Re: Port dependencies on p5-Test-*

2008/2/24, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > There is a ridiculous amount of p5-* ports that have completely > unnecessary build dependencies on p5-Test-*. These package are usually > only needed to run unit tests (cd ${WRKSRC} && make test), which *none* > of those ports do. > > (ridic

FreeBSD Port: apache+mod_perl-1.3.39

Hello, Can't compile this port. Errormessage: FBSD7# make install ===> Building for apache+mod_perl-1.3.39 ===> src ===> src/regex <=== src/regex ===> src/os/unix <=== src/os/unix ===> src/ap <=== src/ap ===> src/main cc -c -I.. -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE -I../os/unix -I../include

Re: Port dependencies on p5-Test-*

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:32:46AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > There is a ridiculous amount of p5-* ports that have completely > unnecessary build dependencies on p5-Test-*. These package are usually > only needed to run unit tests (cd ${WRKSRC} && make test), which *none* > of those ports

Port dependencies on p5-Test-*

There is a ridiculous amount of p5-* ports that have completely unnecessary build dependencies on p5-Test-*. These package are usually only needed to run unit tests (cd ${WRKSRC} && make test), which *none* of those ports do. (ridiculous, in this case, means close to 300) What's worse, most of t

/usr/ports/graphics/OpenEXR build error

Trying to upgrade /usr/ports/graphics/OpenEXR by following instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING (20071008): [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/graphics/OpenEXR]# make install ===> Building for OpenEXR-1.6.0 Making all in config gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/graphics/OpenEXR/work/openexr-1.6

You just recieved an electronic card! Thanks!

Hi, You just recieved an electronic card! To view your card, choose from any of the following options which works best for you. Method 1 Just click on the following Internet address (if that doesn't work for you, copy & paste the address onto your brows

Re: FreeBSD Port: grub-0.97_1

Robert Millan wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 07:01:55PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Robert Millan wrote: Hey, Do you plan on adding GRUB 2 to the ports collection? GRUB Legacy is not actively developed anymore, as you may have noticed. I don't think I'll port GRUB2. Last time I've tried i

Re: FreeBSD Port: grub-0.97_1

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 07:01:55PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > >Hey, > > > >Do you plan on adding GRUB 2 to the ports collection? GRUB Legacy is not > >actively developed anymore, as you may have noticed. > > I don't think I'll port GRUB2. Last time I've tried it, I'v

Re: FreeBSD Port: grub-0.97_1

Robert Millan wrote: Hey, Do you plan on adding GRUB 2 to the ports collection? GRUB Legacy is not actively developed anymore, as you may have noticed. I don't think I'll port GRUB2. Last time I've tried it, I've spent a lot of time just to build it. Btw, GRUB 2 added support for UFS and

Re: Portmaster and added dependencies

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:19:41 -1000 Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, new stable version of Perl is 5.10. Not presently available in the ports tree; nor is it likely to be until FBSD 7.0 stable is released from what I have read. Personally, I find it rather archaic to hold a new version hosta

Apache Commons ports: unfetchable distfiles

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Marcin Cieslak >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Apache Commons ports: unfetchable distfiles >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Category: ports >Class: update >Release: FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 >Envi