As you will have any free time, please, think about creation of port
for Songbird - Mozilla Audio Player.
It may found there:
http://getsongbird.com/
Download (include Linux source):
http://getsongbird.com/download/
Release Notes for last stable version:
http://wiki.songbirdnest.com/Release_Notes/1
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:02 +0100, Remko Lodder wrote:
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-vga:
> > is marked as broken: Needs to be removed
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-via:
> > requires pciVideoPtr typedef
Both of these are dead unmaintain
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> I have to weigh all the screams of 'I want the newest Bash 4.0 *NOW*'
> with testing. I didn't see the issue of $() as my .bashrc and scripts
> are too old and just use ``.
It looks like logcheck-1.2.54 (security/logcheck) also is inco
On March 13, 2009 2:21 pm bin1010 wrote:
> I am trying to make a system work with dansguardian. As I understand
> it, dansguardian has no "binary dependency" on squid or apache. Could
> you make a dansguardian package without these requirements? I will
> install and configure squid myself an
I am trying to make a system work with dansguardian. As I understand
it, dansguardian has no "binary dependency" on squid or apache. Could
you make a dansguardian package without these requirements? I will
install and configure squid myself and I am actually using lighthttp.
Or better yet,
Hi Marcus,
2009/3/13 Marcus von Appen :
> Hi,
>
> it took some time, but finally graphics/blender got a lot of options to
> configure. Those enable users to tweak it to their personal needs and
> hopefully will allow graphics/blender to run on more platforms.
>
> Especially users of non-i386 platf
Hi,
it took some time, but finally graphics/blender got a lot of options to
configure. Those enable users to tweak it to their personal needs and
hopefully will allow graphics/blender to run on more platforms.
Especially users of non-i386 platforms are invited to test the different
options as som
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:59:50AM -0700, GESBBB wrote:
> Until a fix has been put in place, I would suggest that a notice be
> placed in UPDATING that Bash-4 is not completely functional and its use
> is not recommended. Better yet, maybe the port should just be marked
> "BROKEN", since it clearly
Apparantly for the ports to function they need a "pciVideoPtr" typedef. It
does not seem to include this by default, so it's marked as IGNORE so that
it does not get build.
On Fri, March 13, 2009 3:24 pm, David Southwell wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Anyone know what is happening here..:
> Portupgrade produc
Hi
Anyone know what is happening here..:
Portupgrade produces the following:
** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-cyrix:
requires pciVideoPtr typedef
** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-imstt:
requires pciVideoPtr typedef
** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-dri
i had a need to run this port with nagios 2.x. the documentation for
it says it's compatible with either 2.x or 3.x, but the port requires
3.x as a dependency. the attached patch adds a NAGIOS_PORT variable,
similar to the APACHE_PORT variable i've used in the past. this
allows the user
This is not quite correct statement. ATM all required packages are
present in the ports tree.
./run script fetched from the trunk may need a quick lobotomy course
though.
When I checked it out last time whole thing just works (well it still
works :-)
On 13.03.2009, at 12:31, 葉佳威 Jiawei Ye
Hi
I have posted separately about the failure of rubygem-actionwebserve but
thought it might be useful to note that its failure also prevents upgrade of
rubygem-rails
Skipping 'www/rubygem-rails' (rubygem-rails-1.2.6) because a requisite
package 'rubygem-actionwebservice-1.2.6' (www/rubygem-ac
Hi
Getting the abov error despite having up to date ports tree!
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> From: bf bf20...@yahoo.com
[snip]
> The problem is that the port's parser is
> broken, owing in part to incompatibilities between the
> system yacc currently used to build the parser and GNU
> bison, which is used by the people who write bash. This
> is true of both shells/bash and shells/b
> From: bf
> > > {Problem with Bash-4 and $(command) ...}:
> > [...]
> > > I found the same problem, and have reverted to
> > > bash3.2 until it's sorted out.
> >
> > See if the following helps.
> >
> > http://tiswww.case.edu/php/chet/bash/COMPAT
> >
> > Especially:
> >
> > 38. Since bash-4.0
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> And now ports/132264[1] has been submitted.
>
> References:
> 1) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=132264
Maintainer feedback received - positive. Is anything more needed?
If not, could somebody commit this?
--
Regards,
Tor
17 matches
Mail list logo