fftw broken

I cannot compile the port /usr/ports/math/fftw on either FreeBSD 6.4 i386 or FreeBSD 8.1 i386. Some ports such as audio/gramofile require fftw. The error I get when building the fftw port is along these lines: libtool: compile: gcc44 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I./../fftw -I. -O2 -fno-str

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

spamassassin port/package

Any chance this could by default do a sa-update? I have this happen twice now where portupgrade -ap got me a new spamassassin, but spamd wouldn't start until I ran sa-update. Brian === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Datab

Re: [CFT] GNU gdb(1) 7.2 Shell Archive - devel/gdb7

On 09/06/2010 19:53, jhell wrote: > > Hello Ports Users & Porters, > > I have just created a gdb7 port from the existing devel/gdb6. If you > would like to give this a few rounds of testing and ultimately decide if > it either a). needs adjustment or b). should be committed. then I would > greatl

[CFT] GNU gdb(1) 7.2 Shell Archive - devel/gdb7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ports Users & Porters, I have just created a gdb7 port from the existing devel/gdb6. If you would like to give this a few rounds of testing and ultimately decide if it either a). needs adjustment or b). should be committed. then I would greatly

Re: Which DEPENDS if something is just needed during port install

Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 06.09.2010 07:32, schrieb Dominic Fandrey: > > What kind of dependency should I define if I just need something > > for the install target? It's not needed before, not after and > > not for the package. > > > > I used to think it's INSTALL_DEPENDS, but I just found ou

Re: Which DEPENDS if something is just needed during port install

Am 06.09.2010 07:32, schrieb Dominic Fandrey: > What kind of dependency should I define if I just need something > for the install target? It's not needed before, not after and > not for the package. > > I used to think it's INSTALL_DEPENDS, but I just found out, that > doesn't even exist. BUILD_

Re: Testing editors/emacs-devel on 9-CURRENT

Alexey Shuvaev writes: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:52:18AM +0530, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Could some running 9-CURRENT try building a package of editors/emacs-devel >> port (latest version available in the tree) with default OPTIONS ? >> >> Something like: >> >> #v+ >> % scri

Re: Testing editors/emacs-devel on 9-CURRENT

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:52:18AM +0530, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Could some running 9-CURRENT try building a package of editors/emacs-devel > port (latest version available in the tree) with default OPTIONS ? > > Something like: > > #v+ > % script emacs-devel.log sudo make -C /u

Current unassigned ports problem reports

(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

Re: kdehier4 upgrade - Operation not permitted

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Troy wrote: > When trying to install kdehier4, the following errors show up. Any ideas? did you read UPDATING? # rm -rf /usr/local/kde4/share/PolicyKit/policy this fixes the issue -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla ___