Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: > I don't think that it is a good idea to have 3-rd party code as FreeBSD > ports patches (ports patches are FreeBSD specific code). I think it > would be better to have some directive for enabling extra modules for > nginx and make subports for such modules, in the similar way as php > ports for example.
That makes sense. Sergey responded off list with the exact same advice. I'll take it. > Here is a small patch. Maybe this should be better done using OPTIONS. It looks like both php and mail/postfix would be good examples of how something like this might be best accomplished. Thanks for the example; I think I basically understand what's going on here. Thanks -- Ryan Tomayko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://tomayko.com http://lesscode.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
