Dear all,
This is now under active development again. The new website is
http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home. Could someone be kind enough as
to update this port?
Best,
Quyen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 00:40:43 +0200, Olivier Girard (neuf) wrote:
> got no spare time to work on sympa actualy. My boss as decided that
> this is not an issue for us and prefer me to work on other projects.
> Maybe later this summer when i'm out of office but i really don't
> know.
Olivier has
Hey,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:25:03 -0700
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/20/10 16:46, Jos Backus wrote:
> > Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor
> > a la daemontools.
>
> That's an interesting idea, but until we have someone willing to
> actually do that work we
if
USE_APACHE=13
you can write ap13 you know what APACHE_VERSION will evaluate too.
Its only vague in the case of a '+'
--
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6
Mark Linimon writes:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:36AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
>> Ah, it uses NO_LATEST_LINK. So the answer is `none'. Sorry.
>
> Yeah, but I had to look it up myself.
>
> Do you know of any other examples that are missing either CONFLICTS or
> NO_LATEST_LINK?
>
I'm not sure w
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:36AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> Ah, it uses NO_LATEST_LINK. So the answer is `none'. Sorry.
Yeah, but I had to look it up myself.
Do you know of any other examples that are missing either CONFLICTS or
NO_LATEST_LINK?
mcl
__
Anonymous writes:
> Mark Linimon writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>>> > And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
>>>
>>> No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
>>> portupgrade tool will break.
>>
>> No, they actually handle
Mark Linimon writes:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> > And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
>>
>> No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
>> portupgrade tool will break.
>
> No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_ confusing to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/10 22:06, Anonymous wrote:
> UNIQUENAME = ap${APACHE_VERSION}-${PORTNAME}
>
> and selecting MP4 in www/mod_musicindex it still thinks WITH_MP4 is not
> defined.
I haven't tried this, but thats a much better attempt then the py- version.
"Philip M. Gollucci" writes:
> On 07/21/10 20:30, Christopher Key wrote:
>> On 19/07/2010 21:05, Anonymous wrote:
>>> Christopher Key writes:
>>>
A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below.
>>> ...
If you can suggest which is the
preferred solution, I'll
At present, the interaction between portconf and port options is
somewhat confusing. Firstly, the output of make showconfig and the
defaults displayed by make config are unaffected by anything set in
ports.conf. Secondly, its quite easy to unexpectedly end up having both
WITH_XXX and WITHOUT
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
>
> No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
> portupgrade tool will break.
No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_ confusing to the users, however
(and, if you g
On 21/07/2010 21:34, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/10 20:30, Christopher Key wrote:
On 19/07/2010 21:05, Anonymous wrote:
Christopher Key writes:
A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below.
...
If you can su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/10 20:30, Christopher Key wrote:
> On 19/07/2010 21:05, Anonymous wrote:
>> Christopher Key writes:
>>
>>> A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below.
>> ...
>>> If you can suggest which is the
>>> preferred solutio
On 19/07/2010 21:05, Anonymous wrote:
Christopher Key writes:
A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below.
...
If you can suggest which is the
preferred solution, I'll put together a patch.
I don't know what workaround is preferred but I'd suggest
UNIQUENAME. It's
> 21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA ??:
> > In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
> > one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like
> > GNU
> > projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as prefix.
>
> I
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov writes:
> 21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA пишет:
>> In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
>> one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like GNU
>> projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Douglas Berry wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:45:18 PDT, Doug Barton wrote:
soo ... is the blob that gets added to make.conf after you
install ports-mgmt/portconf in both make.conf files?
Yes.
I'm thinking that packages/Latest/perl is stale. Can you check it?
If it
21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA пишет:
In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like GNU
projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as prefix.
I don't think that prefixi
On 7/21/2010 12:53 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:37:29PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 9:16 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:37:29PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7/21/2010 9:16 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> O
cvs-src writes:
>Good day!
>We now have two ports with name 'hydra' in the tree, one in security
>category, and one in www.
>Both installs file ${PREFIX}/bin/hydra.
>I firstly think about asking for add CONFLICTS line, but then come up
>to ports tree should not have
>t
On 7/21/2010 9:16 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:45:18 PDT, Doug Barton wrote:
> soo ... is the blob that gets added to make.conf after you
> install ports-mgmt/portconf in both make.conf files?
Yes.
> I'm thinking that packages/Latest/perl is stale. Can you check it?
> If it is stale, updating it should do the tri
Sean writes:
>>> The text as its currently exists is a long way from being clear to a
>>> first timer. And I am talking about the new change that just went in.
>>>
>>> "shar `find port_dir` (note the backticks)",
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> "shar $(find port_dir)"
>>
>> This one doesn't work in (t)csh
On 21/07/2010 15:31, Sean wrote:
>
> On 21/07/2010, at 10:56 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> On 21/07/2010 04:40, Joe wrote:
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
> (and easily co
On 21/07/2010, at 10:56 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 21/07/2010 04:40, Joe wrote:
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>>
The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
(and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) a
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >>>
On 7/21/2010 8:20 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if
Good day!
We now have two ports with name 'hydra' in the tree, one in security
category, and one in www.
Both installs file ${PREFIX}/bin/hydra.
I firstly think about asking for add CONFLICTS line, but then come up
to ports tree should not have
two ports with same name.
Wha
On 21/07/2010 04:40, Joe wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>>> The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
>>> (and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) and are often
>>> difficult to distinguish from quotes.
>>>
>>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear port maintainer,
> >>
> >> Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select
> >> WITH_POST
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:42:52 +0200, Robert Huff wrote:
Marco Alberoni writes:
Good morning, is there a plan to upgrade the FreeBSD Opera port
to the latest version (10.60)?
Ask the maintainer. :-)
He already did :). The PR for the port is under evaluation.
Arjan
--
Using Ope
On 7/20/2010 10:07 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select
WITH_POSTGRESQL in the config dialogue for sysutils/bacula-server, it
fails to link:
Linking bac
Marco Alberoni writes:
> Good morning, is there a plan to upgrade the FreeBSD Opera port
> to the latest version (10.60)?
Ask the maintainer. :-)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
Il 07/19/10 12:33, Matthew Seaman ha scritto:
Would it be sensible to make either WITH_POSTGRESQL or WITH_MYSQL the
default options setting for this port rather than WITH_SQLITE? In my
experience for backing up any reasonably sized system, you do need a
fully competent RDBMS for the bacula catal
On 21/07/2010 03:07, Wesley Shields wrote:
> Dan, my initial testing indicates that this allows the port to build.
> I'd appreciate another set of eyeballs on it though. Please let me know
> if you would like me to commit this patch or not.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/bacula-unbreak.diff
>
>>> The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
>>> (and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) and are often
>>> difficult to distinguish from quotes.
>>>
>>> Rather than write "`find port_dir` (note the backticks)", IMO, it is
>>> far easier to write $(fi
Good morning, is there a plan to upgrade the FreeBSD Opera port to the
latest version (10.60)?
Yours sincerely
--
Marco Alberoni
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To un
- Original Message -
From: "Yuri"
No, look at ports-mgmt/portupgrade, it is capable of upgrading ports
in-place quite happily in most cases. With the caveat that there might
be some special steps that need to be taken not covered by port itself.
This usually happens when dependencies s
Hi, this is a problem.
a standalone server should start with
$MOINDEST/server/moin server standalone
I will modify Makefile to fit this changes.
Thanks
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Stephen Morton wrote:
> The current version of the moinmoin port seems to be pretty broken when it
> comes t
lini...@freebsd.org writes:
Hello,
> The PRs are listed below.
>
> PR number: 87397
> PR title: [patch] incorrect use of PAPERSIZE make variable in some
> ports
> category: print
> portname: lpr-wrapper
> submitter: ga...@zahemszky.hu
> arrival dat
Anonymous writes:
> ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
>> Anonymous writes:
>>> ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
>>
>> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146513
> Why do you need to copy license file in post-extract?
I added because
43 matches
Mail list logo
