Re: Don't know how to make /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build....

2009-07-28 Thread Mel Flynn
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:24:27 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > make: don't know how to make > /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build_done.bind96._usr_local. Stop > *** Error code 2 > Someone else had the same problem, and they also chose overwrite-base: > > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists

Don't know how to make /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build....

2009-07-28 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
Hey all, I'm having a problem on multiple systems: With a clean port, in dns/bind96: I get the options screen, I select only "overwrite base" in addition to the defaults:, and after, I get this: make: don't know how to make /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build_done.bind96._usr_local. Stop ***

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > depend on libjpeg. Really, you need to do a portupgrade -rf jpeg to fix > this. I now did this - it has not fixed the problem. gqview for example is still not able to display this image. I do not even have any libjpeg.so.9 on my system (removed my whole lib/compat/pkg

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > No. It's an issue with an incomplete PORTREVISION bump on ports which > > depend on libjpeg. Really, you need to do a portupgrade -rf jpeg to fix > > this. What you must avoid is one port being link

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-07-28 Thread Martin Tournoij
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:00:04 -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > And this is why I think we should have a policy of not changing > maintainer of things based upon mailing list traffic. I know I'm > guilty of doing it in the past but I have come to the conclusion that it > can cause these kinds of probl

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:04:24 +0200 > From: Oliver Lehmann > > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > I did a 'portupgrade -rf jpeg' and rebuilt about 295 ports on all three > > of my systems running Gnome. That seems to have gotten everything happy > > again. (Of course, rebuilding 290+ ports does take

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Oliver Lehmann writes: > Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> I did a 'portupgrade -rf jpeg' and rebuilt about 295 ports on all three >> of my systems running Gnome. That seems to have gotten everything happy >> again. (Of course, rebuilding 290+ ports does take a bit of time.) > > By the way - is there a w

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 28/07/2009 20:35 Joe Marcus Clarke said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 28/07/2009 19:56 Joe Marcus Clarke said the following: >>> No. It's an issue with an incomplete PORTREVISION bump on ports which >>> depend on libjpeg. Really, you need to do a portupgrade -rf jpeg to fix >>> th

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Kevin Oberman wrote: > I did a 'portupgrade -rf jpeg' and rebuilt about 295 ports on all three > of my systems running Gnome. That seems to have gotten everything happy > again. (Of course, rebuilding 290+ ports does take a bit of time.) By the way - is there a way to print out what ports would b

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:05:14 +0300 > From: Andriy Gapon > Sender: owner-freebsd-gn...@freebsd.org > > on 28/07/2009 19:56 Joe Marcus Clarke said the following: > > > > No. It's an issue with an incomplete PORTREVISION bump on ports which > > depend on libjpeg. Really, you need to do a por

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > No. It's an issue with an incomplete PORTREVISION bump on ports which > depend on libjpeg. Really, you need to do a portupgrade -rf jpeg to fix > this. What you must avoid is one port being linked to both jpeg.9 and > .10. When that happens, applications crash trying

Re: Using WITH_OPENSSL_PORT

2009-07-28 Thread Peggy Wilkins
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 2:13 AM, b. f. wrote: >> As the PR advises, switching back to base openssl fixes my problem. > > Well, apparently only part of it.  Unfortunately the openssl framework > in ports doesn't accommodate mixing and matching of base and port > openssl, so while this may allow you

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/07/2009 19:56 Joe Marcus Clarke said the following: >> No. It's an issue with an incomplete PORTREVISION bump on ports which >> depend on libjpeg. Really, you need to do a portupgrade -rf jpeg to fix >> this. What you must avoid is one port being linked to both jpeg.9

Re: updating to ghostscript8-8.64_2 fails

2009-07-28 Thread Steve Randall
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:36:37 -0500 (CDT) Scott Bennett wrote: > I'm running 7-STABLE updated to several hours ago: > > FreeBSD hellas 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #26: Sun Jul 26 02:48:17 CDT > 2009 benn...@hellas:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/hellas i386 > > I also ran portsnap ag

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/07/2009 17:41 Oliver Lehmann said the following: >> Hi, >> >> after updating several ports including gtk20 and jpeg, I noticed, that >> several JPEG files are no longer displayable in gtk applications like >> gqview or my xfce (Desktop background). >> It worked fine befo

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 28/07/2009 19:56 Joe Marcus Clarke said the following: > > No. It's an issue with an incomplete PORTREVISION bump on ports which > depend on libjpeg. Really, you need to do a portupgrade -rf jpeg to fix > this. What you must avoid is one port being linked to both jpeg.9 and > .10. When that

Re: updating to ghostscript8-8.64_2 fails

2009-07-28 Thread Doug Barton
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Scott Bennett wrote: I finally got around it by putting a +IGNOREME file into /var/db/pkg/ghostscript8-8.64_2/ after the following attempts to skip it using the -x option for portmaster failed to do that. portmaster -x print/ghostscript8 -v -w -a portmas

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 28/07/2009 17:41 Oliver Lehmann said the following: > Hi, > > after updating several ports including gtk20 and jpeg, I noticed, that > several JPEG files are no longer displayable in gtk applications like > gqview or my xfce (Desktop background). > It worked fine before and I can still open it

INDEX now builds successfully on 8.x

2009-07-28 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: "ghost" ports CFLAGS

2009-07-28 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Eric Damien writes: > I edited my /etc/make.conf in order to change the default compiler via > the CC and CXX variables. I also happened to edit the CFLAGS value, > all of this changes enclosed within a conditional check on the > directory, of the form: > .if ${CURDIR:M*/ports*} > CFLAGS= -mtune=

Re: updating to ghostscript8-8.64_2 fails

2009-07-28 Thread Philipp Ost
Scott Bennett wrote: [snipped] In any case, regardless of what the dependency lists say, 8.64-2 is plenty up-to-date enough for everything (or nearly everything) to use, and I haven't had a problem with anything yet that uses it. Yes, that's what I figured out, too. It just bugs me why it

after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

2009-07-28 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi, after updating several ports including gtk20 and jpeg, I noticed, that several JPEG files are no longer displayable in gtk applications like gqview or my xfce (Desktop background). It worked fine before and I can still open it in Gimp, but other GTK applications are not able to display it. It

cups build error needs warning placed into UPDATING

2009-07-28 Thread Scott Bennett
I ran into a problem with the cups update build failing with the following messages. ===> Installing for cups-base-1.3.10_3 ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if print/cups-base already installed if ! pw groupshow cups; then pw groupadd cups -g 193; fi pw: unknown group

Re: updating to ghostscript8-8.64_2 fails

2009-07-28 Thread Scott Bennett
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:05:08 +0200 Philipp Ost wrote: >Scott Bennett wrote: >> I'm running 7-STABLE updated to several hours ago: >> >> FreeBSD hellas 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #26: Sun Jul 26 02:48:17 CDT >> 2009 benn...@hellas:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/hellas i386 >> >>

Re: Which Package is Used for run MAKE command in FreeBSD

2009-07-28 Thread Gergely CZUCZY
Hello, If you're referring to /usr/bin/make, the bsd make, it's part of the base system. That means, it's not in any package. Again, pfsense is NOT FreeBSD, it's built on FreeBSD, such as, a fork of it. If you're seeking help for pfSense i'd suggest checking their mailing lists or support. On Tu

INDEX build failed for 8.x

2009-07-28 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: linux-f10-dbus-glib-0.76: no entry for /compat/linux/lib/libdbus-1.so.3: Committers on the hook: amdmi3 bsam clsung miwi pav skv tob

Re: ports/130218 Maintainer timeout? (lang/ghc update)

2009-07-28 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:13:21PM -0400, L Campbell wrote: > Also sending to @ports because I kind of left the thread hanging. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Damian Gerow wrote: > > Did you get any traction on your bump on a ghc update? ??I can't find your > > message in my history, so it's

Which Package is Used for run MAKE command in FreeBSD

2009-07-28 Thread Nisarg shah
Respected Sir/Madam Actually i am trying to install the .tgz extension file in FreeBSD OS for PFsense firewwall but it is necessary to run MAKE command to install the packages so i dont know which package i have to download to run this MAKE command in my FreeBSD. I hope you help me for this. Tha

"ghost" ports CFLAGS

2009-07-28 Thread Eric Damien
Good morning. I edited my /etc/make.conf in order to change the default compiler via the CC and CXX variables. I also happened to edit the CFLAGS value, all of this changes enclosed within a conditional check on the directory, of the form: .if ${CURDIR:M*/ports*} CFLAGS= -mtune=amdfam10 -msse

FreeBSD Port: dspam-devel-3.8.0_4,1

2009-07-28 Thread Ari Arantes Filho
Hi, I'm new to dspam and want to install it, but I saw the dspam project page the version 3.9-Alpha2. Is there any plan to migrate this new version to the ports? Best regards, Ari ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mai

Re: Dropping maintainership for sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt

2009-07-28 Thread Marius Nünnerich
2009/7/28 Marcin Simonides : > Hello, > > I am the maintainer and author of zfs-snaphot-mgmt port - a crude (and a bit > buggy) script for automatic snapshot creation and removal on ZFS. > Since I am no longer using FreeBSD I cannot keep neither the port nor the > script itself up-to-date. > > If s

Re: graphics/jpeg especially UPDATING

2009-07-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 28/07/2009 04:15 Doug Barton said the following: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Mel Flynn wrote: >> Unfortunately, that can lead to problems as well. I don't have the >> precise >> error anymore, but it is possible for programs to be linked to two >> different >> libjpeg's and fail the assertion that (p

Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2009-07-28 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the li

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2009-07-28 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Dropping maintainership of multimedia/gnome-subtitles

2009-07-28 Thread Marcin Simonides
Hello, I am the maintainer for gnome-subtitles port - a nice subtitle editor written in Mono.NET. Since I am no longer using FreeBSD I cannot keep the port up-to-date (and the application has been updated recently). If someone would like to take over the maintainership, please do so. If you h

Dropping maintainership for sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt

2009-07-28 Thread Marcin Simonides
Hello, I am the maintainer and author of zfs-snaphot-mgmt port - a crude (and a bit buggy) script for automatic snapshot creation and removal on ZFS. Since I am no longer using FreeBSD I cannot keep neither the port nor the script itself up-to-date. If someone, preferably one of the users, wo

Re: cups or HPLIP - overeager notification of syslog messages

2009-07-28 Thread Mel Flynn
On Saturday 25 July 2009 18:51:25 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Message from sysl...@kg-v2 at Jul 26 03:53:53 ... > kg-v2 cupsd: Unable to read configuration file > '/usr/local/etc/cups/cupsd.conf' - exiting! > I haven't seen this problem before, and I have used cups and hplip since > hplip was fiur

nagios 3.1.x request

2009-07-28 Thread Stefan Bethke
Hi, I'm having stability issues with Nagios 3.0.6. Looking at the Nagios download page, I see that there is a 3.1.2 release that appears to have additional fixes. Would it be worthwile to add an additional port, or update the current one to that release? Or should I give nagios-devel a

Re: nagios 3.1.x request

2009-07-28 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 28.07.2009 um 08:44 schrieb Stefan Bethke: I'm having stability issues with Nagios 3.0.6. Looking at the Nagios download page, I see that there is a 3.1.2 release that appears to have additional fixes. Would it be worthwile to add an additional port, or update the current one to that r