Trying to compile from ports and unfortunately I continuously receive
this stop in the compile process. I have removed and deleted everything
that I could from distfiles and temp directories and have been unable to
compile. My temporary solution is to run the latest version below this
in ports
2008/2/27, Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There's nothing easy about it, but it's not a CATASTROPHE to put too much
> in PERL_DEPENDS. And it's quite simple: Jifty is buggy, since it doesn't
> put Test-modules in build_requires rather than requires, so do what you can
> to send p
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:59:32PM -0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
> Let me pick a vivid example, www/p5-Jifty, which is maintained by [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> Sorry, tobez@, I'm not against you, just want to make sure that you want us
> (p5-* port maintainers) to do so. I really have no problem if you wa
"Yen-Ming Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thank you for showing that you neither understand the issue nor have
> > any interest in fixing it.
> I don't know why you attacked me several times like that.
Perhaps because you responded to my attem
Now 7.0-RELEASE has been announce, the ports tree is again open for all
commits. Thank you for your patience.
-erwin on behalf of portmgr
--
Erwin Lansing http://droso.org
(o_ _o)
Errare humanum est \\\_\ /_
On Monday 18 February 2008 05:10:24 am Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> +stable@
>
> Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
> > Why are so many people are bitten by this? Is that the jobs of
port-upgrading
> > tool to safe copy these libraries to compat so that all programs using
> > the old libraries works?
>
> Portu
Sorry to quote a lot from my previous mail.
I had one wrong statement so I have to repeat the example to correct it.
2008/2/27, Yen-Ming Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For example, module A said it needs module B, C, D, E in Makefile,
> among them, B, C are needed for run and D, E are needed for tes
Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
> I don't think that it is a good idea to have 3-rd party code as FreeBSD
> ports patches (ports patches are FreeBSD specific code). I think it
> would be better to have some directive for enabling extra modules for
> nginx and make subports for such modules, in the similar
2008/2/27, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > And I guess that you prefer to keep RUN_DEPENDS simple, and even
> > ignore BUILD_DEPENDS at all. The users will get some warning messages
> > for missing dependencies but it builds anyway. However, It means that
> > the port maintainers ne
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:27 AM, GP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have noted that there aren't many (if any) copyrights in FreeBSD manpages.
> I appreciate that. But GDlib has the following text in its license
>
>"Permission has been granted to copy, distribute and modify gd in
>any conte
I have noted that there aren't many (if any) copyrights in FreeBSD manpages.
I appreciate that. But GDlib has the following text in its license
"Permission has been granted to copy, distribute and modify gd in
any context without fee, including a commercial application,
provided that this n
Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are arguing about a relatively minor thing here, namely about whether to
> keep the knowledge about dual-life modules in bsd.perl.mk or try to deduce
> it in runtime (and by proxy, whether to use the existing *package* version
> check or to do perl *mo
Ryan Tomayko wrote:
Hello Sergey,
There is an experimental module for nginx that adds fair upstream/proxy
balancing (note that this is a "third party" patch, not an optional
nginx module):
http://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxHttpUpstreamFairModule
We've modified the nginx port to include the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:51:20AM +0300, Alex Pivovarov wrote:
> Hi
> Could you commit update for squirrel-sql-2.5 to 2.6.4?
>
> Besides of version change I also think it is a good idea to provide squirrel
> with popular Db plugins.
> To do it we ne
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:16:15 +0300
"Alex Pivovarov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Seems that pkg-plist file should also be updated. I did it. The file
> as attached.
[ ... ]
Please submit this all as a PR so that it doesn't get lost.
This port is unmaintained and since you are intereste
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:22:06AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The rest of the ports tree checks every dependency right before building
> > > it; I don't see why Perl ports should be any diff
> And I guess that you prefer to keep RUN_DEPENDS simple, and even
> ignore BUILD_DEPENDS at all. The users will get some warning messages
> for missing dependencies but it builds anyway. However, It means that
> the port maintainers need to somehow find out that which dependencies
> are really nee
Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The rest of the ports tree checks every dependency right before building
> > it; I don't see why Perl ports should be any different.
> Er, I am not sure we understood each other here. What I was trying
Hi
Seems that pkg-plist file should also be updated. I did it. The file as
attached.
Regards
Alex
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alex Pivovarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:51 AM
Subject: Could you commit update for squirrel-sql-2.5 to 2.6.4 (plus adding
popu
19 matches
Mail list logo
