Re: Suggested improvements for ports

Doug Barton wrote at 13:45 -0800 on Jan 12, 2008: > I have actually advocated in the past that ALL ports should have version > numbers, and that we then create virtual ports (symlinks, whatever) that > point to whatever is the "current" version of that software. Different > developers dislik

Micropolis port

I discover this afternoon Micropolis, the renamed "Sim City" game who is now open source (see http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/12/1846256&from=rss) I really was a addicted to this game so I decide to try a port to FreeBSD At this point and after a few fixes the code compile wit

Re: Oracle SQL Developer

Marcin Cieslak wrote: martinko wrote: Hallo, Would someone care to port Oracle's SQL Developer to FreeBSD, please ? Many thanks in advance! There is actually nothing to port, just download the non-JRE platform in

Re: Another question based on: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!

Le Dim 13 jan 08 à 19:21:50 +0100, eculp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : > I probably have something wrong and there are many variables. If I may ask, > which linux emulator and kernel are you using and are you using AMD or > i386 distributions? I'm assuming there could very well be difference

Re: enigmail

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:47:06 -0600, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You mean by this? http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/gecko-ports.diff Yes remember when I tested I said I had recompiled enigmail for other reasons (I thou

Re: enigmail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > >> You mean by this? > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/gecko-ports.diff Yes remember when I tested I said I had recompiled enigmail for other reasons (I thought so at least but then this report) and got a simelar message on firefox (re-inst

Re: enigmail

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:24:12 -0600, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:07:38 -0600, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: martinko wrote: Alex Dupre wrote: Chuck Robey wrote: The

Re: enigmail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:07:38 -0600, Aryeh M. Friedman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > martinko wrote: Alex Dupre wrote: > Chuck Robey wrote: >> There's a mail/engimail, but there's also a >> mail/enigmail-sea

Re: Another question based on: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!

Quoting Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Le Dim 13 jan 08 à 15:25:15 +0100, eculp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : Is there an "accepted" or reasonably so, sure-fire way to get linux flash[79] working in Prerelease or in current? If so, would you please share how you did it on this list?

Re: enigmail

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:07:38 -0600, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 martinko wrote: Alex Dupre wrote: Chuck Robey wrote: There's a mail/engimail, but there's also a mail/enigmail-seamonkey, and it's that latter one that has no desc

Re: CFT: Adobe Reader 8 + SCIM/UIM

Nikola Lečić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ni> 3. Now acroread7 doesn't work (for me at least), with all SCIM-related ni>environment variables schemes. It just returns me back to the shell ni>prompt without any error message; ni> ni> 4. However, if I use the environm

Re: Suggested improvements for ports

Doug Barton wrote: Dominic Fandrey wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: 1) You can't build a dependent port and first set the config for the options that you want. So, when you select sasl in postfix, you never get the chance to check the saslauthd option, for example. As the ports man page states: #

Re: enigmail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 martinko wrote: > Alex Dupre wrote: >> Chuck Robey wrote: >>> There's a mail/engimail, but there's also a >>> mail/enigmail-seamonkey, and it's that latter one that has no >>> description, not even a plist to help out. If I already have a >>> Seamonke

Re: Another question based on: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!

Le Dim 13 jan 08 à 15:25:15 +0100, eculp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : > Is there an "accepted" or reasonably so, sure-fire way to get linux > flash[79] working in Prerelease or in current? If so, would you > please share how you did it on this list? Well, I have a working flashplugin 7, o

Re: enigmail

Alex Dupre wrote: Chuck Robey wrote: There's a mail/engimail, but there's also a mail/enigmail-seamonkey, and it's that latter one that has no description, not even a plist to help out. If I already have a Seamonkey that I like, which should I install? enigmail-seamonkey -- Alex Dupre I wo

Another question based on: Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!

The dialog at the end of this email is becoming a bit more philosophical than I need right now ;). Is there an "accepted" or reasonably so, sure-fire way to get linux flash[79] working in Prerelease or in current? If so, would you please share how you did it on this list? Flash is becomi

Re: ports/118213: games/HeroesOfMightAndMagic - heroesOfMightAndMagic's doesn't work correctly

After some more investigation it turns out to be some side effect of the sound changes made on 2006-11-26. The game works fine using a kernel before that change, later ones (but before the linuxulator mmap changes between 2007-02-15 and 2007-02-16) cause a hard reboot. The responsible parties, emu